'commies'

Originally posted by XIII
The ones in Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia.
Redundancy again. If you can't vote for much of anyhting, NOT being able to vote for a communist isn't a tragedy in and of itself, but part of the greater tragedy of political oppression.

Originally posted by ecadre
A crude analysis, there is a wide ranging debate in Communist Parties about the different socialist countries, we would certainly not describe them as "cruel dictatorship".
Yeah, some of them were other types of dictatorships :yeah:

Originally posted by ecadre
The Communist Party has NEVER called for "murdering people". A peaceful revolution is what we want, unfortunately those with power, wealth and control often want to hang on to it violently.
When you try to steal from people and they protect their property, its THEIR violence that started it all, right.
Perhaps that is why communist movements embraced the 'pre-emptive murder' policy where-ever they cropped up?


Originally posted by ecadre
A short list of European countries where Communist Parties have been banned at different times (i know that I have left some off this list as it is from memory);

Ireland
Finland
Denmark
Portugal
Spain
France
Germany
Austria
Italy
Romania
Hungary
Albania
Russia
Bulgaria
Czehoslovakia
Poland
Norway
:spank: Tisk, tisk, the dirty history of these democratic nations come out.

Originally posted by ecadre
Communists have been murdered, put on show trials, had their political rights oppressed and been hounded and repressed in all european countries - to this day.
:lol: Don't like it when the tables are turned on them, do they? Sounds like the capitalists in my family for a few decades in one of those 'workers paradises'.

Originally posted by Sean Lindstrom
People who have had little positive exposure to socialism in action will naturally view communism as alien and outrageous. Even socialism seems exotic to some people.
Perhaps that is because little positive actually came of these policies, as embraced by the countries discussed here.

Not the fact that both Furry & me, two of the most ardent insulters of communism in this discussion, both are members of families that ran away from Communist countries and have had first hand accounts of what happened there, and what it was like. Exotic? Hardly.

Originally posted by CruddyLeper
It is not a redundant point to consider that any country that forbids free and fair elections is a potential candidate for a Communist revolution attempt.
No, its redundant that any country that forbids free & fair elections is not going to allow Communists to participate.

Originally posted by CruddyLeper
It is a grave mistake to think that any country that wants a Communism government can simply vote for one. Try to look at it from a perspective outside of the "rich North" experience, eh?
Well, I never made such a claim :)

But the 'rich North' experience was what we're talking about. For a democratic Communist state to exist, democracy has to exist, right?
 
Originally posted by Greadius

Well, I never made such a claim :)

But the 'rich North' experience was what we're talking about. For a democratic Communist state to exist, democracy has to exist, right?

No Greadius, you did not state that. You implied it.

Agreed on the second point.
 
CruddyLeper: My country is not rich and is not on the North. But we have a great variety of communist partys over here. All partys are allowed in Brazil(a poor southern country).
A few exemples:

PCB(Communist Brazilian Party)
PCdoB(Communist Party of Brazil)
PSTU(Unified Workers Socialist Party)
PCO(Operarians Cause Party)
PSB(Socialist Brazilian Party)
PPS(Popular Socialist Party)

and many, many more...
all legalized. if the people want, they are 100% free to vote on this crap.
 
Originally posted by XIII
[sarcasm]Bah, nothing new about that. We Chinese have been killing those pesky Christian missionaries (and occasionally their converts) fr long before Communism. :p

Fancy those strange-dressing bearded weirdos coming into your cities telling you you're 'heathens' and need to convert to the worship of the 'true and only one God'. :p And mostimes, under the protection of European powers interested in spreading 'civilisation', in the homeland of the oldest living civilisation on Earth.

Bah. [/sarcasm]

Thing is - Christianity has a less-than-favourable history (and especially association with the European imperial powers preying on the nation) in China, and is still viewed somewhat suspiciously.

I agree with you that it has had a less than favourable past. I know you are not condonig what is happening, and i didn't mean to pick solely on China, but that is a communist state that has a long history of killing people of religious groups and it was the first that came to my mind as i know some missionaries who worked there. But remember that Communism has a less than favourable history too, the sword is double edged.

