I don't know what the current staff's position on this idea would be, but when I was on board and Conquests came out, we talked about it briefly and decided against it. One, there wasn't anyone willing to set it up. Two, there seemed too little demand for it. Three, Conquest Scenario games mean everyone's playing the same map basically. It's more like GOTM than HOF.How about I say i AM a hot girl.. if it would help in the creation of a leaderboard for Conquest Scenario games!![]()
The points you make are valid. In particular in the rare event that the game crashes there is no alternative. However it is important to add that players should replicate their moves and not take advantage of 'new' information gained before the crash. In the event of multiple crashes it is worth sending an e-mail to us (hof.civfanatics@gmail.com) so that we are aware of the issue when reviewing the game data.Isn't it immaterial whether you started from an autosave or from a .sav of your own creation so long as you did not "reload a save to try and change game events..."? Theoretically, you could intentionally start each new game-in-progress session from an autosave file.
The problem is if you re-load a .sav more than once (whether an autosave or not). In the event of a crash, that might be necessary depending on the circumstances. Otherwise, the mere fact that you started from an autosave is not prohibited and probably doesn't even require an explanation unless you reloaded it more than once.
Just a question relating to a CIV on a boat, I am currently playing a huge demi milk and was hoping to destroy the AZTECs and took their last city out, however they were not destroyed. Is it likely that under these circumstances the game will crash.