Gelion
Retired Captain
Rambuchan thank you for recognising my point and I did read your discussion with Cuivienen. Are you going to adress my post?
. I'm sorry if you did in your last post, but I assume you did not....

Was this the answer you are looking for? I did include this in my last post:Gelion said:Rambuchan thank you for recognising my point and I did read your discussion with Cuivienen. Are you going to adress my post?. I'm sorry if you did in your last post, but I assume you did not....
If I've addressed you ok then we can continue and discuss what blurred morals mean both for children and society as a whole. Then we'll see if HP is doing us a favour or not.Ram said:Ever thought how we see blurred moral lines in cultural output more these days? As in the current Batman Begins? Or in Sin City? Ever considered how notions of personal morality, which overides institutional morality, is on the rise? Let's widen it a bit please and not turn into an HP fanclub thread.
And I call this a triumph of marketing over content. Is that how you see it?Gelion said:My concern is with popularity of this book in the news and among the readers thats why I think HP stands out.
Sorry what thing isn't getting proper attention?Gelion said:Not exactlyThe content is there, but I do not think this thing is getting proper attention and its not to do with marketting or sales.
Ram said:Ah! Yes I understand what you mean better now. Why don't you say it in the thread for all those HP fans to read? I'm sure it will inspire some good debate. Thanks for the PM.
Gelion said:I think the media is making a great deal of this HP book and considering what I've read in it I think its a propaganda book for the "new" set of morals I do not like. Hope that explains it![]()
That's pretty controversial man. I might have to go get some popcornGelion said:I think the media is making a great deal of this HP book and considering what I've read in it I think its a propaganda book for the "new" set of morals I do not like. Hope that explains it
nonconformist said:The Harry Potter world is BS. Not the magic. But the charachters are purer than snow. They aren't sexually, morally, or mentally impure. They aren't completely immature gits.
nonconformist said:They go around, sneaking into forbidden areas, and do dangerous stuff? Now excuse me, but if I didn't have a really good excuse, and a clean record, I'd have been expelled by now.
nonconformist said:Then you hugely inflate the prices of the books, so I could probably buy DVDs, computer games, and who know's what else for the same price (I could have a good weekend for that sort of cash!).
The books are expensive. They don't even release them in paperback.
nonconformist said:Then you get to all the spinoff merchandise.
"Harry Potter PC game". "Harry Potter Lego set". "Harry Potter Barry Bumpkin Magical Broad Bean Sweets". "Harry Potter underwear set" "Harry Potter carrot" "Harry Potter jackboots and armband".
Nope. Blowing up cans of deoderant, torturing teachers, having apple fights and mbeating each other up is immmature.Bluemofia said:These 2 sections contradict each other. IMHO, being reckless is immature.
Okay, they eventually come out im paperback.No, I got #6 for 14 bucks, and yes, they do come out in paperback.
![]()
Correct me if I am wrong, these books look like they are in paperback.
It's a sad by-product of our society, but they only milk the cash cow for some popular things, which attract the most gullible members of our society (i.e 8-17 year olds). They haven't done it for, say, mtotr vehicles, music, or adult lirterature, as far as I can tell.Don't they do this with everything popular?
In a particularly distasteful and lewd display, Potter tries to tempt the rightfully furious Angel [Lucius Malfoy] by raising his pant leg and showing him his nude ankle. In this way the Harry Potter books contribute to the hidden gay agenda. When this temptation is refused, he has a malignant house spirit who embodies all the evils of stem-cell research curse the angel down.
nonconformist said:Nope. Blowing up cans of deoderant, torturing teachers, having apple fights and mbeating each other up is immmature.
nonconformist said:Okay, they eventually come out im paperback.
nonconformist said:It's a sad by-product of our society, but they only milk the cash cow for some popular things, which attract the most gullible members of our society (i.e 8-17 year olds). They haven't done it for, say, mtotr vehicles, music, or adult lirterature, as far as I can tell.
nonconformist said:Okay, they eventually come out im paperback.
Cuivienen said:All books (of significance) do this - they come out in hardcover first, then in paperback a few months later (for HP6, I believe the paperback release is in October). The real reason is that people who care enough to buy the book shortly after the release date will probably want a lasting version anyway and won't care that it's more expensive.
*eats words*MSTK said:If anyone says that Snape is a "bad guy", they are 98% logically incorrect.
Snape may be the antagonist in some ocassions, but through and through he's shown himself to be a trustworthy person.
nonconformist said:Nope. Blowing up cans of deoderant, torturing teachers, having apple fights and mbeating each other up is immmature.
Nobody said:where is it repetetive, it does always start off with him sad at home but then he leaves on some adventure, and then at the end he confrences with dumbledor, but these parts are like the way you do the same (ish) thing every christmas. The storys are always fresh, who could see that sirius was going to die, and who had any idea what a goblet of fire and the a order of the phenoix were?
Cuivienen said:Spoiler Book 6 Details :I have to agree with MattBrown. You don't kill Dumbledore and stay trustworthy...