Stormbringer
The Brick and The Rose
So, is it good? I am debating between this and the Empires at War
Global Nexus said:For those of you waiting for reviews: http://www.pcgameworld.com/reviews/gamereview.php/id/889/
There's the first one. ^_^
Duelingground said:Ah, yes, concerning SW:EAW, I'd give it a bit of a wait. I picked it up on the release date, and it's quite buggy, not to mention having an AI that may be a bit better than MoO3's, but not by much. The AI just won't build properly, and after the initial few turns, is no challenge at all.
Really not much fun to it at this point, hopefully the devs will stand by their product, and finish the job.
damoose said:As long as your video drivers support DirectX9c you should be good to go. It should be pointed out the it is very, very, very important that you have the latest video and sound drivers for your environment.
If your hardware plays CivIV then it'll play GalCiv II
Are you talking about EAW or GC2? From what I understood there are no turns in EAW...
Duelingground said:I can verify that you'll likely be able to run GC2 if you can run Civ4. Downloaded last night via Stardock Central, and it runs like a dream. I'll probably install it on my work PC this weekend.
And, dare I say it, GC2 may have cured my Civ4 addiction, albeit by replacement.
BTW, no need to rush out and purchase GalCiv2, Stardock makes all their games available for download through their website. You can choose to only purchase the downloadable version, or download, and receive the CD via mail. They even accept PayPal now, further enhancing their well deserved customer friendly rep.
I only wish more companies would follow their lead.
How big is it btw?
damoose said:If your hardware plays CivIV then it'll play GalCiv II
Stardock's been making software for digital distribution for some years now. Those of you with Object Desktop already know that we tend to update our software very often. To us, that's the whole point of digital delivery. But in the game world, it's actually considered a negative to keep releasing updates because apparently most games only release updates to fix bugs. Our updates will include bug fixes to be sure. But that's not what they're for. They're to provide new features to our software based on user feedback to reward people for buying our software. In essence, free updates ARE our copy protection. Or more to the point, we don't need copy protection because we provide (or try to) a greater incentive for people to buy the product by giving them free updates. Moreover, free updates helps keep people playing which helps word of mouth. Word of mouth is what makes or breaks PC games. So our view is that providing a stream of free updates is just good business.