sophie
Break My Heart
What they should be doing is picking a better start date for the game.
What date did you have in mind and why don't you like 1066?
What date did you have in mind and why don't you like 1066?
I'd rather it be much earlier. Getting to play in the heptarchy, for example, or in the Carolingian/Merovingian periods. Or Germany pre-Otto I.
Failing that I wish they put more elements of this game in EU3.
I've founded that releasing a few prisoners without ransom works wonders as a temporary quick-fix for other underlying issues with your reputation.
I've founded that releasing a few prisoners without ransom works wonders as a temporary quick-fix for other underlying issues with your reputation.
The problem with the Carolingian/Meroviginian periods is that the game will have gigantic empire-blobs of terror that make the "unbalanced" Fatimids look like a joke in comparison (massive Abbasid Caliphate spanning, literally, half the map, for instance), as well as other balance issues. Another issue would be how to simulate the massive amount of migrations into Europe properly - wave after wave of nomadic groups and the like, which won't be easy to implement using the current game's culture mechanics (which are already screwed up anyways). This is not to mention the great amounts of research necessary for the dev team in terms of character, dynasty, and title history.
In essence, in my opinion, any start before c. 1000 (and the early 900s if I want to be really, really generous) would require an essentially different game with a different focus than what CKII currently offers.
Meh. 1066 start is just so...boring.
Anyway EU3 is the period that really could have used a system like CKII's. It's much more relevant to that time period than this one, I think.
Also for some reason, the Byzie emprah has a county in the piedmont. I checked the province history and he had it before I started playing.