Essay: Deconstructing Conservatism

[attackfighter]

The primary theme of the works of Madonna is the common ground between society and art. A number of discourses concerning Sartreist existentialism exist.

“Society is elitist,” says Sontag; however, according to Scuglia , it is not so much society that is elitist, but rather the stasis, and subsequent futility, of society. But Debord’s essay on semantic theory implies that the task of the participant is social comment. The subject is contextualised into a Sartreist existentialism that includes truth as a totality.

The characteristic theme of Drucker’s model of the textual paradigm of consensus is the role of the reader as poet. It could be said that an abundance of narratives concerning not desituationism, but neodesituationism may be revealed. Reicher states that we have to choose between Sartreist existentialism and prematerialist narrative.

Therefore, Marx promotes the use of the cultural paradigm of narrative to challenge hierarchy. The primary theme of the works of Madonna is the role of the reader as writer.

However, the example of subcapitalist feminism prevalent in Madonna’s Erotica emerges again in Material Girl, although in a more modernist sense. Foucault suggests the use of Sartreist existentialism to deconstruct sexual identity.

Therefore, if semantic theory holds, we have to choose between Sartreist existentialism and Lacanist obscurity. Sartre promotes the use of the cultural paradigm of narrative to attack capitalism.

But the main theme of Finnis’s essay on the deconstructive paradigm of discourse is the difference between culture and class. Derrida uses the term ‘semantic theory’ to denote not discourse, as Lacan would have it, but subdiscourse.

Therefore, Sargeant holds that we have to choose between the cultural paradigm of narrative and the postsemioticist paradigm of expression. Debord suggests the use of semantic theory to read and modify sexual identity.

Therefore, Marx promotes the use of Sartreist existentialism to deconstruct class divisions. The premise of subtextual desituationism holds that culture is capable of deconstruction.

It could be said that the main theme of la Tournier’s critique of Sartreist existentialism is the rubicon, and eventually the stasis, of patriarchialist class. The subject is interpolated into a precapitalist discourse that includes truth as a totality.

 

[Gori the Grey]

It could be said that I know the post modern gibberish generator site too.

 

[dominatr]

TLDR, no?



Wait, hang on, i read it. Needs less passive voice and vague pronoun referencing.

 

[Antilogic]

The OP's location is quite appropriate, although I wish he had Mouthwash's avatar.

 

[Borachio]

Yeah. It's that essay generator alright. (<burp> pardon me, I've not long had my tea.)

Madonna's the singer, right? Or the footballer. Makes no odds.

And Sontag the songwriter.

edit: oh, I see, my eyes briefly lit on Material Girl.

 

[attackfighter]

i am proud to say that this is the most eloquently stimulating discourse to take place on the internet to date

 

[Borachio]

I see. What drugs have you been enjoying recently?

 

[Gori the Grey]

i am proud to say that this is the most eloquently stimulating discourse to take place on the internet to date

What? Us calling you out on cribbing from the post-modern nonsense generator? I'd think you'd be ashamed rather than proud, but chacun a son gout.

 

[Antilogic]

I'd think it's more like contemporary Afro-feminist neo-social pre-post-modernism, though, with a touch of cubist realism.

 

[downtown]

Roll Tide.

 

[KMRblue1027]

Link to video.

 

[Bootstoots]

This has to be the work of the Postmodernism Generator.

edit: To add, have meaningful-sounding-nonsense generators gotten any better since the 1990s? I'd like to see what the state of the art in gibberish is.

 

[Antilogic]

Nah, you are just doubtful of the meta-subdiscourse of Hegelian dialects applied to the Beatles' hit songs because you are stuck in a pseudo-Aristotelian paradigm.

 

[Hygro]

Nah, you are just doubtful of the meta-subdiscourse of Hegelian dialects applied to the Beatles' hit songs because you are stuck in a pseudo-Aristotelian paradigm.

Usually, we use Aristotle to oppose Kant and Plato to oppose Hegel, and use Aristotle to bolster Hegel and Plato to bolster Kant.

 

[dominatr]

If one examines capitalist materialism, one is faced with a choice: either accept neocultural construction or conclude that context is created by the masses, given that art is interchangeable with narrativity. But Bataille#s essay on social realism states that class, somewhat paradoxically, has objective value. If neocultural construction holds, we have to choose between neomaterialist capitalist theory and postdeconstructive deappropriation.

The main theme of the works of Burroughs is the rubicon of capitalist society. Therefore, the characteristic theme of von Ludwig#s[3] analysis of social realism is a predialectic paradox. Drucker[4] implies that the works of Burroughs are modernistic.

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the concept of textual sexuality. However, several theories concerning the role of the writer as reader exist. The premise of neocultural construction suggests that the task of the observer is deconstruction, but only if Bataille#s model of social realism is invalid; otherwise, class has intrinsic meaning.

If one examines neocultural construction, one is faced with a choice: either reject prematerialist construction or conclude that art is used to entrench class divisions, given that narrativity is equal to consciousness. Therefore, Foucault promotes the use of social realism to attack hierarchy. The example of neocultural construction depicted in Burroughs#s Naked Lunch is also evident in The Last Words of Dutch Schultz, although in a more mythopoetical sense.

However, the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is not, in fact, theory, but neotheory. Baudrillard suggests the use of Sartreist existentialism to analyse and modify culture.

 

[attackfighter]

i just had the most profound revelation

intellectuals have this obsession with sex, to the point where willhelm reich wrote a book about how nazism was the result of sexual repression, and a whole bunch of other people proved that hitler suffered from various sexual perversions

i assume it's feminists or similar groups who prove that random historical figures of the 19th century were repressed homosexuals

and then freudians are/were always chalking everything up to oedipus complexes and stuff

it makes me wonder: all these intellectuals expend vast amounts of mental energy fixating on sexuality and proving that other people are perverts ... does that not bring up the suspicion that they themselves are perverts? being nerds they're probably pretty sexually repressed themselves

 

[Borachio]

Your premise is mistaken, I think.

Everyone is obsessed with sex. Even those who are completely past it. Perhaps especially them.

 

[gay_Aleks]

What about people who are past sex due to health conditions?

 

[attackfighter]

well here is a challenge to willhelm reich's premise:

if nazism was the result of sexual repression then why didn't all other european countries that were as sexually repressed submit to some form of fascism as well?

the truth is that the so-called scientists and philosophers who make these claims are hacks and that true analysises of the third reich have been done by people who were not sex-obsessed perverts like willhelm reich

 

[attackfighter]

which brings up the question: if willhelm reich's book is so obviously flawed and stupid then why does it have such positive user reviews on goodreads.com? is it plausible that people have puny brains that disallow them to judge the merit of what they read or hear, rendering them vulnerable to gimcrack philosophers and pseudo-scientists?!

my god, this changes everything