To come in on TMIT's point, I think there's a danger in assuming that countries are masters of their own fate. We can all agree, I think, that economic success is some part policy and some part good luck - this is true whether you're talking about an individual, a company or a country. The danger in simply mirroring the tactics of those who succeeded in the past is that it's difficult to tell apart the actions were in fact positively helpful in making a person or a country richer and the actions which were either inconsequential or which had a hindering effect, albeit one which we couldn't see because luck or some other factor meant that they succeeded regardless. It all depends on how predictable you think the world economy is, and I think we should be erring on the side of 'not very'. If we do so, then we have to also conclude that even the best policy is likely to yield not particularly good results, and that copying those who have previously been successful is likely not to be the best policy.
There's an old cautionary tale about a millionaire who was seen standing pointing at the sky, and several people who decided to copy him, and all walked around pointing at the sky in the hope that it would make them rich. Eventually, 'Rich Men Point at the Sky' became a runaway success of a self-improvement book, and the original rich man was invited to be interviewed on television - at which point he admitted, somewhat bemusedly, that he had only been trying to point out a beautiful sunset.