Ah, didn't know that. I assumed from Mexico, Iran, and possibly Italy (I can never get straight how exactly they are related to the Romans in the mod) it had to be the same colour.
As for his personality... Simon Bolivar from Civ4Col?
Anyways, the revision with Colombia has been committed. Full stats:
Spawn: 1814 AD
Capital: Bogotá
Leader: Bolivar
Unique Unit: Albion Legion (Grenadier with 2 movement, starts with City Raider I)
Unique Building: Hacienda (Grocer with +25% gold with Coffee)
Unique Power: The Power of the Liberator: No resistance in conquered cities in Latin America
Unique Historical Victory:
- Allow no European colonies in Latin America in 1860 AD
- Control South America in 1920 AD
- Acquire 5000 gold by selling resources by 1950 AD
Unique Historical Victory:
- Allow no European colonies in Latin America in 1860 AD
- Control South America in 1920 AD
- Acquire 5000 gold by selling resources by 1950 AD
What counts towards the 3rd goal? Would selling techs and maps contribute for instance? Slaves? Or just trading resources for gold-per-turn agreements?
Is there any chance you could change the South American UBs to provide Yield bonuses instead of Commerce bonuses? That would make them more distinct from each other as well as more realistic IMO.
For example:
Columbian UB: +1 for all Plantations and Mines in the city's radius.
Brazilian UB: +1 for all Plantations and Farms in the city's radius.
Argentine UB: +1 , +1 for all Pastures in the city's radius.
What counts towards the 3rd goal? Would selling techs and maps contribute for instance? Slaves? Or just trading resources for gold-per-turn agreements?
I thought that was your intent. It is possible to demand gold-per-turn also though (from a weaker civ) or be gifted gold-per-turn from a friendly civ. Would these be differentiated in any way from the selling of resources?
I think a very big reason for India's tech rate is that they start with Iron Working. This gives them fast access to Compass which they often get before China (or anyone else) does.
Some adjustments may be needed. India spawns around the same time as Greece (who starts with Bronze Working instead of Iron Working), and yet with the same tech as Rome (Iron Working).
Since India spawns in 1500BC (Late Harappan/Early Vedic) they should be starting with Bronze Working rather than Iron Working. Moreover what they need is Axemen to defend against Persia, not Swordsmen.
I would also like to see a new UU for India, in addition to my 33 Devas UHV idea. Fast Worker is actually more boring in RFC than in vanilla BTS because India is a builder civ rather than a conqueror civ. Fast Worker becomes a meaningful advantage only when you're war mongering.
As blizzrd says you can extort or be gifted gold, or you can get it as part of a peace deal / capitulation. Tho' I reckon resources will be by far the biggest contributor.
Is there any chance you could change the South American UBs to provide Yield bonuses instead of Commerce bonuses? That would make them more distinct from each other as well as more realistic IMO.
I thought that was your intent. It is possible to demand gold-per-turn also though (from a weaker civ) or be gifted gold-per-turn from a friendly civ. Would these be differentiated in any way from the selling of resources?
One restart of the game itself would be necessary for the XML changes to take effect, but you should be able to continue your saved game and Colombia would still appear.
Just started playing as the French on the 1700 CE scenario on Marathon and got the message that I'd failed to first UHV condition (25,000 culture in Paris) at the end of the first turn. Might be an issue only in Marathon, since on Marathon the scenario starts in 1699.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
for all Plantations and Mines in the city's radius.
for all Plantations and Farms in the city's radius.
, +1 
