MSGT John Drew
freight train lover
I agree that using warriors early on is not stupid. Warriors are the basic scouting units, barbarian defenders and hut-takers, and will be your Military Police early in the game. In my previous post I'm referring to the "warrior-gambit" as how the "warrior-gambit" is termed in CFC(and most civ communities I would imagine) -- conquering cities with a rush of warriors: regular or not. And I still say "warrior-gambit" in no-reload games is stupid, dumb, and suicidal.
Originally posted by FACEMAN
Using warriors early on isn't necessarily stupid or a high stakes gamble. It all comes down to the question HOW you use them.
What I did in this game, was essentially, what is also written down in a lot of strategy guides. I followed the chinese unit/settler pairs around and attacked as soon as the city was built. I never attacked a spearman with warriors, nor did I start a fight, I was not sure to win (which means+75%) when I didn't want to loose. (sometimes it happens that u need to sacrifice units)
The high art of war is to always be able to decide who fights where when and against whom.
This is the main difference between a human brain and th AI. The AI cannot "smell" a trap, that you constructed.
FACEMAN