civplayah's experimental mafia

Call me paranoid, but that sounded extremely scummy.

unvote, vote: Dommy.
 
Talking in PM is a great way to test someone's suspicion. He can think you are lying.

And people don't just say "oh, believe me, talk to Zack and he'll clear everything up." You yourself seem to have faith in Zack. Based on your play in NotW, where you immediately and openly talked about your masonhood, do you consider yourself a mason with Zack?

Or do you simply assume that people are trustworthy just because they talk? Wildly running around and then trusting people simply because they talk is no way to play.

unvote Takhisis, renowned kitteh enslaver; vote Domination3000
 
Talking in PM is a great way to test someone's suspicion. He can think you are lying.

And people don't just say "oh, believe me, talk to Zack and he'll clear everything up." You yourself seem to have faith in Zack. Based on your play in NotW, do you consider yourself a mason with Zack?

Or do you simply assume that people are trustworthy just because they talk? Wildly running around and then trusting people simply because they talk is no way to play.

unvote Takhisis, renowned kitteh enslaver; vote Domination3000

Sonereal spoke with me in PM. Based on what I said, I trust him.

However, you voted for me just because Double A Did, which makes it obvious I cannot trust you.

Vote Kennegit.
 
LightFang, wideyedwanderer

Voting for Takhisis? Talk about low-hanging fruit!

(Although I am tempted to vote for Dom3K and Kennigit for using unvote: and vote:. Only Double A is allowed to do that. :nono:)
 
I'd be wary of Takhisis Cartharsis. I think his cats are hungry for your bird. HE'S A BLOODTHIRSTY KILLER.

well, he could be.

So now Domination, I've PMed you and have now "talked" to you. I expect to see "oh wait, Kennigit talked to me. Based on what he said I trust him."

Or that's what you apparently do for everyone else......unless you are a mason. In which case you do have less cause for suspicion.
 
Well, I think in a one-on-one fight, my bird could probably take his cat. It's a genuine bird of prey, talons and everything, not just some lame songbird.

Not sure it could beat your boxes, though. I mean, there's two of them. It wouldn't be fair.
 
Simple. But the bird IN THE BOX and I close it on you guys. Two birds (or rather, one bird and one cat) with one box, that coincidentally also had one stone in it. But Double A's fire might burn my wooden boxes.

Anyways, I'm done spamming this thread. Sorry all!
 
I'd be wary of Takhisis Cartharsis. I think his cats are hungry for your bird. HE'S A BLOODTHIRSTY KILLER.

well, he could be.

So now Domination, I've PMed you and have now "talked" to you. I expect to see "oh wait, Kennigit talked to me. Based on what he said I trust him."

Or that's what you apparently do for everyone else......unless you are a mason. In which case you do have less cause for suspicion.

No, Its because Zack told the truth in NOTW, and he's experienced, therefore I trust him to give me accurate results. Now, he could be the Mafia, and I've gotta be on my toes just like against everyone else.

As for Sonereal, I was suspicious of him because he voted for Zack right after Zack voted for me, which seemed odd considering I am hated here. However, Sonereal explained it was random. I'm still suspicious of him just as much as everyone else, however, I am not specifically suspicious of him anymore.
 
LightFang, wideyedwanderer

Voting for Takhisis? Talk about low-hanging fruit!

(Although I am tempted to vote for Dom3K and Kennigit for using unvote: and vote:. Only Double A is allowed to do that. :nono:)

:D

stupid 5chars
 
As for Sonereal, I was suspicious of him because he voted for Zack right after Zack voted for me, which seemed odd considering I am hated here. However, Sonereal explained it was random. I'm still suspicious of him just as much as everyone else, however, I am not specifically suspicious of him anymore.

I don't see what you're seeing there. I didn't vote for him right after he voted for you (why would I vote for him because he voted for you anyway). I voted for him 50 minutes later and if someone had already voted for him, I would've voted for someone who hadn't already been voted against as my vote was just a random vote, not one meant to take out someone I'm suspicious of (and I'm not particularly suspicious of anyone right now).

Wait, so if I had voted for you instead of him, that wouldn't have been suspicious to you? I just didn't want to jump on a bandwagon (which didn't exist at the time I voted).

The problem is that you suddenly come out in the thread, said I looked suspicious for no other reasons than that I spelled Zack's name wrong and voted for him....50 minutes after he voted for you.
 
Okay, listen, this is not going to work out if everyone is trying to figure out the experiment. I really want to get to the end of this game but I can't if everyone figures it out. I've had a few people discussing it and I thought I deliberately said otherwise. You may discuss your role but no discussion of game mechanics.
 
Huh. No rules, no info. And that big voice says we can't even try to figure out the rules or anything. Interesting. Interesting. How about laying off that Domination kid, guys? He doesn't know what he's talking about, no sense in killin' someone for bein' clueless. Now the quiet ones; they the ones you gotta keep an eye on. What's your opinion on this, Choxorn?
 
You do know that the game's already started, right?
 
I vote bestrfcplayer, for not reading the thread and noticing sign-ups have been closed for a while.
 
Does that mean that he's officially in play then? What does the playah of civ have to say about it?
 
I dunno. Bein' clueless is somethin' I can usually sympathize with, but in this case he might hurt the experiment.

So no, not choxorn, but rather, D3k!
 
Back
Top Bottom