Darth Tribble
Friendly Neighborhood Conqueror
I believe in the Christian God, but honestly I wouldn't really care if there was a God or not.
No. It does not follow. Because of the scale involved, what we see is a time machine--further = older. Things could have happened a billion years ago, or longer, and we have no way of knowing. We can say with confidence is that when the event occurred the universe was still expanding. That is not the same as stating that it still is expanding.How do you mean, what we can see of the universe expanding doesn't follow the universe is expanding? Every galaxy we can see is moving away from out vantage point and that of other galaxies. These are our only observations. There are no observations that tell us that the expansion stopped long ago (since we have not seen it yet as you pointed out). So my question is: how can you have a competing theory based on non-observations?
And your reason for saying that is?You are infinite. The essence of your being is infinite. The nature of experience itself is infinite.
Thats a very unorthodx pov. I mean the eternal hell was invented for a reason...I believe in the Christian God, but honestly I wouldn't really care if there was a God or not.
You are infinite. The essence of your being is infinite. The nature of experience itself is infinite.
Methaphysicaly speaking its the infinite which can create not the finite. You and your experience exist and are part of that infinity.
Its the illusion of the apparent. You and others can create becouse they are part of the infinity but you cant create out of nothing. When you create you use the existing reality which appears to be finite while in essence it is infinite...Okay, can you give me one example of something infinite which can create?
Because I can think of plenty example of finite things creating other things, and 0 examples of something infinite creating something.
As I see it you have two basic options. Either wait till you die knowing nothing more about the issue or use an abstract thinking in either physical science or methaphysics to get you closer to the answer. Both would seem to me are pointing out to the existence of an infinite reality as a solution to the problem.Yeah okay but so far you still haven't convinced me that anything infinite is involved at all.
That was a joke part. But of course subjectively it has its own sigificance. Basicaly I am saying that since we lack proof on the matter from the physical science we have to theoretise with the knowledge we have.I don't see how me dying proves that anything is or isn't infinite. It just proves it's possible for me to die, which I already know.
You go first.And assume that until we've figured that the universe is definitely finite or infinite, that we just don't know and can't say, but can discuss both possibilities in hypothetical situations
You see infinity is so much more fun...Assuming that the Universe is infinite, there might be another warpus out there somewhere, who is Muslim and hates bacon
Who do you think you are such that it can be measured?I am definitely finite in size, weight, intelligence, and all other qualities I can think of.
What is the difference? If fantasy isnt real then nothing is. Besides we both know the significance of imagination for science and the general progress of mankind. What is impossible today under present conditions will be possible in the future. And that also is an infinity.Yeah but I thought we've been talking about reality all along, not hypothetical fantasy
Who do you think you are such that it can be measured?