And quite frankly i think that ecadre's comments about the poor commies around the world is a very childish poorly thought out arguement. Although what is happening to them is wrong, depending on the circumstances (ie, if they are trying to cause a revolt i can see the actions of military and government being correct), it doesn't change the fact that Stalin killed more people than Hitler did (just to give a scope as to the numbers). If anyone can name me one communist state which has had fewer human rights abuses than any countries which exist today, and less poverty than any capitalist states today then perhapse communism may work. And by human rights i mean the standard, freedom to believe what you want without the threat of being killed along with freedom of speech and freedom of the press. THe problem is Communism doesn't allow that.

Read the communist manifesto. I just love the last part
taken from http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch04.htm
The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a communist revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.

Oh yes forcible sounds like peaceful. I'm glad that was cleared up.
 
double post, busy server right now
 
Small point I would like to make to those who keep talking about Marx:

Not all of us left-wingers are Marxist.

Just because I have views which are often similar to those of Marx does not mean I am a Marxist.

I get branded a communist because I belive in idea's of equality, yet when I point out I am not a Marxist often people say that means I am not communist.

I think people should stop going on about Marx all the time when they talk about communism, I for one am a left-winger who believes that we need to adapt to modern times rather than focusing on Marx's outdated writings.
 
I really, really made the effort to avoid this thread because I knew it would devolve into the usual idiotic arguments but my will cracked and I peeked. So here I am. Again.

ecadre wrote:

A crude analysis, there is a wide ranging debate in Communist Parties about the different socialist countries, we would certainly not describe them as "cruel dictatorship".

Why not? We did. If it walks like a duck, and looks like a duck...

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason 3: Communism calls for blood shed. This is closely related to reason 2. If you need a bloody revolution then i don't see how it can be supported. It calls for murdering people. That in and of itself is moraly distasteful to me.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Communist Party has NEVER called for "murdering people". A peaceful revolution is what we want, unfortunately those with power, wealth and control often want to hang on to it violently.

Actually, although it depends which communist party you're talking about, the Soviet and Chinese-inspired communist parties do call for bloodshed and extermination of their respective bogeymen. Of course they didn't use the word "murder" because that implies a crime is being committed, but nonetheless we were taught from an early age that we needed to be absolutely ruthless with the bourgoisie, including mass extermination if need be. The concept of the Red Terror was glorified with "heroic" stories of land and business owners getting their come-upance at the end of a rope or a bullet. Remember that pre-teens were getting military training in Communist eastern Europe until 1990 or so. What was your grade in grenade-tossing?

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason 4: It bans religion. Religion is the opiate of the people according to Marx. Marx believed that Religion needed to be outlawed as it blinded people to the pains they experience on earth as they are contented as they wait for pleasures in the afterlife. Depending on who you talk to they may beleive the same thing. However, why should they be able to force beliefs on people. The Church was criticized for burning people at the steaks as heretics if they were not what is now Roman Catholic. Communism essentially does the same thing. If you aren't and athiest we will shoot you in the head.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What utter garbage. Where was the present Pope born?? Are you really are this ignorant?

Bad analogy. The current Pope, as Karol Wojtyla, Bishop of Kraków, was an ardent anti-communist who had repeated brushes with the communists. The communists in Poland couldn't shut down the churches because the Catholic church had become too powerful an organization and one that specialized in organizing resistance, after 123 years of foreign rule in Poland (1795-1918). The communists did imprison the Polish primate, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski, in the early 1950s and murdered many rural priests but they knew they were too weak to take on the church as a whole - not without sparking a revolution.

In Hungary there was no monolithic church as Hungarians are divided between the Roman Catholic and an old Calvinist Protestant denomination, Reformism, so in the 1950s they imprisoned the Catholic cardinal József Mindszenty for years (after he'd spent years in jail for opposing Hungary's German collaboration in WW II). In the 1956 Revolution Mindszenty escaped his captors and found safe haven in the American Embassy in Budapest, but he couldn't leave that building until a deal was finally worked out between Budapest and Washington in 1971 allowing Mindszenty to leave Hungary for the Vatican.

Even in the "softer" communist regimes like Poland or Hungary, in the 1950s Stalinist period it was extremely dangerous to be too active with any church publically. Many people were murdered for their beliefs in this period. After the post-Stalinist period set in then the communists largely stopped murdering believers although every once in a while an outspoken priest would "disappear". Remember the Polish priest Jerzy Popieluszko getting beaten to death by the SB (Polish version of KGB) in 1984 for his outspoken sermons on human rights in Poland? Even after the murdering generally stopped though it could still be dangerous to visit church regularly; it could effect your ability to get a job, a promotion, food ration cards, your children's ability to get into a good school, or many other bureaucratic realities of life in a communist state. As late as the late 1980s the communists still sent secret agents to church services to write down the names of people who were attending. Hungary by the 1980s was far more lenient than Poland, but I know of several families who sent children on triups to Western Europe on convenient excuses to have them baptised or receive their First Communion, away from Budapests' prying eyes.

