Greenpeace is being [FILL IN SYNONYM FOR ALARMIST AND ARMAGEDDONIST HERE]

CivGeneral said:
Greenpeace is just a bunch of treehuggin' liberal nutjobs ;).
Your attitude is not cute whether directed at gays, atheists or environmentalists. Just thought you should know.
 
Narz said:
Your attitude is not cute whether directed at gays, atheists or environmentalists. Just thought you should know.
Well, I dont aprove of Greenpeace's protest actions which are impacting on progress. All I see them doing is just doing illegal acts of civil disorder.

I can also tell that you have not noticed nor believe that I have changed my attitude towards homosexuals and atheists :-/.
 
Just to say that the original founder of Greenpeace, the one who resigned (or he was sacked, I don't know) is a nice guy. His truly concern was environment while knowing people's needs, but seems that the organization took a different route with the new, more radical, leaders.
 
CivGeneral said:
Well, I dont aprove of Greenpeace's protest actions which are impacting on progress. All I see them doing is just doing illegal acts of civil disorder.

I can also tell that you have not noticed nor believe that I have changed my attitude towards homosexuals and atheists :-/.
I believe you have somewhat. Maybe your attitude towards Greenpeace should be next. You can still disagree with their policies without calling them "treehuggin' liberal nutjobs". I don't agree with everything they do either, in fact in some cases (like PETA) I believe they hurt their cause more than they help but at least they're trying to make a difference, even if musguided.
 
I thought I heard a while ago that Greenpeace had started favouring nuclear power via the "lesser of two evils" argument.

PS for all the people afraid of nuclear powerplants, A person recieves a higher dose by eating a banana or having sex than if they were to live near a nuclear powerplant their entire life. An NEW (nuclear energy worker) is a thousand times more likely to die whilst driving to work, than they are while they are at work.

Yes, I said banana.

The only thing even remotely relating to scientific that Greenpeace has ever used against nuclear power is pirate data.

Exhibit A:
pirates.png


I'm going to end my rant there, because otherwise I'll end up making an annoyingly long post.
 
Xshayathiya said:
I thought I heard a while ago that Greenpeace had started favouring nuclear power via the "lesser of two evils" argument.

Maybe you heard that one of the founders, Patrick Moore, the one who resigned long time ago, wrote an article in The washington Post, saying that nuclear power was a good alternative.

Patrick Moore being sensible



pirates.png


That graph is WRONG.... almost 2 celsius degrees of increment in so few years, I see something wrong with your data collection. Nobody gives such a big increment. :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom