Its worth remembering that theres probably 30% more content in L4D2 as compared with 1 and they're doing some clever free support for it. Its obviously a fully fledged sequel and not just a collection of patches/expansion content.
Basically, having been spoilt (and continuing to be so) by TF2, valve's fans had a tantrum at their company not giving them huge quantities of free stuff in all their games. Hell, some kind of update went through on the Half Life series yesterday and I know theres a sizeable Counterstrike upgrade in beta testing right now.
Not that I'm complaining that a bunch of my PC games are getting a free upgrade to a better game engine, but they do have a profit motive there.
The game itself now serves as the hub of community activity, featuring the ability to share scenarios, compare scores, brag about achievements and visit one of the thriving Civ fansites without leaving the game.
We encourage protecting your PC from viruses, spyware and other forms of malicious software. However, it is not necessary to run anti-virus and other security applications while you are engaged in playing a game on Steam.
I disagree with the statement that AV programs are unecessary when playing Steam games. Afterall, our firewalls are subject to be randomly pinged for vulnerabilities everytime we are connected to the net. But we are especially vulnerable as we navigate websites. Banner ads can contain attack code. And viewing screenshots of user mods etc can infect us. Why does Steam suggest playing Russian Roulette with our system security by turning off our AV programs? Or am I missing something?
Read what I wrote. I speak not of randomly surfing the web, but of using the community features pitched by Steam. Specifically "visit one of the thriving Civ fansites without leaving the game". Steam clearly states that "it is not necessary to run anti-virus and other security applications while you are engaged in playing a game on Steam." They said that. This is bad advice whenever you are running Steam in online mode. It becomes especially dangerous advice when you use Steams community hub features to visit fan sites. I for one see the danger immediately, and if I ever were to use Steam and it conflicts with my AV, I would NOT disable it. I would toss the game along with Steam first. But I've no doubt that some users will disable their AV as suggested by Steam and become infected as a result.The obvious assumption here is that the only thing you are doing is running Steam.
They didn't mean to turn off your virus scanner while playing steam and simultaneously surfing porn on an unpatched version of IE6.
They are saying that malicious code cannot be transmitted to your system via the Steam platform. This may well be true, but I'd always be wary about relying on such assurances.
Regardless, as soon as you are running any other application that can contain vulnerabilities their advice becomes invalid. They are saying that if you have a secure system and then run Steam on it, it becomes no less secure.
Read what I wrote. I speak not of randomly surfing the web, but of using the community features pitched by Steam. Specifically "visit one of the thriving Civ fansites without leaving the game".
Read what I wrote. I speak not of randomly surfing the web, but of using the community features pitched by Steam. Specifically "visit one of the thriving Civ fansites without leaving the game". Steam clearly states that "it is not necessary to run anti-virus and other security applications while you are engaged in playing a game on Steam." They said that. This is bad advice whenever you are running Steam in online mode. It becomes especially dangerous advice when you use Steams community hub features to visit fan sites. I for one see the danger immediately, and if I ever were to use Steam and it conflicts with my AV, I would NOT disable it. I would toss the game along with Steam first. But I've no doubt that some users will disable their AV as suggested by Steam and become infected as a result.
Steams credibility suffers another hit. This matters to me because I seek to do my due diligence before investing time and money into a piece of potentially buggy software. Buyer beware and all that. Thus far, and for a variety of different reasons, Steam does not strike me as a good bet.
From the Civ5 pitch at the Steam Store...
How does that reconcile with Steams recommendation to disable anti-virus applications when running Steam connected games?
I disagree with the statement that AV programs are unecessary when playing Steam games. Afterall, our firewalls are subject to be randomly pinged for vulnerabilities everytime we are connected to the net. But we are especially vulnerable as we navigate websites. Banner ads can contain attack code. And viewing screenshots of user mods etc can infect us. Why does Steam suggest playing Russian Roulette with our system security by turning off our AV programs? Or am I missing something?
EDIT: Point of fact. Users at this site have reported virus infections caused by banner ads. It's just the nature of the beast. The CFC staff here, and the forums host, have responded in an appropriate and timely manner. They do what they can. Kudos to them for that. But it does happen. Turning off your AV in order to run a piece of software, and then using that software to navigate the web cannot be a wise idea!?!