Poland and Hungary were relatively soft cases though; Romania under Ceausescu and Albania under both Hoxha and Alia declared open war on religion, murdering untold thousands connected to churches and destroying much church property, some of it centuries old.

Have a look at Communist Party websites (the British or US ones would be good for English speakers) and do a search on "religion". This will give you the facts of what Communists are ACTUALLY saying, rather than the prejudiced nonsense above.

The old American communist party, led by Gus Hall, also used to denounce religion. Harold J. Laski, the eminent 1940s British communist, also talked of trashing the Church of England. Don't know what those buggers are saying nowadays but we in Eastern Europe were told that our American and British comrades were shoulder-to-shoulder with us on their hostility to religion. You may want to check out some of Karl Marx's readings to get a better understanding of communists' attitudes towards religion.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Those are just a few of the reasons i hate communism.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hate is a big emotion, for myself I hate, poverty, war, exploitation and oppression, how about you?

So do I. Sadly, communism brought all of these things to Eastern Europe.

And for peoples information, Communist Parties have been banned at different times in vitually every country in the world.

A short list of European countries where Communist Parties have been banned at different times (i know that I have left some off this list as it is from memory);

Ireland
Finland
Denmark
Portugal
Spain
France
Germany
Austria
Italy
Romania
Hungary
Albania
Russia
Bulgaria
Czehoslovakia
Poland
Norway


First, the operative word is when. Poland banned the communist party of Poland in the interbellum years (1920-1939) because it wasn't just another political party, it was one that advocated the violent overthrow of the government and the mass-enslavement of society. The Polish Communist Party (KPP) was directly funded and controlled by the USSR, and amazingly the KPP advocated every single foreign policy goal of the USSR including those contrary to Poland's own interests. :hmm:

The USSR went on to become an ally of Hitler's and divide Eastern Europe (including Poland) between them, just like good old fashioned imperialists. Hitler invaded Poland on 01. September, Stlain joined in on the 17th. You might want to check out Jan T. Gross' book (now in English) Revolution From Abroad, which details the massacres the Soviets carried out among Poles, Ukrainians and Ruthenians during their 1939-1941 occupation of eastern Poland. My family lived in this region at that time, and my wife's grandfather (an officer in the Polish Army) was very nearly sent to the Soviet POW camps for officers at Katyn - where the USSR murdered more than 14,000 unarmed Polish officers in 1941 (as Moscow admitted in 1990).

Secondly, want to hear something really funny about the KPP? It met its extinction from a surprising source, although we shouldn't be surprised. Stalin, who had a maniacal hatred for Poles, summoned the entire cadre of the KPP to Moscow in 1938 and Stalin had every single one of them either imprisoned or executed. The KPP was de-recognized and dissolved by Comintern. A mid-level communist member, Wladyslaw Gomulka, was saved from being murdered by his Soviet "comrades" simply because he had been arrested by the Polish authorities for being a communist agent and was sitting in a prison cell when Stalin summoned the KPP to Moscow. Isn't that a hoot? A Polish prison saved this bast*rd's life. Because the top leadership of the KPP was wiped out by Stalin, Gomulka became the party's leader during WW II (now that's a promotion process!) and after the war when the Soviets imposed a communist regime on Poland in 1944. Stalin still didn't trust Gomulka and he had him arrested and imprisoned in 1951 (like in all his puppet regimes in Eastern Europe from 1947-1951), but Gomulka was released and able to claw back into power after a military confrontation with the Soviets in 1956. (Here is a link to an old quiz I did on the events of 1956 in the History forums if you're interested.) He was booted from power in 1970 after having peaceful workers who were protesting price increases shot down in the streets with tanks and army helicopters. Good riddance.

Communists have been murdered, put on show trials, had their political rights oppressed and been hounded and repressed in all european countries - to this day.

First of all, bullsh*t. Communists have been elected to office in France, Italy and San Marino, and have enjoyed open political access and activity throughout all of Europe since 1945. Yes, some were persecuted prior to 1939 but so were many other political groups, democrats included. Get over it. I've had to sludge through tons of crapola published by Western European communists, all published in the West and without political fear, while only the communist press was allowed in Eastern Europe. I have no problem with letting them stand in open elections like any other party and indeed they do in Eastern Europe, but let's not forget that no political group - and that includes the Nazis - has killed more people than commmunism. That's one of the reasons the old communist parties all had to undergo substantial image and ideological overhauls after 1989 in Europe, because their bankrupt beliefs had been exposed to the light of day and hadn't fared well.

I've lived under communists, and have no desire to wish them on anyone else ever. I remember after the Hungarian communist government came unravelled at the end of 1989 seeing a bunch of old, embittered commies flocking to a small bar in my unversity city called Denevér ("The Bat") to drown their sorrows at having lost power; that's when I knew it was going to be a better world. :D

Allow me to recite something I'd posted in another thread, in another forum:

Fascism was able to live itself out and die a spectacular bunker death in the world's worst war, discrediting it for everyone except a few fringe freaks. Communism also proved itself an utter failure, murdering far more people (almost all of them its own citizens) than fascism could dream of, and yet there are still so many young people today in the West who think it has validity. What the hell does a political theory have to do for them to consider it a failure? It can murder large chunks of its population, collapse the economy, create mass poverty, destroy living standards, create a tyranny for its citizens, restrict all travel, imprison anyone who dissents or even looks like they'll dissent, and cap it off by creating one of the most militarized societies since Sparta - and someone still looks at this and thinks it might be a good idea?

I capped this rant with a nice "WTH" smiley but as no such option exists here, I will settle for this one:

:rant:
 
http://www3.baylor.edu/~Scott_Moore/texts/Marx_Opium.html
this would be a reading that i have pulled up. THis is one of Marx's articles. I believe it will open ones eyes about Marx's views.

ComradeDavo wroted:

Small point I would like to make to those who keep talking about Marx:

Not all of us left-wingers are Marxist.

Just because I have views which are often similar to those of Marx does not mean I am a Marxist.

I get branded a communist because I belive in idea's of equality, yet when I point out I am not a Marxist often people say that means I am not communist.

I think people should stop going on about Marx all the time when they talk about communism, I for one am a left-winger who believes that we need to adapt to modern times rather than focusing on Marx's outdated writings.

You keep pounding the idea of equality. However, this leads to a problem. What do you want? Equality or Freedom. People aren't naturally equal, just look at it. Some are better athletes than others, while others are better at math, others are better with social skills. Economic inequality is also another problem when you look at it.

If everyone is made equal economically, that would also imply socially, as economic status is very closely related to social status. As there is currently economic inequality, someone would need to force the equality. The money or assets would need to be taken from the "rich" and given to the "poor". This takes away freedom. I personaly don't want my stereo to be taken from me and given to someone else. I don't want money that I worked for to be taken from me. I want the freedom to buy a better car if i wish. I want the freeedom to have a bigger home, I want the freedom to be able to work harder than the guy next to me and then earn more money as a reward.

The next problem with equality economically. The phrase developed in the USSR. "I work just hard enough to not get shot." That phrase sums it up. If everyone has the same economic power no matter what, what would be ones motivation to work harder? WHy should i bust my hump and make a good product, even if I sell more of it, and still be paid the same as a guy who makes a product that falls apart twice as fast as my product, but he gets to go home earlier than me? That is a problem that comes up with the idea of economic equality. Communism, Marxist or not is based upon the idea that people will do what is best for everyone. I believe that history has shown that people will do what is best for themselves.If it happens to help others thats a bonus. But most people think under the premise of "look out for number one". Even if half the people don't think that way, it still leads to a collapse of the economic situation as you then have to have 50% of the population picking up the slack of the other 50%.

If someone forces others to work, then you get a dictatorship like every other communist country the world has seen
 
Furry Spatula, you don't have freedom in capitalist counties either.

As I have said many a time before, I be realistic in saying I would like it to be as close to communism as possible. And it will take along time.
 
Originally posted by ComradeDavo
Furry Spatula, you don't have freedom in capitalist counties either.

Indeed, no country has unlimited freedom, but capitalist countries are far, far, freer than a communist country would be.
 
