nivi
Call me Ishmael
Reluctantly.
Given how good the Mossad is and how accurate Israel claims their precision strikes against terrorist leaders are, I'm actualy sort of amazed Israel didn't utilize those resources to free him.
Given how good the Mossad is and how accurate Israel claims their precision strikes against terrorist leaders are, I'm actualy sort of amazed Israel didn't utilize those resources to free him.
I guess they didn't have the appropriate access to a willing or blackmailed Palestinian for a change.Given how good the Mossad is and how accurate Israel claims their precision strikes against terrorist leaders are, I'm actualy sort of amazed Israel didn't utilize those resources to free him.
I guess they didn't have the appropriate access to a willing or blackmailed Palestinian for a change.
The only card you have left to play now is accusing him of anti-semitism. Rut-roh.
Anyway, he asked a legitimate question: if these guys being released are terrible killers of Israeli civilians, why would their government trade over 1,000 of them for one of their conscripts?
With deals like these, I'm starting to wonder where Israel got its reputation for being so committed to its self-preservation.![]()
If they aren't dangerous, why were they being held?You people somehow got the insane notion that releasing these criminals will noticeably endanger Israel
What is this even supposed to mean? My views changed to become more consistent, not less, and in doing so that means jettisoning my romanticization of the Israelis as being these heroic defenders of freedom against Arab tyranny. It means recognizing that maybe the Israelis are not infallible and that the Arabs have some legitimate grievances. It also means instituting a true pro-American policy of neutrality, full free trade, and non-intervention.OK, again: who are you and when did you hack into amadeus' account?
I am giving the benefit of the doubt to both individuals. Both are innocent until actually proven guilty in a fair trial with no torture involved, so there is no "double standard" there. That occurs by only being able to see one side of the obvious atrocities being committed by both groups, regardless of the specific individuals who are guilty of those crimes.
My position has always been that I blame both sides for the obvious atrocities which continue to occur. You obviously have no idea what "first comes into" my "mind", and you are just making stuff up about my opinions. Why don't you discuss the topic instead of me?
And most Palestinians arrested by the Israeli government are tortured, whether they actually did anything or not. Engineers and clerics in particular are some of their most favorite victims whether they are even suspected of any "terrorist" activity or not. That is a fact.
"Taking part" is very vague, especially after the "confession" was gained by torture. Does that mean he was in the vicinity when the Israeli authorities arrested every Arab nearby? Does that mean he may have known that an attack may occur and didn't notify the Israeli authorities about it? We simply don't know.
Many Palestinians in Israeli prisons are political prisoners. It is obvious that the Israeli government typically wants retribution from all Palestinians for the actual crimes of the few. They don't seem to care whether the person was directly involved or not. Merely being a suspected member of Hamas or even a trained engineer is usually sufficient reason enough.
The man was a soldier who may very well have participated in a number of atrocities himself.
You can't get any more "balanced" than to blame both sides in these matters because they both have clearly committed numerous atrocities and human rights violations.Do those sound like you have a balanced approach to those issues? You provided no evidence he commited atrocities. It's practically libel. Once more no post about the soldier's conditions for five years which i'm sure were terrific. You make the occasional post about not taking sides, but nobody reading these forums could come to any other conclusion then that you support the Palestinians over the Israelis. That's fine. Just don't pretend otherwise.
You can't get any more "balanced" than to blame both sides in these matters because they both have clearly committed numerous atrocities and human rights violations.
Once again, I never claimed Shalit committed atrocities. I stated it was possible he did so because so many Israeli soldiers have done so in the past. That is a fact and it is clearly not "libel".
I don't have to "pretend" anything because I have made my opinions in these matters quite well known. Once again, discuss the topic instead of personally attacking me.