D-Day landings

Do you like my scenario?

  • Great! One of the Best!

    Votes: 20 37.7%
  • Good.

    Votes: 12 22.6%
  • Ok.

    Votes: 10 18.9%
  • Don't like it.

    Votes: 11 20.8%

  • Total voters
    53
i think the map and city placements is great, but some questions for the nations and its boundaries.... also, would be better i think to separate civs especially the important ones......
 
it is annoying since paris is the capital of germany, and the civilians resist. they should be french civilians. i don't know how to do it, but it gets really annoying to capture a french city, and the civilians are all german. also, can you turn off war wearyness because the civilians get tired of the war fast!
 
i agree with sarevok, just making the civs as axis or allies lessens the impact of the game... though i really admire the map used... :)
 
i dont understand what you two mean. do you mean split up germany, italy and hungery etc?

or do you mean the people in the cities?

if you mean the 2nd one, i dont think its possible to change what nationalities the civilians are.
 
Overlag - It would just about be possible - you would have to create the countries as not already taken over (like in the original scenario) then put no units in the cities but German units outside. Then have the germans as locked at war with those nations. This will only work for C3C though.
 
Originally posted by Phoenix
Overlag - It would just about be possible - you would have to create the countries as not already taken over (like in the original scenario) then put no units in the cities but German units outside. Then have the germans as locked at war with those nations. This will only work for C3C though.

lol good thinking, but that will be madness! lol
 
Man, how dare are you under estimate Great USSR. I understand that this is D-day. But you know we beat Germany up and took Berlin. USSR never were broken barbarians in east and UK or any allies had as much equepment as you are showing. However, for some people this is fun.
 
josephstalin said:
Man, how dare are you under estimate Great USSR. I understand that this is D-day. But you know we beat Germany up and took Berlin. USSR never were broken barbarians in east and UK or any allies had as much equepment as you are showing. However, for some people this is fun.
who did underestimate the USSR? i didnt see anyone say so?

infact my believe is the war was lost as soon as germany stepped foot on USSR soil. The americans helpped speed up the end, however USSR had already "won" it. Granted US Air power totaly destroyed Germanys output but, germany never really had enough man power to do anything vs the USSR, it needed to be quick, which is something you cant do vs something the size of 1/2 the globe.
 
oh...my...god...

WHY ALL THESE NOOBS!!!....man you guys need to read the rules they might just save you the embarrasment...

anyhow this was one of the first scenarios I ever played...It gave me much entertainment but doesn't compare to TCW, SOE, And WWII Global
 
Drivebymaster said:
It gave me much entertainment but doesn't compare to TCW, SOE, And WWII Global
TCW? SOE? WWII I know... of name at least because the size makes it... not playble for my PC.

I think it's OKay to bump old threads if it is to provide usefull information to other possible players. Which was NOT the case here.

However, writing messages saying "You just bumped a old scenario" also isn't much use, is it?! This type of messages just contributes to keeping the old scenario in the first page (which seems to be what irritates some players)!

I must say this scenario is fun for those people who like big and "confusing" scenarios... Allied troops are spread all around, having decisive strength in some areas and having a hard time in other areas.

It seems easy for the Allies in the first few turns... but if the Allied Commander doesn't give a "Patton push" to his forces, the German are able to counter-attack and stall the initiative or even push the Allies back in some areas.
 
Back
Top Bottom