Well, our influence on climate is miniscule. Our influence on climate change is something else.
Not according to anyone who has studied it.
You need to wake up, and pay attention to the news. Have you not heard of Climategate?
Ah, Pseudo sceptics. Dismissing mountains of evidence, while drawing conclusions from 3 sentences in 3000 emails.You need to wake up, and pay attention to the news. Have you not heard of Climategate?
The 1,073 e-mails examined by the AP show that scientists harbored private doubts, however slight and fleeting, even as they told the world they were certain about climate change. However, the exchanges don't undercut the vast body of evidence showing the world is warming because of man-made greenhouse gas emissions.
Seen it too. It's great.Ah, Pseudo sceptics. Dismissing mountains of evidence, while drawing conclusions from 3 sentences in 3000 emails.
I heard of Climate Gate. I was worried about Climate Gate. I'd have been quite mad if what the blogs reported was true.
And then it was put into perspective by this article, courtesy of El Machineaux for bringing it to my attention.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...ME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2009-12-12-14-31-45
You need to wake up, and pay attention to the news. Have you not heard of Climategate?
That proves that scientists are human. Not that they've made things up.
Hate to break it to you but humans do indeed sometimes make stuff up for a wide variety of reasons.
That's a compltely irrelevant response to what he said (as well you know)
Hate to break it to you but humans do indeed sometimes make stuff up for a wide variety of reasons.
No, its not irrelevant to his comment about them being human. Human error, and their ability make stuff up (lie) are well known. Climate scientists arent immune to doing that since they are indeed human.
So, the ad hominem here is that 'they're human'?
So you think scientists made up AGW? Didn't know you were a conspiracy theorist.
Yes, They are wrong because they are human.
About as accurate as believing they are correct because they are human.
Which, again, as is typical,is simply changing the subject rather than addressing the points. No one in the world believes or argues that. So why bring it up at all except to obscure the issues?
Which, again, as is typical,is simply changing the subject rather than addressing the points. No one in the world believes or argues that. So why bring it up at all except to obscure the issues?
Look, your're the one whos defense of climate-gate was 'it shows their human'. Not me.