General Politics IV - Without a Home Elsewhere

I really don't care about who and her group represent, as I am here in the EU. I care even less about her political inclination...haters gonna censor or scream as much as possible to shame others into it.
Is that picture the new edgy cool response to opinions you don't care much about? It's lost on me, I haven't seen the show. But let me tell you, what you may think of me and of what I convey also have little meaning to me.
 
The leader of Collective Shout calls herself a "feminist" but is anti-abortion and anti-LGBT. She can call herself what she wants, but if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a religious right duck.
I imagine one can be a feminist from the angle of "porn objectifies (adult) women," or separately, one can be a feminist from the angle of "porn is harmful to children (including young girls)."

I don't necessarily agree with either POV, but I don't agree that subscribing to one makes them somehow lose their feminist card all of a sudden.
 
Last edited:
oh , come on . It is an Hindu temple built when Khmers were Hindu , repeatedly awarded to Cambodia in multiple international rulings . The Thai have always been close to the US right from the beginning of the Cold War , awarded by US drawn maps that advance their claims . Cambodians have French made maps . Meaning either of the sides accepting the opponent's map and thus claims is to jeopardize its claims for the hundreds of kilometres of maritime borders . Undersea natural gas reserves bigger , far bigger than a temple and 4 and half square kilometers of land .

and that's just the beginning . Thailand is an "ideal" society . Divided in half into camps that has no intention of agreeing with each other . Meaning a corrupt criminal of a politician (and like his enemies are like no better) can be driven out of power 6 times and yet return . Due to the use of proxies and stuff . Meaning the latest Prime Minister person should have guessed she was going to be taped while talking with Cambodian strongman behind the curtain , whom she calls an uncle due to support offered during the times when the other side , crystalized as the Thai Army , has the upper hand . Supposedly Hun Sen leaked that himself , but , like , ı don't know . Am utterly scared that it will come to Lord Vader to task me about reading about the Thai issues , like ı wouldn't even know where to start .

and that's not the end . There is a Canal of Cambodia . Having never seen a seriously big river , it was mind stopping to read American river patrol boats would escort French merchant ships in the Vietnamese rivers on their way to the Cambodian capital to stop them dropping supplies for the Vietcong ... This project supposedly would be an economic boon to Cambodia ; it reportedly carries great uncertainities for the Vietnamese from ecological aspects , decreases tools of pressure against Cambodia that's getting close to China , might help the Chinese open a second front in wartime . Like Vietnam is basically the only country there or whatever that might decide to fight a war with China , in contrast to American allies that might fold the moment Trump looks them in some unhappy way . But Vietnam was Hun Sen's chief and basically only supporter at times when China was behind Pol Pot's utterly nice and sociable Khmer Rouge . No war out of that happened in 2024 , so , we have Thai stuff instead in 2025 . It needs to be shown China can't support an ally , or a client or anything before something or anything happens . Greatly helped by China deeply penetrating Thai markets , too .

for any CFC member concerned , yeah , the Vietnamese have already ordered F-16s ...
 
I imagine one can be a feminist from the angle of "porn objectifies (adult) women," or separately, one can a feminist from the angle of "porn is harmful to children (including young girls)."

I don't necessarily agree with either POV, but I don't agree that subscribing to one makes them somehow lose their feminist card all of a sudden.
Perhaps, but it makes for a rather strange contradiction given the rest of what I have seen of her public views are more inline with religious right groups, which tend to be very much opposed to feminism.
 
Conor McGregor has launched a bid to become President of Ireland.

He seemingly has recognised that he won't get a nomination - a candidate needs either 10% of members of our parliament to nominate him or to get 4 of 31 local authorities to vote for him - so he has launched a petition to get a nomination.

The first is the traditional route for established parties and has generated all presidents so far. The second has been used in the past two elections and has produced outsider candidates. The established parties seem to be trying to limit the second path by having their members not support outsider candidates.


He doesn't seem to understand the limited constitutional role of the President and is appealing to anti immigrant sentiment.
I'm not sure what he hopes to achieve as a change to the nomination requirements would need a referendum.

The two confirmed candidates so far are Mairead McGuinness, Former MEP, EU Commissioner and Vice-President of the European Parliament and Catherine Connolly a current TD/MP and former deputy chair/speaker of the parliament.
The first has been nominated by a center right party (Fine Gael) in Government and the second by a coalition of smaller left wing parties (Social Democrats, Labour and other smaller parties)
Sinn Féin and centrist Fianna Fáil haven't nominated anyone so far - the first is torn between supporting Connolly as a consensus candidate of the left or proposing their own and potentially performing poorly. The second is struggling to find a popular, unifying candidate.