Archbishop Helder Camara of Recife in Brazil:

"When I give bread to the poor, they call me a saint; but when I ask why people are poor, they call me a communist."

A great man. Look him up (try a Google search or this [url http://library.trinity.wa.edu.au/camp/hands/christians/camara.htm]link to start with[/url]).

I'm not going to even try to answer every point made in other posts, other than to say that some people still haven't actually bothered read and question things for themselves.

Willful ignorance is an ugly thing when it breeds prejudice.

A few links.

* [url http://www.communist-party.org.uk]Communist Party of Britain[/url] - gosh, a Communist Party website, one might even find out what Communists are actually saying and believe.

* [url http://www.communist-party.org.uk/home/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=71]Question everything[/url] - the start of ANY theoretical and scientific analysis.

The following articles deal with the "communists killed more people than the nazis" propaganda (with some comments about what we really think about Stalin etc mostly in article 3)

* [url http://www.communist-party.org.uk/home/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=49]The New Wave of Anti-Communism: Part 1[/url]

* [url http://www.communist-party.org.uk/home/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=50]The New Wave of Anti-Communism: Part 2[/url]

* [url http://www.communist-party.org.uk/home/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=51]The New Wave of Anti-Communism: Part 3[/url]

Three articles for those who were sadly incapable of doing a search on religion at the Communist Party of Britain's website.

There is quite a debate about religion, and there always has been. Geof Bottoms, by the way is a Vicar, and a member of the Communist Party. There are others like him.

* [url http://www.communist-party.org.uk/home/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=32]Marxism and religion debate: Part 1[/url]

* [url http://www.communist-party.org.uk/home/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=33]Marxism and religion debate: Part 2[/url]

* [url http://www.communist-party.org.uk/home/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=34]Marxism and religion debate: Part 3[/url]

That's all for now folks :-)
 
you can debate wheather the USSR was real communism or not. However the fact remains that every country that has attempted a change into communism has turned into that kind of a police state. THink of it this way. Either communism isn't able to be implemented. Or it is able to be implemented however eveyone else involved in the revolutions were just very very niave. Take your pick.
 
Originally posted by ComradeDavo
Just because I have views which are often similar to those of Marx does not mean I am a Marxist.

One may basically agree with Darwin's revolutionary theory of evolution, though Darwin was wrong on many points. After all we've done with his ideas, there's no point in being a Darwinist today. One may accept Freud's theory of the subconscious, and appreciate many of his revolutionary ideas (e.g. dreams mean something), without petting the man, or calling oneself a Freudian. So it is with the genius Karl Marx.
 
http://www.communist-party.org.uk/home/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=71

ok I've read that one. Now lets look at something
www.Dictionary.com

Imperialism
1) The policy of extending a nation's authority by territorial acquisition or by the establishment of economic and political hegemony over other nations.
2) The system, policies, or practices of such a government.

Well communism calls for a world wide change. Communsim calls for workers of the world to unite. That page proved nothing other than the hypocracy of it all. Look at it this way. America is evil because it is spreading capitalism around the world to all countries it can. It is Capitalist Imperialsim. However this site ignores the fact of Communist Imperialism. Take dictionary.com's definition and replace nation with political/economic system and then you see the hypocracy of communism in its bashing of Capitalsim for being Imperialistic.
 
I said that Iwasn't going to come back at each point made by other contributers, but I couldn't resist this one.


Originally posted by Vrylakas
Harold J. Laski, the eminent 1940s British communist also talked of trashing the Church of England.

Harold Laski a communist ??!!!???!!!

You really have to do better than this. If that is really the level of your knowledge then I suppose it explains all of your other flights of fantasy.

**********
For your information, Harold J. Laski was a leading member of the Fabian Society from the early 1920' onwards, Labour Party Exective member from 1936 and Labour Party chair 1945/46.

Communist, ha!
 
I'm going to attempt to bow out of this thread. It appears that there are 2 kinds of people. THose who realize what communism has become the past 10+ attempts to establish communist states and have lived under or seen the lives of those who live in these states. ANd those who refuse to believe that. YOu all know where I stand, and there isn't anything I'll be able to do to change your mind. However as Vrylakas has stated he/she had a similar experience to that of my parents. THey know what communism turns to.
 
Originally posted by ecadre
I said that Iwasn't going to come back at each point made by other contributers, but I couldn't resist this one.




