Ok, sounds good. If I do have time to play my whole turn tonight, I will post an I got it and play. Otherwise, just play tomorrow and I will play after you.
GR8 - Phoenix Rising
- Thread starter Greebley
- Start date
I don't think I can play tonight. I will let you go first obormot
Obormot? Can you get to this soon?
ok. Sorry for the confusion.
I got it.
I got it.
Preturn: I run science at negative gold to get Longbow a little earlier.
590 AD: We get Invention and start Gunpowder
600 AD: Good News - Korea declares war on the Aztecs, then the Aztecs recruit Vikings vs Korea.
I never understand why people turn off "always build previous unit". Essentially, it means you feel the civ AI is going to pick something more intelligent than what you built last? Usually, I find whatever I built last as the better default choice than what the govnr chooses.
Hittites and Scandanavia declare peace. I think Korea may be in trouble.
Bad-Tibra riots.
650 AD: We declare war. I move our units out of their territory and cancel the ROP beforehand.
Notes:
I lined up an attack on the first city.
I didn't build a settler. I would keep the city if we get it so the spot isn't claimed. I would switch the capitol to build a settler next turn. It is running scientists right now. We can then abandon and replace. it is in a good spot.
I will post a "I am really glad the Hittites are not going for us" picture.
590 AD: We get Invention and start Gunpowder
600 AD: Good News - Korea declares war on the Aztecs, then the Aztecs recruit Vikings vs Korea.
I never understand why people turn off "always build previous unit". Essentially, it means you feel the civ AI is going to pick something more intelligent than what you built last? Usually, I find whatever I built last as the better default choice than what the govnr chooses.
Hittites and Scandanavia declare peace. I think Korea may be in trouble.
Bad-Tibra riots.
650 AD: We declare war. I move our units out of their territory and cancel the ROP beforehand.
Notes:
I lined up an attack on the first city.
I didn't build a settler. I would keep the city if we get it so the spot isn't claimed. I would switch the capitol to build a settler next turn. It is running scientists right now. We can then abandon and replace. it is in a good spot.
I will post a "I am really glad the Hittites are not going for us" picture.
ThERat
Deity
This is a good opportunity for us to claim some more land since Korea will be struggling to stay alive. How many cities do they have? Maybe we simply keep their cities, if they are bound to disappear soon.
ThERat said:
I would say not to risk, since we are agr and 2 pop is quite affordable. We'd better keep the city for claiming land then replace it by native settler. Once again, my last time to play before departure is Tuesday night, so unless you and Obormot are very quick, maybe we need a swap.
Obormot said:
So, Obormot, you got it?
Usually, 2 longbows are not a big deal. But, we have a huge amount of 4 longbows right now.
Why our Arab brother still doesn't know currency? I hope to learn mono and chivalry from them ...
BTW: It's time to renegotiate wine deals again.
Heroes said:
I Don't always use Civ Assist II. Even when I do riots are still possible however. If I forget to check then I forget to check whether it is looking at some program or F1. Actually, when you play republic then those programs are more accurate. Since I almost always play Monarchy, CAII and map stat are pretty useless for riots so I get out of the habit.
Next player can do trades if He wants. Don't always like trading through a civ to the Hittites, though that trade may be ok to do.
For the ottomans I would not trade unless we can trade maps/have navigation and they have lots of towns. Ottomans is a dangerous trade IMO, though they may now have navigation - the next player can check.
Greebley said:
You almost always play monarchy? Habit of AW?
Anyway I think MapStat is very good for happiness and flip monitor, it will pop out if some city is in danger.Trade with Hittites should be fine, because the route was ok even when Hittites was fighting every other civ!
Northern Pike
Deity
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2003
- Messages
- 6,673
After we take Sariwon and maybe Suwon, we can see what city improvements survive in them, and factor that information into our decision on whether to replace them or not.
With Aztec cav pushing into Korea far faster than our plodding SoD, I don't think we're likely to take many cities in this war. That's an argument for keeping the ones we do take.
It's a minor thing, but I'd change Kisurra's barracks build to a library. At 2 spt we're never going to build many units there.
With Aztec cav pushing into Korea far faster than our plodding SoD, I don't think we're likely to take many cities in this war. That's an argument for keeping the ones we do take.
It's a minor thing, but I'd change Kisurra's barracks build to a library. At 2 spt we're never going to build many units there.
Northern Pike said:
Agree, we don't need more rax. Those cities without rax will be happy to produce trebuchets.
Maybe cavalries will raze some cities of Korea. We should prepare some settlers for that. Well, we are in short of attacker, artillery, city, settler, production, ... everything.
I was building barracks because I would rather have our main towns building Longbows and we need more Enkidu. Another Enkidu builder seemed worth while.
I think we need Enkidu much more than Trebs at the moment. Not that we can really afford them, but hey, thats life.
I think we need Enkidu much more than Trebs at the moment. Not that we can really afford them, but hey, thats life.
It doesn't have to remain at 2 spt. It is one of our lowest corruption town and should have more squares if we are going to keep it.
The other alternative is to put it on wokers and disband it. Once we have more space, we probably won't want a city that close to the capitol. Raising the rank of every city for 2 or even 5 spt is a waste. I probably do like that idea better than the rax.
The other alternative is to put it on wokers and disband it. Once we have more space, we probably won't want a city that close to the capitol. Raising the rank of every city for 2 or even 5 spt is a waste. I probably do like that idea better than the rax.
Similar threads
