Europe in 2002

[Ramsses]

Hope you can finish it!
I really look forward...

 

[Archer 007]

Events are finished.
Now just so padding and this puppy will be ready to go.

 

[Mikoyan]

So, how's it going?

 

[Archer 007]

Slowly. Ive been very busy and havent been able to work much, Maybe ill get some time later in the month.

 

[Andrew Livings]

I was going to say before: would it help your narrative to mention the EU constitution due for final presentation on June 20th? Of course the ratification process could take another year or so, so might not be truly applicable to Euro 2002.

Could also base the federalist army on the EU rapid reaction force, and there are current proposals between Belguim, France and Germany for a more integrated military force.

Just holler if you want/need any assistance with Euro politics.

 

[Archer 007]

Sure, i'd love to hear more. The title might be changed a little .
Maybe a disagree over this constitution could be the start of the scenerio.

Maybe a list of whos for and against would help.

 

[insurgent]

Who's for and against as in nations or as in leaders or...?

 

[Archer 007]

Nations, leaders, whatever!
Which ever one you think is more relevant.

 

[Nibbe]

are you going to include sweden in any way in this scenario?

 

[Archer 007]

Originally posted by Nibbe
are you going to include sweden in any way in this scenario?

Regretfully, no. It was not on the map I started out with and im too lazy to change. Or maybe i'll take some extra time to rework things

 

[Mikoyan]

There's no way i will play it if Sweden isn't in. Too many scenario-makers ignore us.

 

[animepornstar]

yes, i agree. we should be in it too.

 

[Archer 007]

Ok then. I was thinking of fixing it anyway. Now you guys inspired me

Anyone want to give a break of who should be on each side?

 

[EmuGod]

What's the story behind the scenario, if there is one that is?

 

[MHSoft]

Maybe a disagree over this constitution could be the start of the scenerio.

There isn't really any major disagreement over the constitution. It requires all members to agree to it so if there were any countries who were firmly against it then the whole thing would be a non-starter.

Maybe a good disgreement to start on would be American relations. You could start with the US wanting to invade Iraq, and some countries supported her (Britain, Spain, Italy, most Eastern Europeans) while others are against (Germany, France, Low Countries, Scandinavia). That would give a pretty interesting balance of power.

 

[Archer 007]

Good point for a perspective, MHSoft.
The story wont be too deep, however.

 

[insurgent]

Originally posted by MHSoft
Maybe a good disgreement to start on would be American relations. You could start with the US wanting to invade Iraq, and some countries supported her (Britain, Spain, Italy, most Eastern Europeans) while others are against (Germany, France, Low Countries, Scandinavia). That would give a pretty interesting balance of power.

You would need to make Denmark and Holland pro-american, as I believe they supported the liberation of Iraq, whereas Belgium, Sweden, and to a lesser degree Norway opposed it.

 

[Archer 007]

Help me do a total listing

Pro-America: UK, Spain, Italy, Denmark, Netherlands.........
Anti-America: Germany, France, Belgium, Sweden, Norway

 

[EmuGod]

Russia would also be anti-American, but they would be a separate civ if you decide to include them.

 

[Archer 007]

Yes, they are going to be separate.