Leoreth, are you likely to change the CIV4LeaderHeadInfo file between the current SVN? I'm planning on making a mod that changes a few diplomacy musics and wondering if working on it right now would make it a lot of work to later make it work for 1.11 because of an updated file.
Current (SVN) development discussion thread
- Thread starter Leoreth
- Start date
What define the autoraze? What define the "developed cities" ?
I'd like to know please
imo the definition should be based on era (and certain type of basic building) if it hasn't already because "developed cities" of Roman era definition must be different from current era definition.
Also, on the other note..
Since Gran Colombia is a respawn of Maya and is not included in Civ list, does it mean that Gran Colombia spawn is dynamic?
blizzrd
Micromanager
Holy cities cannot be razed.
By 'autoraze', I think he means cities of size 1, that aren't holy cities, are automatically razed when captured IIRC.
So if you want to stop it being razed you need more defenders, to stop the barbs razing it, and also make it larger to ensure it isn't automatically razed if an AI civ captures it.
That's why more defenders are also needed. I think blizzrd's point was that an AI civ will never raze a city unless it is pop 1 and not holy.
So if we want a city to survive, it must have sufficient defenders to avoid being captured and potentially razed by barbs, and also must be at least size 2 to ensure that it is not autorazed if captured by another civ.
DC123456789
Deity
Confirmed. I saw the Mongols spawn near Byzantine-held Abu Simbel, their only Egyptian city.
So AI will not city with population 2 in the middle of Sahara, only have build a granary, under stravation, and in Industrial era? I think it needs reform.
AI should be able to decide whether they want to keep a city or raze it, instead focusing on the "1 pop and no holy" condition. Since it's very hard to code AI, then I think re-define autoraze is much more viable.
AI should be able to decide whether they want to keep a city or raze it, instead focusing on the "1 pop and no holy" condition. Since it's very hard to code AI, then I think re-define autoraze is much more viable.
People are confusing a number of things right now. Autoraze is not an AI aspect, but a game rule. All cities with 1 population and without their first cultural expansion are automatically razed, for the human and the AI.
If autoraze is not in effect, the AI (not just barbarians) decides whether it should raze the city. This is based on the value of the city depending on a number of factors, and the willingness of the AI to raze cities in general (barbarians have a very high value here).
If autoraze is not in effect, the AI (not just barbarians) decides whether it should raze the city. This is based on the value of the city depending on a number of factors, and the willingness of the AI to raze cities in general (barbarians have a very high value here).
Locutus_Morti
Prince
Argentina and Brazil, both conditional.
Mexico and (Gran) Colombia are both represented as (semi?)-conditional respawns of the Aztecs and the Maya, respectively.
Mexico and (Gran) Colombia are both represented as (semi?)-conditional respawns of the Aztecs and the Maya, respectively.
Uh... yes. I think. I don't fully understand what you're asking. I moved it to the desktop, clicked SVN checkout, and then moved it back to Mods.