Sadly President Higgins can't run again.
For his second term he was returned with an increased vote and the first to be elected on the first count [single transferable vote is used] since DeValera.
 
I saw somebody post this on discord today and it made me wonder what the Americans here think about it: https://web.archive.org/web/diff/20...tps://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/

If you scroll down a bit you will see that these paragraphs have been removed:
Spoiler :

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;–And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

Section 9​


The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.

No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.

No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

Section 10​


No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
It looks like a secret set of amendments to the constitution has taken place? I haven't been able to find any news releases that these changes were voted on at least. The exact same paragraphs are also missing from https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/

I have no other reference point on this and nobody else to immediately ask, so I asked my dumb AI assistant what implications this might have, if the current administration runs with this new constitution and pretends that the deleted sections never existed. It's not pretty.

Thoughts?
 
The explanation why is probably something more banal—the Senate’s copy online remains in tact, and Congress’ web site isn’t run by the White House. I’d check back in a week and see if nothing has changed.
 
Grenada government and opposition join forces to drop oath of allegiance to King Charles

The government and opposition in the Caribbean island of Grenada have joined forces to drop the oath of allegiance to the British crown amid growing calls to remove King Charles as the country’s head of state.

A statement from the government announcing the move said that in “a commendable display of national unity” the country’s parliament had agreed bills to amend the country’s constitution.

The change will remove the words “His Majesty King Charles the Third, His Heirs and Successors” from the pledge of allegiance and replace them with “Grenada”.

In the statement, Grenada’s prime minister, Dickon Mitchell, said: “The unanimous support for this amendment demonstrates our shared commitment to national identity and constitutional progress and while we may differ on many issues, today we stand together in affirming that our allegiance belongs to Grenada and its people.”

Later, he told local media: “I don’t think anyone in their right mind will expect me – or any future prime minister of Grenada – on taking the oath of office to serve them, that I should be swearing allegiance to King Charles, his heirs and successor.”

He added: “What is it about King Charles that is superior to me, that requires me not to swear allegiance to the people of Grenada but to him?”

The prime minister added: “Sovereign countries have excellent bilateral relations. That doesn’t mean that you have to swear allegiance to the head of a state of another foreign country.”

This only happened, he pointed out, because Grenada was a former British colony and not because it was voted on by Grenadians.
 
This article was in RCP today.


It's deep politics. I'd describe it as a traditional American left attack on the Abundance agenda pushed somewhat effectively in influential circles by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson, positioning it rather effectively and imo fairly as a movement sharing similar vibes as the effective altruism movement of fraudster Sam Bankman-Fried.

Personally I don't make much of Abundance or the traditional American left. Somewhat infamously, I tend to believe the real engine of American politics today happens to be postmaterial social issues.

Consequently, I don't think either movement can be forceful enough to break Dems out of the current malaise they seem trapped in. Either side will offer better policy outcomes than the Republicans, but as neither offer a real framework to avoid the fractures of varying postmaterial perspectives grouping in one coalition, neither can muster the mass necessary to break the barriers of real elite control. That is of course directly contrary to the goal of modern populism.

Edit, for an example of what I think the problem with Stoller's side is

At first I was surprised that Thompson came so hard at BIG, and whiffed so badly. But now I understand why. What Klein, Thompson, and their associates really hate about homeowners, government regulators, environmentalists, small businesses, and unions is the same thing they hate about Lina Khan and anti-monopolists. It’s not that we stand in the way of construction, it’s that we stand in the way of capital. They are the avatars of organized money, and they can’t stand being second-guessed by democratic forces.

Stoller is largely there. There is a stream of liberalism that believes capitalism is more efficient than government, which will remain inefficient to the point of non-competitiveness, and I think you can place Abundance within that stream. Abundance looks to harness capitalism in such a way that the owners and managers save the world, and that really is pretty outta step with democratic popular opinion, which has little such faith.

The problem is that on post-material issues, the partisans with Stoller are usually similarly anti-democratic on social issues, and view themselves as morally superior good people with a duty to enlighten the masses. This dynamic, which was recently discussed in a reasonably well researched article by CWCP guy Dustin Guastella, leaves them effectively distanced from a working class less socially liberal than they are.

