Evil Atheist Thread

In addition, it's silly to assume that each religion has an equal chance of being right... I'm pretty sure you can (sadly) rule out pastafarianism, for example.

However, if you look more to the message of agnosticism beyond pastafarianism, you could say it's 100% right.
 
Atheists are surprisingly osessed with God.

While there is good reason not to believe in god, I don't undestand why some people find it so necessary to attack other peoples beliefs. If religious people justify bigotry with their god, it might be ok, but even then it isn't probably the best way. It would be better to refute their believes from their own premisses (which in many cases is possible). If somebody just believes in god, why say anything? Do you have need to argue against me, if I declare that I believe in Father Christmas?
Well, if you gain benefits from believing in Father Christmas, that's bad. I want to rid the world of narrowminded people such as Christians.
 
Yeah, and some Christians are obsessed with little boys. Atticus implied commonality to most athiests not "some".

I know, I was explaining to him as much as to you that what he says of "all" atheists is true only of some, but not of none.

You're saying then that you only act decently towards other people because you believe some deity is offering you a carrot with one hand and waving a stick with the other? So you're a sociopath possessing no morality, capable of experiencing no empathy or compassion and kept from acting out only by your obedience to a Might-Makes-Right figure? Interesting.

Actually, I think that Bast, and also I think Atticus, and a whole lot of the people who are making what seem absurd claims about the evils of atheism in this thread, are atheists themselves.

Although I will note that if someone is a sociopath and only fear of divine retribution keeps them from going on a killing spree, said fear is probably a good thing.
 
Well, if you gain benefits from believing in Father Christmas, that's bad. I want to rid the world of narrowminded people such as Christians.

Wonderful to see that you have freed yourself from narrowmindedness.
 
Originally Posted by Bill3000
In addition, it's silly to assume that each religion has an equal chance of being right... I'm pretty sure you can (sadly) rule out pastafarianism, for example.

Surely that would be to miss the entire point of the FSM.
 
True but then no tax dollars should be spent on atheist law suits to remove a cross from a city seal or a bible donated to a city government displayed in front of a city hall. I know atheism is a lack of belief in a god or afterlife but the way those guys act they seem more zealous than the christians they love to attack.
You must be joking. Theists waste millions on religious books and buildings. Religious wars in the past aren't cheap either. Think of all that money wasted due to religion.

Atheism can be dangerous. If I don't believe in some form of divine retribution for my earthly sins, what's going to prevent me from committing them if and when I know that I could get away with it?
Come on. You don't live in Heaven. You live on Earth. You live in societies that have laws. The thing that's stopping you from committing a horrible crime is to face the punishment from the society you live in. And clearly, religion doesn't stop people from doing horrible things. The Mafia is supposedly Catholic, and that doesn't stop their actions. In Christianity, you can ask for forgiveness, so you're free from your crime after you think god forgives you.
 
Atticus implied commonality to most athiests not "some".

Yes, it was of course hyperbole, I just didn't want to mention it because it would be like explaining your jokes. Also Eran guessed it right, I am atheist in the sense that I don't believe in God (but not in the stronger sense that I would deny the possibilty of god's existence).

Now little more explicitly, most atheist or agnostics are decent folk, but some, especially young ones, can be very aggressive. Many of them seem to be building sense of superiority by arguing against christians, which at least in this part of the world is very much like arguing against children against existence of Father Christmas, since converting is done mostly by Jehova's witnesses who doesn't offer very good arguments (this isn't meant as an insult, only description).

I don't think belief in god itself can be shown to be inconsistent, if you don't suppose that believer takes the Bible literally for example. Believers on the other hand might have had experiences which give basis to their beliefs, or they might choose to believe someone who has had such experiences. Those feelings aren't on the same level that eyesight or hearing: ordinary senses can trick us too, but we all share those senses. In this case atheists do not use their "inner deity-sense" to observe that there is no god, but they lack that sense (at least I do, and please if someone is going to deny this, do it on genuine feeling, not just because you can deny it).

Now as believers can't demand that other people take that feeling as convincing argument, neither can non-believers deny that that feeling is valid argument for the believer to build his/hers own worldview.

At this point some atheists stop claiming that they can show belief in god inconsistent, and start to argue about negative consequences of religion: historical atrocities (which of course are historical, and not valid therefore), and contemporary narrowmidedness. However this is not efficient way to broaden their mind. If someone has strong feeling of god, he very unlikely abandons his belief due to any arguments on the existence of god. Instead you can broaden his mind from inside of his beliefs. At least for christians it is more than possible, Jesus didn't preach for bigotry.
 
Well, if you gain benefits from believing in Father Christmas, that's bad. I want to rid the world of narrowminded people such as Christians.
Umm....OK? While you're launching your atheistic crusade, I'll be over here not caring. I think my faith is true, and it makes me happy, and if that really bothers you or makes you think that I'm narrowminded, then you're really just a rather small person.
 
