[RD] Charlie Kirk assassinated

I’ve been very disappointed to see how many conservatives have gone full snowflake trying to cancel folks for insensitive comments, but I am somewhat heartened by how many conservatives are taking Pam Bondi to task for her stuck on stupid “hate speech” comment.

This has been a most ironic week.
 
My love, I write to inform you that my return to you might well prove to be delayed by some indeterminable passage of time. It shan’t be long until the two of us can reunite, but before we do, I must retrieve my firearm. There is a matter I had intended to safeguard as the profoundest secret until I should reach the end of my years, but it regrettably proves that I must involve you in this affair.

You are not indicating to me that you are the one who shot Charlie Kirk, are you?

Let me state in no ambiguous terms that I indeed am. I apologize profusely for any vexatious consequences this might occasion for you, my sweeting.

I thought the police had apprehended a suspect.

Yes, dear one, to a superficial outward view that might seem to have been the case; however, the person they apprehended in fact has no connection with the shooting whatsoever. Moreover, a second person fell under their suspicion simply because he was appareled in clothing similar to my own. I had planned to retrieve the weapon with which—again let me state clearly—I carried out the murder of Charlie Kirk from my drop point shortly thereupon, but most of that side of town was under surveillance. It is quiet—almost, one might say, quiet enough for a person to make an escape, but there is one vehicle lingering.

Why?

Why did I commit the murder of Charlie Kirk? Is that what you are asking?

Yes.

I had come to have my fill—yea, to the point of oversaturation—of the man’s animosity. There are some occasions on which negotiation is of no avail. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. I am setting forth to retrieve it again, in the hope that law enforcement might have vacated the area. The news has not informed me that the murder weapon has been located.

How long have you been deliberately premeditating this heinous crime?

To the best of my recollection, inamorata, for approximately one half of a fortnight. I believe I can get close to the weapon, although a vehicle belonging to law enforcement idles nearby.

I now find myself in the position of regretting that I had not, previously, through a circuitous perambulation, retrieved the weapon that I employed in the murder of Charlie Kirk.

That firearm, belonging as it did to my forebearers, will be of particular interest to my father (or “old man,” as a person of that familial relation has not in common parlance been denominated for well-nigh fifty years).

Let me also take this as the occasion, though completely unprompted, to indicate to you that the public might soon come to be bewildered by a set of engravings on the munitions I employed. My motivation in so inscribing the items in question was simply so that I could find amusement in those commenting on the matter being compelled to employ an idiom unfamiliar to them.

Since you and I have had no previous occasion to discuss this matter, I want to say to you that, dating from the election of our current president, my father has been wildly enamored of the man. I just suddenly desired to communicate that to you, a propos of nothing at all.

It is good that we have thus spoken to one another in an manner that is perfectly natural for individuals of our era who have reached that stage of maturation to which the two of us have arrived. All of my concerns center on you, dearest.

On the contrary, I am stricken with the profoundest apprehension on your behalf.

If you are questioned by law enforcement, secure an attorney.
 
Who the hell writes texts like that, even on Discord? Gen Z?
 
Yeah i think this probably is going to result in a payout. As a side note it is fascinating to see conservative officials running through 2015-2017 leftoid social media discourse about the tradeoffs of free speech vs the harms caused by certain kinds of speech. Nancy Mace tweeted "free speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences", which is an exact phrase you heard a lot in that era, Pam Bondi is talking about how hate speech isn't free speech, and I think "consequences culture" may also be a literally recycled phrase from that time too.
In fact it has been used in these very forums by a lot of people actually.
Funny in a totally predictable way.
 
I'm not particularly interested in entertaining this discussion of abstractions.
Well of course not, that would require honestly approaching what was actually said rather than making trite misrepresentations. The latter isn't really something you can pull off in an extended format.

If you (general you) say that affirmative action is the same thing as (or very similar to) white supremacy you are defending white supremacy.
You were the one who made the comparison, not me (general me). I merely agreed that the latter was bad as well. And then in your next response you say I'm defending it. It's impossible to have any meaningul exchange if these are the rules you're playing by.
 
Character assassination.
Been there.
Got angry by the wild assumption folks were doing about me.
Now I shrug it off and think to myself "Thank you for that ordeal! It makes me happier to care even less about your opinions on me, you radioactive monkey on the web:p"
 
Saying that one particular member of a group (or 4) is stupid, doesn't imply that you see that as a defining characteristic of the group.
It's a sort of a fortiori formulation. If Ketanji Brown Jackson lacks the brainpower to serve on the Supreme Court, how much more would any other black woman lack that brainpower. So let me ask you this, is there some other black woman whom he would have thought possesses the brainpower to serve on the Court? Or did. Some black woman about whose aptitude for jurisprudence he spoke highly?
 
