Kennelly
Starfleet Admiral
After finishing the Second World War by conquering Iceland in November 1944 with our Panzers in "The biggest and best WWII sen' ever",I decided to try this one.
Took me ages to prepare the units in England,but in turn 1 already liberated Paris,Calais,Le Mans,Brest,Lille,Caen.In Italy Perugia,Pisa,Ancona,Ferrara,Venice.
I think there are too much rebels (aka riflemen).With them alone I freed 5 Greek cities,3 Yugoslavian and 2 Norwegian!
Is there any chance this ever gets the same improvements the WWII scenario got?
Voted for the first option again.
Took me ages to prepare the units in England,but in turn 1 already liberated Paris,Calais,Le Mans,Brest,Lille,Caen.In Italy Perugia,Pisa,Ancona,Ferrara,Venice.
I think there are too much rebels (aka riflemen).With them alone I freed 5 Greek cities,3 Yugoslavian and 2 Norwegian!
Is there any chance this ever gets the same improvements the WWII scenario got?
Voted for the first option again.
From a player's point of view, however, there are some problems in choosing 1939 as the staring point. Due to lack of initial diplomatic conditions only Germany is a reasonable choice, I agree on this. But in your scenario Germany is, imho, somewhat overpowered. It is true that the early successes were spectacular, and the military strength should reflect not only quantity but also the tactical skill of unit commanders. Despite the numerical superiority of for instance the French, it could be argued that the German army should be stronger. Nevertheless, one has to remember that von Manstein's plan, that made victory look easy, was a rather late development. Had it not been adopted things could have gone very differently. In game terms the player decides the strategy. I therefore think that a weaker Germany not only would make the scenario more challenging, but also more historically correct.
If not, is someone trying tocreate a senario with them? i suck at computers so i dare not try
