Crises of the New World Order

No country want foreign countries to look over their shoulder and look at what they are doing. Now we expect a public aplogy from the European Union as well.
 
Direct Communique from President Mordhiem

To: Chinese Ambassador to the EU
CC: US Ambassador to the EU, Indian Ambassador to the EU, Russian Ambasador to the EU
Author: EU President Mordhiem
Subject: AWAC Incident

I have difficulty understanding why my old friend the Chairman is willing to kick up such a controvversy over a seemingly tiny act. I can understand why the good Chairman is concerned over protcting his airspace but cannot fathom as to why he is willing to be so aggressive over the matter. I also find the statement "No country want foreign countries to look over their shoulder and look at what they are doing." a very defensive and intrinsicly guilty response. The EU however has absolutley nothing to hide and are willing to provide details of troop movements to anyone whom asks for them. We do not prosocute anyone who sends AWACS into our territory since we know that they will find nothing to concern them, besides we would be doing the same in thier position. Our recent AWAC searches across the Atlantic and into Russia have confirmed what we already knew, that the US and Russia pose no threat to us. These countries did nott object to any AWAC survaillance, they are not concerned by it. I am interested to know why the Chinese government are.
 
To the UN Security Council and also to India:

The Russian Federation has not, from the start of this 'enflamed' incident, denied that it flies aircraft into China. The aircraft fly into, I might add, an area of land formerly a Russian S.S.R. and recently invaded by the Chinese. Russia has also sent planes into the 'airspace' of the EU and the so-called 'neutrals', and have they complained? I think not. We support the EU in its effort to give detailed reports on its military, and, we believe that all nations-big and small-should follow this policy. If this policy were followed, there would be no flaring up of old Cold War tensions between China and Russia. Perhaps they do, as my esteemed European colleague suggested, have something to hide. This would be a perfect excuse to launch an attack on the poorly defended region of Siberia.

Boris Yeltsin
President, Russian Federation
 
To United States and European Union:

India is interested in the advanced technologies of your countries. We are willing to pay for the fees of your scientists to visit Delhi and explain these various ideas and innovations to us. We are also interested in paying you for helping us with nuclear arms dismantling.

To UN Security Council:

The Taliban Regime represents a growing threat to the states of Pakistan, India, Russia, China, Uzbekistan, and others. It combines the rogue states of Iran, Iraq, Yemen, and now Afghanistan into one collective area of the planet. I propose a joint effort of peacekeeping in the area. Once we are finished with our regime change we can then allow the Neutrals or Allies to take control of the country.
 
The Russian economy is still struggling to create a surplus, but it is getting there.

Also, as an alert to the US and EU. Two FFG Frigates and one AEGIS Cruiser are in your territorital waters, the Atlantic!! Watch out!! :D
 
To India:
What technologies are you interested in?

To the UN security council:
The USA supports the Indian proposal and are willing to pledge a carrier group to support this action.

To Russia:
Thanks for the warning.;)
 
To Russia and The European Union:
This has nothing to with whether we give you details of our miltary operations or not. China have nothing to hide, and welcomes everyone to check out for them selves, but for the sake of peace, do ask in advance. When you look over ones shoulder you can make the feeling that you suspect the somebody in any way. Some times you have good reasons for your suspicion, the other times not. And those not's are very important. We need to trust each other, an agreement can not be reached by only one side agreeing. Despite the fact that we sent one of our best diplomats over to Russia and told them that should not feel our operations as act of agression poited towards them, they sent over a spyplane to check out for them selves. Now what message does that give? Our operations where only to secure our borders and fight militant terrorists and we will not tolerate such acts in the future, I hope that I am making myself very clear on this matter. Do not violate our suvereignity.

But by all means, send in an AWACS or whatever plane it should be, just ask in advance, or at least tell us about it. We had to find the plane our selves. This was without doubt a violation of interational laws, this was spying.


To the UN security council:
About the Taliban-matter, this proposal has already been vetoed by the Russians, and is dead. Am I correct?
 
Originally posted by Leglaen
However, the Russian member of the Security Council has been ordered to veto the proposed vote to eradicate the taliban, whom are not a nuisance to anyone. We agree with the Chinese on this issue.
 
Perhaps they do, as my esteemed European colleague suggested, have something to hide. This would be a perfect excuse to launch an attack on the poorly defended region of Siberia.

How would that benefit the people of China? Wich in fact is a people's republic. This is just pathetic!
 
There is no reason that the US and India could not mount thier own seperate operation.

If this operation does go ahead you can count on EU support, although we may have difficulty transporting military forces to Kabul.
 
To India:
After some consideration we have decided to pull out of the planned operation against the taliban. The American people have yet to see the danger the taliban pose to the world community.

The resolution was vetoed in the security council. We will continue watching the taliban and should they threaten any nations we will be there to offer our help.

To EU: We are interested in trading you Freedom of Information for Nuclear disarmament.
 
If any power is attacked, then Russia will agree to a resolution to rid the Afghanis from power.
 
If any nations are threatened by the Taliban-regime, China will agree to an attack as well. China will commit 100% to protect India.
 
Will China also be willing to play the turn ;)
 
Damn! I seem to always forget, sorry guys...Let's just hope this is not a pattern...:crazyeye:
 
Indian Prime Minister Assasinated!!!

- Colombo- In India's peacekeeping mission in Sri Lanka, halting the civil war there, peace seemed almost upon the land. But we were wrong. A raid by terrorists on the Prime Minister's convoy was launched, with machinegun fire and RPGs. The Prime Minister is believed to have been killed instantly by a high powered bullet through the window. The convoy killed most of the assailants and is currently attempting to identify their organization and leader, as prime officials have disproved the possibility that it was Sri Lankan rebels. A new Prime Minister is expected to be sworn in within a month; for now, the Parliament is taking an executive role.

Sri Lankan rebels raid Colombo

A large group of rebels attacked the bases of Indian troops attemtping to restore order to the island. Such a massacre ensued that over 1000 Indian marines died, making it the bloodiest event of recent Indian events. The last garrison of the city was ordered to evacuate and allow time for recuperation. We will not be involved with Sri Lanka unless the UN pleges forces for the reconstruction and defense of the island.

Indian Parliament Chairman Speaks Against Chinese Invasions

The Parliament proclaims that the recent Chinese invasions of central Asia is uncalled for, and you must retreat. War should be a thing of the past, as politics are now fought with words, money, and debates. Please halt your invasions for the world's sake.

However if you are choosing to take over the lands of those cities in order to improve them and then let the Unnaligned or Allies re-take them, then I guess that's fine as long as you don't do that to everyone. ;) That's what I am planning to do with Sri Lanka.
 
Message from the president of the United States
To: Chairman Eivind

A couple of days ago you promised the withdrawal of your forces from Taiwan. I was surprised to hear that they were still there. This lack of respect for me, the world community and most importantly the people of Taiwan is shocking.

Do you have any explanation for this?
 
To: President Pavlov, and the all the world leaders

Sorry, sorry, sorry!:cringe:

I simply forgot to withdraw them on my turn. They are fortified on Taiwan, so I just oversaw them. I am honestly and sincerly sorry. This will be my 1st priority on my next turn. I did though demilitarize the area around Taiwan. I mooved all my forces away from the open ocean wich seperates China from Taiwan, just so that the people of Taiwan would not feel threatened by an invasion. I hope that we can settle this like civilized people and understand that every man can make a mistake. This has nothing to do with lack of respect, just a simple clerical error. Someone in the administration in Beijing will get their asses wooped.:spank:

Hope you can forgive me...:o
 
Back
Top Bottom