Conquering the World before 0BC

IT IS obvious that he is not playing with the settings:
large world map...e.g world_mp
restart eliminated players
7 civs
raging hordes
deity

and the other settings normal.
 
Don't you guys just love bullfeathers? Conquest is no fun that early. You could probably do that on a tiny map with one other civ on chieftain, but why? I like conquest only when well industrialized and I've expanded as far as I could on my own territory.
 
i set it to month increments, lower tech speed, then save as scenario. i cant stand it taking a warrier 500 years to go a few squares. also, i like low tech speed so there can be distinct phases, and not just having a unit for a few turns then getting a new one.
 
So I guess majority of us prefers to build large massive empires against going all out to conquer th world in a few turns.
 
We should definitely play sometime CMH, you do *exactly* the same thing as me! I also prefer to make time progress slower and tech as well, thus more enjoying every "era" of time instead of barely being able to upgrade my phalanxes to musketeers before I discover conscription and/or tactics...

pimp.gif
 
Well, armor by 800 A.D. on chief and warlord is easy. Conquering the world by 1000 B.C. is not. I can kill 5-6 civ by the time 500B.C. rolls around on warlord but when I kill one early another one randomly pops up. Its so annoying!

------------------
Join me in World Conquest

<FONT COLOR="blue"><FONT face="lucida handwriting">
Would ya shoot someone? What if he also had a gun pointing at you?

</FONT c></FONT f>

Check out Arcade Portal and
 
Once I have reached a higher level, I dont like to go back and finish the game again at a lower level.Its just too boring.
 
Back
Top Bottom