Correction: Visiting thriving Civ fansites without leaving the game.Playing a game on steam. Not browsing websites.
These Steam discussions are important to me as I make the decision to buy or pass on the latest release from a beloved game franchise. With the sporadic exception of an open sourced TBS game engine based on the Axis and Allies board game, Civ is basically the ONLY game I play. Its the only gaming entertaiment I seek. But now it may have a bit of something that I want no part of. This decision is important to me. So I discuss and I research and I spend time becoming informed.Is it fun trawling the internet for every single gripe any member of humanity has ever thought up against the platform and posting it? You're just looking for things to complain about.
You can find things that people have said about any product that are technically incorrect if you pick them apart.
You're just ranting without direction or purpose. So someone at Valve gave some advice ages ago that is technically no longer 100% true due to newly released functionality in a game that's not even released yet. Who cares. Seriously. How is this even slightly important.
Correction: Visiting thriving Civ fansites without leaving the game.
I respect the relation of your experiance. But in the whole it means little. With Civ4 some people reported problems running the game, while others said they were full of it because they personally never encountered any problems. Meanwhile Firaxis continued an attempt to fix the MAF and other errors. And people updated their drivers and lowered graphics settings and managed other applications to not run while Civ4 was running etc. The problems did exist. People were dealing with them. Yet there was no shortage of people trolling around the troubleshooting threads saying that Civ4 ran fine for them so just stfu already.I use Kaspersky now and used av from other vendors in the past and never had a problem with Steam or games on Steam.
I think that page it's more of troubleshooting information than a "you must do this" requirement. If you check FAQs of most online games you will see that disabling AV is one of the first steps suggested.
Indeed it is troubleshooting advice. But in it they make a standalone statement that security applications do not need to be run while playing games using Steam. People encountering problems using Steam, and there are many, will be subject to this advice. It is bad advice. Better to unistall Steam and lose the money invested on the games than to disable your AV while connected to the net.Its also worth noting that White Elks link was to a page for people having AV problems with Steam. Turning off your AV wihle playing games was not a general recommendation made, but a specific one. The Anti-Steam crew are really trying hard to take rare situations and quotations that are out of context and scare people with them.
Playing a game on steam. Not browsing websites.
Correction: Visiting thriving Civ fansites without leaving the game.
Save for my addition of "-ing" and subtraction of "one of the", that is EXACTLY what it says!No, that's not what it says, it says "playing the game". You can't just change the words of the quote then say "see, now it's wrong!".
...and visit one of the thriving Civ fansites without leaving the game.
The game itself now serves as the hub of community activity, featuring the ability to share scenarios, compare scores, brag about achievements and visit one of the thriving Civ fansites without leaving the game.
In-Game Community Hub: Compete with Civ players from all over the globe via the Internet or compete locally in LAN matches, offering endless ways to rule the world. The game itself now serves as the hub of community activity, featuring the ability to share scenarios, compare scores, brag about achievements and visit one of the thriving Civ fansites without leaving the game. It's now easier than ever for players to become involved in the global Civ Community.
What part of buyer beware do you not understand? For some of us our purpose here is to decide if we are willing to install an extra piece of software on our systems. Installing Civ5 was a no-brainer for me. I've had my experiance with Civ bugs, belated patches, and overblown marketing hype; but upon hearing news that it was to be released this fall, I made the decision to pre-order it through CivFanatics before I read anything about the new features. I'll take the high potential that Civ5 will be buggy upon release because the software provides something I desire.This forum has 'complaining hypothetical problems before the fact' perfected to an artform. For all you know Civ V with no-steam would make your computer explode. Where is it written that it won't?
https://support.steampowered.com/kb_article.php?ref=5406-WFZC-5519Valve said:WHY WOULD A STEAM ACCOUNT BE DISABLED?
Check the contact e-mail address for your Steam account to see if Steam Support has contacted you regarding the reason your account was disabled - accounts may be temporarily disabled pending verification of purchase information or account ownership.
Steam Support does not automatically contact the owners of disabled accounts in most circumstances.
There is a Zero-Tolerance policy for any violations of the Steam Subscriber Agreement and Online Code of Conduct. All accounts in a user's possession for any of the following activities will be disabled:
<snip>