GodsPetMonkey
Holy Simian!
Whether the head of the royal family is the head of state or not doesnt really matter. Think about it, does the Queen have any power? None, absolutely none.
Now, I cant speak for the British, but here in Australia, the only purpose she serves is to have her head carved on the back of our coins (one less decision to worry about). Effectively, our head of state is our Governor General (really the Queens representative) who is selected by the Prime Minister anyway. Its a good system, if we were to become a 'republic' I should doubt it would change, rather then a Governor General we would have a President, same system, makes sense doesnt it. All the Governor General does is sign the paper of what ever is passed by parliament anyway (as the Queen's Representative), so he doesnt hold any real power.
Actually, I tell I lie, he does hold a power, the power to sack the ruling government, pretty nifty, only ever used once though.
I should imagine that the British would keep the same political system that is has now if they removed the Queen, the head of state would just be selected by parliament. Only problem is what do you put on the coins?
Actually, now that I think about it, what does a head of state do? Really, I dont think Australia would notice if we didnt have one, one less formality to worry about.
I think the reason why this Queen vs Republic thing keeps on popping up is because someone is confusing her with someone who has power. Probably Americans, they give to much power to their head of state. You deserve Bush, its your own fault the system is broken.
I doubt Australia will get rid of the Queen soon though, and not because we cant decide on what to replace here with, but rather because we would hate to lose a public holiday. Long live the Queen, because I love it how I dont have to work when its her birthday!
GodsPetMonkey - Not caring who is the head of state, as long as he/she gives me a holiday.
Now, I cant speak for the British, but here in Australia, the only purpose she serves is to have her head carved on the back of our coins (one less decision to worry about). Effectively, our head of state is our Governor General (really the Queens representative) who is selected by the Prime Minister anyway. Its a good system, if we were to become a 'republic' I should doubt it would change, rather then a Governor General we would have a President, same system, makes sense doesnt it. All the Governor General does is sign the paper of what ever is passed by parliament anyway (as the Queen's Representative), so he doesnt hold any real power.
Actually, I tell I lie, he does hold a power, the power to sack the ruling government, pretty nifty, only ever used once though.
I should imagine that the British would keep the same political system that is has now if they removed the Queen, the head of state would just be selected by parliament. Only problem is what do you put on the coins?
Actually, now that I think about it, what does a head of state do? Really, I dont think Australia would notice if we didnt have one, one less formality to worry about.
I think the reason why this Queen vs Republic thing keeps on popping up is because someone is confusing her with someone who has power. Probably Americans, they give to much power to their head of state. You deserve Bush, its your own fault the system is broken.
I doubt Australia will get rid of the Queen soon though, and not because we cant decide on what to replace here with, but rather because we would hate to lose a public holiday. Long live the Queen, because I love it how I dont have to work when its her birthday!
GodsPetMonkey - Not caring who is the head of state, as long as he/she gives me a holiday.