Neither can be an effective vehicle for populism, then.
 
Last edited:
Here is the Guastella article I mentioned for any interested.


His stuff is usually very good. Conclusions are straightforward, even obvious. But: it is what I'd expect of someone serious about building a real movement of the people, which is actually a sense I rarely get.

Usually, I get the sense that morally converting the people to what they think constitute more moral social views is actually the imperative of most contemporary leftists. Nice not to see that.
 
Most working-class voters are what we call “economic egalitarians” – they favor government interventions to level the playing field, they take inequality seriously, and they support programs that increase the economic and social power of working people. Large majorities favor raising the minimum wage, import limits to protect jobs, increasing spending on social security and Medicare, using federal power to bring down the cost of prescription drugs, expanding federal funding for public schools, making it easier to join a union, increasing infrastructure spending,
Sounds like the US middle class would be happier over here, we have all that.
 

Hamilton police constable suspended after posting content from extremist groups, following CBC investigation​

Hamilton police say they suspended Const. Renato Greco with pay after CBC shared 'disturbing' posts

Hamilton police have suspended a longtime officer while they review his social media posts, which include content re-shared from far-right groups, anti-immigrant messages and posts in support for a coup against the government.

Following a CBC visual investigation into white nationalist "active clubs" training in the Hamilton area, a reader contacted CBC Hamilton to share they had noticed a social media user with the same name as a Hamilton constable, Renato Greco, re-posting extremist content.

One post dated July 14 of this year was a share on social media site X of an account that said "you love to see it" with a picture of the group Second Sons gathering in Nova Scotia in July.

Second Sons is one of the groups the CBC investigation identified as hosting active club gatherings recently in the area.

Police spokesperson Adam Kimber told CBC on Aug. 5 the service "was not previously aware of the social media activity in question," but started an investigation once CBC Hamilton informed it.

Kimber said Hamilton police suspended Greco with pay, and "should the investigation determine that the conduct is in breach of our standards, appropriate discipline will follow."

Hamilton police also issued a news release Monday reiterating that a member of the service has been suspended after it discovered "disturbing" social media posts "first brought to the service's attention by a media outlet." It said an investigation was underway.

"The Hamilton Police Service holds all members to the highest standards of professionalism, conduct, and impartiality. Any expression of views or support for groups that promote hate or discrimination is contrary to the values of our organization and our duty to serve everyone in our community," the release said.

"Such conduct is unacceptable and does not reflect the policies, ethics, or expectations of the Hamilton Police Service," added Kimber in his email to CBC.

Officer with force since 2002​

Greco has been with the force since 2002, Kimber said. A post on The Governor General of Canada's website said he was awarded the Police Exemplary Service Medal in 2023. The HPS website refers to him as a constable in a post in 2022.

After CBC contacted police, his X account went from public to private.

CBC Hamilton reached Greco by phone and asked if he would comment on his posts and the investigation. He declined. CBC also sent a detailed message to his Facebook account but did not receive a response.

In an email, Hamilton Police Association president Jaimi Bannon told CBC Hamilton the police union is aware of the allegations and investigation against Greco and is helping him navigate the investigation process. "The association will not comment on the allegations while the matter is under investigation."

Constable posted police and military should stage a coup​

CBC Hamilton reviewed Greco's account, going back as far as 2020 until this summer. The very active account re-shared posts that included racist stereotypes about marginalized groups on July 18, one that said "diversity means white genocide" on July 14, and re-shares of posts by Jeremy MacKenzie, the founder of Diagolon, on July 10 and 18.

Greco's account also shared content related to Diagolon-offshoot Second Sons on July 14 and 18.

The RCMP has labelled Diagolon an "extremist, militia-like organization."

In one video Greco shared to Threads on May 26, MacKenzie says immigrants are deliberately coming to North America en masse in an effort to destabilize the Western world.

In June 2020, Greco posted on X saying "Hitler was democratically elected and once in power used his brown shirts and eventually his SS to eliminate all and any political opposition!! Police and military leaders need to wake up and honour the oaths they took to protect Canada and its citizens."

In December 2020, Greco posted on X saying, "The only way Canada will survive our compromised politicians is a coup by Canadian military and police."

Expert says police and military vulnerable to extremist influence

CBC shared a handful of Greco's social media posts with Kawser Ahmed, a professor in the University of Winnipeg politics department.

Ahmed led a public safety project called Extremism and Radicalization to Violence Prevention in Manitoba.

