• We are currently performing site maintenance, parts of civfanatics are currently offline, but will come back online in the coming days. For more updates please see here.

Do you believe in cryptids?

Do you believe in cryptids?

  • Yes

    Votes: 29 50.9%
  • No

    Votes: 28 49.1%

  • Total voters
    57

Bigfoot3814

Deity
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
6,211
Location
Combination Pizza Hut and Taco Bell
A cryptid is any unknown animal that may or may not exist. I.E. The Loch Ness Monster, The Thunderbird, Bigfoot (;)), which also goes by Sasquatch, the Yeti, the abominable snowman, or the yowie, depending on where you live.

I for one do believe that there are animals science has yet to discover, and nothing any of you say is going to change my mind about that.
 
A cryptid is any unknown animal that may or may not exist. I.E. The Loch Ness Monster, The Thunderbird, Bigfoot (;)), which also goes by Sasquatch, the Yeti, the abominable snowman, or the yowie, depending on where you live.

I for one do believe that there are animals science has yet to discover, and nothing any of you say is going to change my mind about that.

Hmmm, I do believe in Chuck Norris, so yes :)
 
Of course there are animals that are yet undiscovered. The question is what are more likely? Some random frogs and birds in the middle of the jungle, or some giant, hairy ape wandering around North America?
 
Hmmm, I do believe in Chuck Norris, so yes :)

Chuck Norris is totally real. It's only the legend that surrounds him that still remains a mystery.
 
Chuck Norris is totally real. It's only the legend that surrounds him that still remains a mystery.

Has anyone seen Chuck Norris and still remained alive? Probably not. Have you heard of anyone that actually has seen Chuck Norris?

Man bear pig? That's from South Park LOL
 
OK. This is not a chuck norris thread. Stick to cryptids, please. :coffee:
 
Well IMO there are obviously some animals that exists that we haven't discovered. And some probably became extinct before we know it, like dinosaurs, which I do believe exists
 
Of course there are animals that are yet undiscovered. The question is what are more likely? Some random frogs and birds in the middle of the jungle, or some giant, hairy ape wandering around North America?

Clearly the hairy ape.
 
Anti-Chuck Norris Fact said:
There is no theory of evolution, just a list of animals that became extinct when Chuck Norris had sex with them.

Dude thats the new version!
 
Bunyip_%281935%29.jpg


Holy King, I see you come from Australia. Whadaya think of the bunyip?

Edit: OOPS AUSTRIA! DOH! Well, respond anyway, somebody.
 
If a creature of that nature actually existed there would be firm, credible evidence of their existence by now. Bodies. Skeletons. Live specimens. You can't tell me that in the last several hundred years of humanity exploding into all the far corners of the earth that no hunter has shot one and put it on display. Or some amateur scientist captured one. Or anyone at all finding a corpse of one in the wilderness. Creatures that large living in regions occupied by man (not exactly unexplored islands we're talking about here) quite simply would have been found by now. Or at least some reliable trace of them. Not just footprints that a 5 year old can fake, or videos of questionable authenticity, or the testimonials of a few random people.

In this case absence of evidence pretty much equals evidence of absence. They're myth, nothing more.
 
Back
Top Bottom