They are categorised as National Wonders, yet in BNW they are inserted into the list of specialist buildings...
Sooooo strange, if you ask me. But i'm not surprised in the least. The Nationals are very specific in how they handle stuff in a number of loops within the code. Plenty of other gimmicks to discover for guys like me whom aren't exactly fluent in LUA tricks.
While i think about it, ((and i hope bc1 won't be upset by me asking you)) could you inspect his code for a few things?
-- The new Units Elevator ribbon stacks to the left side while taking up an area where the Unit-Actions icons were once deployed as a single column -- which i prefer a lot more than the newest method that auto-scrambles anything since the reserved space now allocates TWO icons wide boxes. If there's an easy way to fix this, just let me know please.
-- The Diplo-Corner framework has been completely redesigned to accomodate the presence of new smaller 45x45 Icons. Presently, some of these aren't validated or some others aren't even present. Refer to the picture below;
Now *THAT's* a crowded mess of a display!
Don't try this at home folks... i made drastic changes to an otherwise solid XML.
I previously offered a him a condensed
system but (had to agree with him) it is somehow complex to implement. But i kept thinking and might have since found a reasonable solution.
Return of the old "Notes" (diplo-list) Icon from where extras (specifically - every Overviews) would drop-
down in a small ribbon_stack of their own. And one more "Notes-Like Icon symbol" attached to a second stack to the left for any other "Custom" components (such as WHoward's UI stuff... 4 of which --double-red-arrows-- are on the pic above and fully functional).
Yet, there's no way to test anything unless *ALL* of them can properly link to their corresponding Popups. The incode Container prevented Economic, Religion and Trade-Route Overview instances for example. None of these are clickable or active although shown temporarily for verification.
LUA? Something i'm missing? bc1 could even share some thoughts with us. But i'd like to discuss this issue for another good reason (just for me if anything); i want the four big 80s right back where they once were. In the same order. Thus, they'll require *more* space to deploy and as a result, push everything else further to the left. My screen is 1680 wide... but there's a limit to rational expansion.
Take a peek and let me know if & when.