He said he was "not surprised" to see a police officer posting extremist content.

Referring to a recent case in which the RCMP arrested and charged two active military members in an alleged plot to form an anti-government militia, Ahmed said members of police and military are vulnerable to influence and recruitment by extremist groups.

He said members of the forces are appealing recruits for these groups because they're highly trained, know how to fight and have a mindset of defending the country which extremist groups can "tweak."

They're also vulnerable in the way anyone is, he said, noting economic downturns and polarizing world events such as the pandemic and wars in Ukraine and Gaza have "primed" people to turn against institutions.

Ahmed said he was "happy" to hear Hamilton police are investigating Greco's posts.

In his experience, Ahmed said, it's "super difficult" to counter radicalization in law enforcement because "nobody wants to listen to it."

The forces are very insular, he said, and "we have to convince them that there's a problem."

It's unlikely none of Greco's colleagues knew what he was posting, Ahmed added.

Constable's posts 'deeply troubling': anti-racism advocate

Lyndon George agrees there's a problem and says it's very serious.

"You can't be a cop by day and a racist by night," the director of the Hamilton Anti-Racism Resource Centre said. "That doesn't work in the diverse communities that we have. It's not one or the other. You can't be both in this instance and think that you can carry on in your work."

George described Greco's posts calling for a coup as "unbelievable" and said his reposts of extremist content and posts referencing the racist great replacement theory are "not to be taken lightly."

"This tells you that there is an individual here who doesn't see himself reflected in the community as a whole and that's deeply troubling," George said. "Community [members] would be concerned if this person showed up at their door with these retweets if you knew that … especially as the men and women of the service carry weapons."

He added that hate crimes in Hamilton have sharply risen, and having an officer who shares racist sentiments online might make one wonder if reports of hate are taken seriously.

There should be an independent, third-party investigation into Greco, George said, examining not just his social media but who, if anyone, he may have been in contact with in extremist spaces.

A "transparent and open" investigation is necessary for community members to look at the Hamilton Police Service with the "respect that it deserves," George said. "If not, there will be a cloud of suspicion across all officers who wear that uniform."
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hami...ended-social-media-extremist-groups-1.7606015
 
Indonesia: the wheel of revolution has turned

Within a week, what began as demonstrations with a semi-insurrectionary character have turned into an open revolutionary uprising which shows no sign of stopping. It is not only tearing down government buildings and police stations, but more importantly, it is shattering the mass stupor that has kept the people in chains. A revolution has begun.

Scenes of burned parliamentary buildings, government offices, and above all, police stations have flooded the media. But most striking are the countless live broadcasts from the millions of demonstrators, which truly capture the revolutionary spirit of the moment. These images call to mind the scenes of the 1998-99 revolutionary period.

The first provincial parliamentary building to be set ablaze by the people was in Makassar, the day after the police killed a 21-year-old ride-share driver, Affan Kurniawan. This was quickly followed by similar scenes in Tegal, Solo, Surakarta, Bandung, and West Nusa Tenggara. In Pekalongan, the action began as a peaceful vigil where people mourned and laid flowers for Affan Kurniawan. But it immediately turned into a conflagration, as the furious anger of the masses burst forth.

The list grows longer by the day, as more demonstrations and escalations unfold. As we write these lines, the masses have already added Brebes, Pekalongan, Cilacap and Kediri to the list – we are struggling to keep up with the rapid developments, which are the very essence of a revolution.

Hundreds of police stations have been ransacked and burnt down. The police forces, who had been heavy-handed in their treatment of the demonstrators in the first few days, are now beating a hasty retreat. When faced with the youth, they displayed their brutality with great ‘courage’. But now, as vast layers of working people have entered the scene and overwhelmed them, they are suddenly the ones cornered and chased out. In some cities they have disappeared altogether.

To quell the mass anger that has spiralled out of their control, the government promised to investigate and prosecute the officers responsible for killing Affan Kurniawan. President Prabowo staged a media spectacle by visiting his family, embracing them, and gifting them Rp200 million and a house in an effort to calm the situation. But Affan’s father said that this gift did not soothe his grief: “This money in its billions cannot replace my son.” That sentiment is shared by the people.

In the end, seven police officers were ‘punished’ with 20 days of special detainment, meaning they would not be jailed but merely held in a police station. This is the equivalent of a high school detention. This mockery of justice further enraged the people.

1756842710473.png
 
Back
Top Bottom