Harold Laski a communist ??!!!???!!!

You really have to do better than this. If that is really the level of your knowledge then I suppose it explains all of your other flights of fantasy.

**********
For your information, Harold J. Laski was a leading member of the Fabian Society from the early 1920' onwards, Labour Party Exective member from 1936 and Labour Party chair 1945/46.

Communist, ha!

I said I'm attempting to get out :D

Ecardre, if this is your level of knowledge of arguing then i feel bad for you and your flights of fanatasy. You think that one line in someones post discredits the entire thing? Well in that case your posts are all complete garbage as you fail to recognize that COmmunism brougth poverty, war, opression and exploitation to all countries behind the iron Curtain. If you refuse to believe this you are denying history. You are denying reality. The fact is that is what Europe was like.

Now I'll try to stay out again
 
Originally posted by Furry Spatula


I said I'm attempting to get out :D

Ecardre, if this is your level of knowledge of arguing then i feel bad for you and your flights of fanatasy. You think that one line in someones post discredits the entire thing? Well in that case your posts are all complete garbage as you fail to recognize that COmmunism brougth poverty, war, opression and exploitation to all countries behind the iron Curtain. If you refuse to believe this you are denying history. You are denying reality. The fact is that is what Europe was like.

Now I'll try to stay out again

Hmmm, I could make the same comments about your so called "reality", but when a discussion gets down to the level of who can throw the most insults or make the most simple assertions it ceases being useful. Or indeed any sort of discussion.

You say my posts are garbage, I say your posts are garbage...... let's let everybody make up their own minds, follow some of the links, read for yourself and remember:-

QUESTION EVERYTHING !
 
Well i was just making that comment because you seem to love to pull out one sentance or two and then say it discredits the entire post. And as you said you could do the same to me. THat was my point. essentially.

Anyhow, i agree question everything. And make sure that you don't get into a dictatorship regardless of economic system and political system you are in. I was just stating that the every communist country has turned into a dictatorship which causes me to be very very skeptical of communists.
 
Originally posted by Furry Spatula
I'm going to attempt to bow out of this thread. It appears that there are 2 kinds of people. THose who realize what communism has become the past 10+ attempts to establish communist states and have lived under or seen the lives of those who live in these states. ANd those who refuse to believe that. YOu all know where I stand, and there isn't anything I'll be able to do to change your mind. However as Vrylakas has stated he/she had a similar experience to that of my parents. THey know what communism turns to.

Wanna talk about bad experiences?

During the military dictatorships in South America, my uncle was captured and tortured severily by the government.

A government that took pride of being capitalistic and that had the fight against communism as one of it's major goals, to the point of invading student's houses to check if the books they were studying were "subversive", planting spies in schools and killing artists and thinkers.

Now, I'm not bashing either capitalism OR communism.

However, when I see people presenting this question as communism = dictatorship, capitalism = freedom, I can only laugh at their naivety. Dictatorship, and it's horrors, are not privilege of either system.

The bad experience communism (socialism) offered to the countries that tried it has showed only that imposing a philosophy that relies on the enhancement of the human spirit by armed resolution is sillyness. The term "revolution of the proletarian" is an allegory that indicate a moment when the labor class would acknowledge it's power and learn how to use it ... not an invitation to decaptate Czars.

If one day communism will come, it will be under natural development, not by an aggressive taking over conducted by ruthless men such as Lenin and Stalin. It's a pity that their "fac-símile" of communism has really branded it as something bad in the heads of so many people.

Was communism, as experienced, good? Of course not. No honest man can deny that.

However, to demonize a philosophy that searches for justice and equality, that has such elevated goals as it's core, is unfair.

Is communism impossible because it does not fit the human's spirit? That may be. Maybe we are too primitive to behave in a way that could allow us to hope having a system that bases itself in sharing instead of owning.

However, humanity has enhanced in many ways through the centuries. Things that we accept today as common sense, like caring for the environment, being good to animals, respecting the rights of other people and other nations, engaging war only as the last option and never as the aggressor, among many other, all those things would sound like an alien dream to a person of, say, the 17th century.

As a humanist, I believe that one day - not in my lifetime, but one day - humanity will be better than it is now, so the human nature will never again be a credible argument against the implementation of communism.

Maybe time will prove me wrong.

But will anyone feel victorious if it does?

Regards :).
 
Back
Top Bottom