Who the hell writes texts like that, even on Discord? Gen Z?
Many are saying stuff like 'my love' is boomer talk, others saying AI. Thing is, if its AI, that doesnt tell us anything either. College kids using Ai to write their their college thesis, the shooter is just as likely to use it as someone trying to create fake evidence.
 
In fact it has been used in these very forums by a lot of people actually.
Funny in a totally predictable way.

Oh there’s been plenty of times over the years where I’ve been called a number of names for being against it way back when. It’s never “fun” defending freedom of speech. You’re nearly always defending something stupid when you do it.

I can’t remember which posters I went up against and it doesn’t really matter because folks are allowed to change their minds. I’d just hope that if someone used to use these arguments before, they might revisit them now that they’ve seen first hand the other perspective.

That would be a good thing to come out of this whole ordeal.

And as an olive branch from my end, I’ll admit I’m looking at members of this admin like Bondi, seeing what they’re saying, grimacing a bit and saying, “Well… I guess I can see why some of those lefties think these folks are fascists” lol.

It’s OK TO GROW, guys!
 
The cope here is pathetic.
"It must be a right-winger! Let's hope it's a right winger!"
"Yesssssssssss. It's a right winger! We're the good guys after all. Yay! Boo right wingers!"
*it's actually not a right winger, but someone who was pumped full of hate to the point he shot someone in the neck in front of thousands of people*
"This must be fake! Impossible, we're the tolerant and peaceful ones! This is impossible! I don't want to be held up a mirror and look at this!"
 
The cope here is pathetic.
"It must be a right-winger! Let's hope it's a right winger!"
"Yesssssssssss. It's a right winger! We're the good guys after all. Yay! Boo right wingers!"
*it's actually not a right winger, but someone who was pumped full of hate to the point he shot someone in the neck in front of thousands of people*
"This must be fake! Impossible, we're the tolerant and peaceful ones! This is impossible! I don't want to be held up a mirror and look at this!"
You're very angry at what you imagine your opposition to be
 
The cope here is pathetic.
"It must be a right-winger! Let's hope it's a right winger!"
"Yesssssssssss. It's a right winger! We're the good guys after all. Yay! Boo right wingers!"
*it's actually not a right winger, but someone who was pumped full of hate to the point he shot someone in the neck in front of thousands of people*
"This must be fake! Impossible, we're the tolerant and peaceful ones! This is impossible! I don't want to be held up a mirror and look at this!"
I mean tbh I think the story makes absolutely zero sense either and I’m “a right winger.”
 
still not an opinion to get assassinated for
He should have been thoroughly mocked and dismissed for his views, not shot. That just makes everything worse.
 
I mean tbh I think the story makes absolutely zero sense either and I’m “a right winger.”
[edit for past tense]
I was not responding to how much sense it makes - time will tell how much of it is real or not.

I was responding to the reactions from the people here.

Could it be fake? Could be. Could be not. I know as much as the ones calling it fake.
Does it make sense that they fabricate this?
Not really. If it's discovered to be fabricated, not only does the killer walk free with a mis-trial but the people who ordered are in deep trouble.
 
He should have been thoroughly mocked and dismissed for his views, not shot. That just makes everything worse.
Your healthy view on things is a breath of fresh air between the rest I'm reading here.
 
He was on the recieving end of the hate he preached and now, thankfully, that has stopped, let us hope his hateful rhetoric recedes from society
 
He was on the recieving end of the hate he preached and now, thankfully, that has stopped, let us hope his hateful rhetoric recedes from society
It only gets worse, Miller now has his Reichstag Fire moment. Allowing them to brand anyone left of the current admin as Terrorists™. As per Project 2025
 
[edit for past tense]
I was not responding to how much sense it makes - time will tell how much of it is real or not.

I was responding to the reactions from the people here.

Could it be fake? Could be. Could be not. I know as much as the ones calling it fake.
Does it make sense that they fabricate this?
Not really. If it's discovered to be fabricated, not only does the killer walk free with a mis-trial but the people who ordered are in deep trouble.
Oh I get it. Believe me I get it lol.

I just think if it’s a legitimate concern it’s hard for me to call it cope.

I think it makes a lot of sense to fabricate this and that the idea would be we are all so tribal you can pretty much be assured it wouldn’t change much even if you were discovered.
 
Back
Top Bottom