I like Valve as a developer company. I don't need to use Steam, but its an okay system and it works well for many people.
That being said, I do not think that it is beneficial for any one provider to hold a monopoly over computer gaming. I would like to share with you the following post below.
The concept of "being forced to use Steam" in this context is irrational in itself.
Steam is being used as the fundamental basis for all the online content, data distribution, multiplayer and purchase verification.
People are acting like it's just this DD service that Firaxis has bound themselves to for no good reason, but it's nothing like that. It's not about DRM, it's not about DD, these are just a couple in a long list of features that the game is using from the steamworks platform.
Complaining about being "forced" to use Steam in this context is like complaining about being "forced" to use directx.
You can disable every single feature of Steam except for the one time validation when you first install. Every single feature so you don't even notice it's there.
I'm not picking on only the irrational arguments against the steam integration, I'm calling the whole thing irrational because it is.
This has got to be the first Straw Man argument someone has actually said. To spell it out for you when you said
"Steam is being used as the fundamental basis for all the online content, data distribution, multiplayer and purchase verification." I nearly ROFLMAO'd ...
Precicely because it is Steam's pursuit of making Computer Gaming a unified and closed system which brings about all of the irrationality out of the woodwork. Making Computer Gaming a closed system (everything through Steam-or any other single provider) simply invalidates, for most people, all of the extra headaches that come with PC gaming.
The very fact that Steam is openly pursuing a Closed System, and that you subconsciously realize this, say it, and is perfectly okay with it, tells me that you see the PC as just another console. If the PC was just another console then I would gladly use the OTHER consoles primarily, that do their job a whole lot better on average.
It is the freedom and diversity of Computer gaming that makes system far more than just a simplified console. As others have stated, many free and independent programs can do the non-game aspects of Steam just as well or better than Steam does.
While I respect Valve from a game development standpoint, their publishing and business practices as a whole leave a bad taste in my mouth. Computer gaming is not meant to be simplified and lorded over under one authoritarian government (Steam). Computer gaming is meant to have a variety of various independent companies vying for the interest of the Consumer with better functionality.
Its simple free market vs closed market. For making the PC into a closed system makes it a closed market ... which means that instead of liking companies X, Y, and Z, you either like the PC or you don't like it .... just like you like the X-box or don't like it, because the publishing, marketing, and virtual community is all the same, and thus geared towards largely the same kind of player. The console player*.
I like consoles a lot, but computers are meant to be different. Draconian systems for Console games ported to the computer are reasonable, while doing the same on PC only games is a serious breach of the spirit of Computer gaming as a whole.
Moderator Action: Please don't SPAM the forum with the same post in multiple threads