Umm....OK? While you're launching your atheistic crusade, I'll be over here not caring. I think my faith is true, and it makes me happy, and if that really bothers you or makes you think that I'm narrowminded, then you're really just a rather small person.
All right, I'm not gonna try to convert you. I hope you find the truth someday.
 
Richard Dawkins and the other militant antireligious and antitheist atheists attacking religion in their own little crusade.
I think it's very telling that the worst serious claim anyone has come up with this thread is atheists "attacking" religion.

I mean, with religion we have everything from violent acts, to trying to force their beliefs on others through the laws of even western countries. And the worst atheists do is that they freely speak out that they don't like this.

"Attacking", "Crusade" - you use these words metaphorically, when for religions they can be literal.

If all theists ever did was sit around debating religion and only "attacked" by speech, and only did so with those who engaged debate with them, I doubt anyone would care. I doubt Dawkins or those other atheists would care either, in fact; there'd no longer be a need to fight back at religion.

Here's a good post about what many atheists are pissed off about: http://gretachristina.typepad.com/greta_christinas_weblog/2007/10/atheists-and-an.html . And the worst we do is "fight" back at that.

Of course, by engaging in debate on a thread that's set up to debate atheism, I'll no doubt be pigeon-holed as an evil atheist "attacking" religion. Oh no, you're being repressed.

(Yes, I know not all religious people do bad things.)
 
The problem with atheists isn't that they believe there is no god, the problem is that they think it is perfectly acceptable to waste thousands, if not millions, of dollars in tax money suing people and governments over religious symbols displayed in public.
Source? Not saying you're wrong, but would like to know exactly what we're talking about here.
 
You must be joking. Theists waste millions on religious books and buildings. Religious wars in the past aren't cheap either. Think of all that money wasted due to religion.
Sometimes when they do that it feels hypocritical: they want compassion etc etc but waste money on those things.

Come on. You don't live in Heaven. You live on Earth. You live in societies that have laws. The thing that's stopping you from committing a horrible crime is to face the punishment from the society you live in. And clearly, religion doesn't stop people from doing horrible things. The Mafia is supposedly Catholic, and that doesn't stop their actions. In Christianity, you can ask for forgiveness, so you're free from your crime after you think god forgives you.

It's not always that, but rather

"I have gained this by philosophy, that I do without being commanded what others do from the fear of law"
 
"Attacking", "Crusade" - you use these words metaphorically, when for religions they can be literal.

I don't know where you come from, and how religion is practiced there, but here christians who make other people's life nasty are minority, and it's hard to me believe that it stems out of their faith nor that it can be stopped by questioning it. Also I wasn't talking about academic or theoretical discussion of atheism, but how some atheists act in their lives. It's odd that my christian friends rarely even mention God if they aren't challenged by atheists. Friend of mine wore T-shirt with text "Jesus is ****". Once I saw Free thinkers' magazine, which had poems about being non-religious. I donät see how those stop christian bigotry, but it seems little like obsession to me.
 
I think it's very telling that the worst serious claim anyone has come up with this thread is atheists "attacking" religion.

Well, SwedishGuy's post would tend to prove you're wrong....

I mean, with religion we have everything from violent acts, to trying to force their beliefs on others through the laws of even western countries. And the worst atheists do is that they freely speak out that they don't like this.

So, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot never did any violence or force their views on other people through laws? I suggest you really read up on history before making such blanket comments... Stalin alone killed more people in his atheistic Communist crusade than were killed in all 300 years of the actual Crusades... And I can prove that the Catholic Church was acting in direct opposition to the teachings of Jesus as well, therefore trying to blame religion for all evils in the world is a straw man at best, and delusional at worst.

"Attacking", "Crusade" - you use these words metaphorically, when for religions they can be literal.

As I pointed out above, they can be literal for atheists, too, or are you going to deny what Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot and others of their ilk did, just becuase it's inconvenient to your cause?

(Yes, I know not all religious people do bad things.)

Well at least you admit to this....

What I'll say is that I don't believe out of fear... What Eran of Archadia said eariler about spiritual experiences is partially true, although in my case, they only reinforced my belief....

What brought me to God was my searching for a solution to the evils of this world, a search that, as a result of a comment I made once to a religious person (at that time I was an anti-religious theist... I could sense that someone or something was acting as a prime mover in the universe, but I saw all organized religions as institutions set up by demagogues for the mere purpose of excusing all manner of evil). Long story short, I took an honest look in the mirror and came face to face with the most evil person I know: Myself.

I saw Jesus and what he did as the way I could go from being a part of the problem to being a part of the solution, but I'll post more on that later... My lunch break's over, and I need to get back to work.
 
So, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot never did any violence or force their views on other people through laws? I suggest you really read up on history before making such blanket comments... Stalin alone killed more people in his atheistic Communist crusade
Stalin, Pol Pot and Mao killed millions because of their Communist agendas. The fact that they were atheists seems purely coincidental.
 
Back
Top Bottom