Jethro-tron hi,
Well i think u'r totally wrong:
1. No way the Merkava is a Cheap to build. I know it takes a lot of time to build them.
2. There are many cases where this method of development it used (with other names). This method doesn't cause worse outcome. Sometimes its even better:
At the first phase u build the chassis and engine and uses off shelf parts for the more sophisticaed elements. Over time after gainig more experinse u replace the off-shelp part with new ones.
There is no wrong with doing that, this is called PIPE method.
Anyway the operational tanks have gone through all phases...
Last thing,
I don't know why many pepole at this thread thinks that the Merkave have reduced armour for better performance ???
On the tradeoff of MBTs Armour/Mobility/Firepower the thing which the Merkava sets at its highest priority is its Armour !!!

Well i think u'r totally wrong:
1. No way the Merkava is a Cheap to build. I know it takes a lot of time to build them.
2. There are many cases where this method of development it used (with other names). This method doesn't cause worse outcome. Sometimes its even better:
At the first phase u build the chassis and engine and uses off shelf parts for the more sophisticaed elements. Over time after gainig more experinse u replace the off-shelp part with new ones.
There is no wrong with doing that, this is called PIPE method.
Anyway the operational tanks have gone through all phases...
Last thing,
I don't know why many pepole at this thread thinks that the Merkave have reduced armour for better performance ???
On the tradeoff of MBTs Armour/Mobility/Firepower the thing which the Merkava sets at its highest priority is its Armour !!!
