Guess the map

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe the number of ways to define a communist as bad.... But then Canada is way to far out.
 
Hmm. OK, so:

It's something likely to be a percentage figure.

It is something for which data couldn't be found for a lot of smaller, poorer states, which would suggest a complicated or difficult to measure phenomenon.

It's above 80 for Canada, the USA, the Netherlands, Hungary, the UK and Australia, but notably New Zealand, South Africa and a bunch of European are the only ones in the second top category.

The map doesn't really correlate with economic development - Spain, Portugal, Israel, South Korea, and Japan are notably below 60. China and the Andean states are 0-20, below a 20-40 group formed of African states, Russia, the Balkans, and much of the middle east.

Maybe it's got something to with car dependency? Percentage of households with a landline phone?

I'm stumped.
 
Here's the map again:
Guess the Map!

Spoiler What could this be..? :
fx8nkj.png

He said it had to do with communism.

t's above 80 for Canada, the USA, the Netherlands, Hungary, the UK and Australia, but notably New Zealand, South Africa and a bunch of European are the only ones in the second top category.

This gives the impression that English is involved.

Is it how democratic the government is?

I am likewise stumped. Please disclose the answer.
 
This might give the game away, but its related to people's attitudes primarily, and the english language and communism in a more indirect sense.
 
Ah! Percentage of Americans who view the country positively.
 
You're missing Finland in the Eurozone. Also doesn't Andorra use euroes unofficially? And Kosovo but it's not even shown on the map.

You're missing Finland in the Eurozone. Also doesn't Andorra use euroes unofficially? And Kosovo but it's not even shown on the map.

I did miss out Finland.

But I erased Kosovo off the map. I don't recognise it as a nation until the UN recognises it. In today's context, when it comes to what makes a sovereign country, I draw the line at a country with UN membership or observer status.

Which is why Taiwan isn't specified away from PR China.

That said, I need to erase of Palestine off my maps.

But of course, I recognise that they are de facto, self-governing states with their own armies and people and land. They just aren't in my book, de-jure countries.
 
So, presumably, any map you create that pre-dates 1945 is just a grey wasteland, then? :rolleyes:
 
Or intentionally provocative.
 
% of people that likes Silent Night Deadly Night part 2?

% of people that the CoS claims to have converted?
 
...Fair point. Still, it seems a bit arbitrary, doesn't it? I mean, combining the RoC with the PRC is simply counter-intuitive.

What constitution a nation is rather arbitrary anyway. I just made my arbitrariness more selective that's all.

He simply recognizes the fact that Taiwan has been an inalienable province of the glorious People's Republic of China since time immemorial.

I simply recognise that the People Republic of China is the legitimate government of China and that Taiwan is part of China (as compared to part of People's Republic of China)

I'll be glad to recognise it as a de jure sovereign nation once the UN does.
 
What constitution a nation is rather arbitrary anyway. I just made my arbitrariness more selective that's all.
The delineation of a nation-state may be somewhat arbitrary (that really depends on circumstance!), but that doesn't mean that recognising the effective governing body of a territory is. Or would you have us believe that the Plantagenets really were the Kings of France? :p

I simply recognise that the People Republic of China is the legitimate government of China and that Taiwan is part of China (as compared to part of People's Republic of China)

I'll be glad to recognise it as a de jure sovereign nation once the UN does.
Why lend such authority to one institution, when you deny it to others? :huh:
 
Because there is no organization really comparable to the UN.
And for Taiwan, there are only 23 countries, the most significant being probably the Vatican or Dominican Republic recognizing it as independent.

The delineation of a nation-state may be somewhat arbitrary (that really depends on circumstance!), but that doesn't mean that recognising the effective governing body of a territory is. Or would you have us believe that the Plantagenets really were the Kings of France?
So you recognize the independence of South Ossetia?
 
Or would you have us believe that the Plantagenets really were the Kings of France? :p
It is said that Geoffrey of Anjou (father-in-law to Eleanor of Acquitaine) controlled more land than the King of France.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom