How many Operating systems do you use at home?

I thought aimeeandbeatles was talking about macs. :confused: Anyways, the Windows 7 downloads folder isn't hidden for me (might have been in Vista), and documents being hidden doesn't matter because of the documents library (or virtual folder, as it was called in the longhorn days before being cut from Vista).
She was talking about Macs, then I talked about the hidden USB files
I mean it put new folders on the USB. I didnt even see those until I opened it up on my home computer. They were hided.

Oh, you mean the ".DS_Store" folder. That folder stores your display related preferences such as the screen position of the Finder window where you last left it, and it also stores Spotlight indexing data.
 
She was talking about Macs, then I talked about the hidden USB files


Oh, you mean the ".DS_Store" folder. That folder stores your display related preferences such as the screen position of the Finder window where you last left it, and it also stores Spotlight indexing data.

Yeah. I dont like things left on my USB other than what I put on there myself. I often delete the System Volume Information folder but it keeps coming back.
 
currently,

windows 7,
OSX
Fedora 14
Ubuntu 10.4
PC linux
Server 2008R2
Win Vista (booo)
and my own custom version of Fedora.
And ESX too
 
On PCs:
Win XP
Win Vista
Win7
Ubuntu (various)

Servers:
Win2003
Win2008
various VMs

... I think that's it, but I haven't rebuilt my rack lately because I'm focusing on a degree program instead of certifications at the moment.
 
The only operating system I regularly use at home (not for academic-releated stuff) is Windows XP. The only thing it doesn't do for me is test compatibility of applications with other operating systems, and it's by definition that it doesn't do that. Otherwise, it runs all my existing software (which non-Windows OS'es don't), runs them all well and without glitches (which Vista and 7 don't for all programs), and cooperates well with all my hardware (better than Vista, which my laptop was supposedly but probably not really designed for, and a bit better than 7).

I do have Windows Server 2008 R2, basically Windows 7 minus a bunch of the consumer features and plus a bunch of server features I don't use, installed on a second partition, but I rarely boot it up. The original purpose was to use the Russian Multilingual User Interface to improve my Russian skills, but I never did use it that much as it was more convenient to use XP where all my programs worked and were installed, and I no longer study Russian. I've considered deleting it several times, but it's survived so far. But if I do run low on space, it's in danger.

I also have a few virtual machines installed. The only ones I use with any frequency are PCLinuxOS MiniMe 2009 (despite its zero support/updates), mainly for Linux compatibility checking and seeing if there's any neat Linux software, and Windows 3.11/DOS. The latter is purely for anachronism's sake - I have one Windows 3.11 virtual box that supports high resolutions or lots of colors, and another that supports Internet browsing with IE5, Netscape 4, and Opera 3, as well as MP3 playback. My other virtual machines are, like Server 2008 R2 (Windows 7) in danger of deletion if space becomes an issue.

Technically I also use Solaris 9 at home, but it's for academic-related stuff, not because I actively choose to use Solaris 9. Most of the time I use it without a GUI, but occasionally I use GNOME 2.02 (a bit outdated, but I can't update it), and I formerly used the CDE with it, where the flagship Netscape 4.78 browser was available.

I agree with Genocidic Bunny on Apple/OSX - I've no desire to overpay for Apple hardware just to run their OS when it's the same hardware that any other company uses, and am not a fan of the company on principle reasons. Neither do I see any reason to replace my existing hardware that's working quite well, or acquire more physical hardware. But if it were easy and legal to run it on commodity hardware, it would be convenient to do so for compatibility testing.

Heres an interesting site of GUIs
http://toastytech.com/guis/index.html

That's a neat site. Don't remember how I first came across it, but I wouldn't have known how to get back there. Bookmarked now.

And then it kept a bunch of strange folders on my USB and some files I couldnt delete (it would error) but I got rid of those.

That annoyed me back when I occasionally had to copy files off my school's OS 9.2 Macs via floppy disks or flash drives. The Volume Settings Folder still exists on some of those disks.

Downsides - there's like 8 different versions, cost me $99, Comes with I.E. 8 which is still crap, more likely to get malware

You can actually uninstall IE in Windows 7 now, such that I'm pretty sure it won't start no matter what (as opposed to just being able to remove shortcuts but not the program in XP/Vista). And since you're free to install whatever browser you like, there's no reason to have IE on Windows 7 if you don't like IE.
 
When I was experimenting, I used to have:
-Ubuntu;
-Windows 7;
-Arch Linux;
-Debian Squeeze;
-Gentoo;
-Slackware.

Now I've settled down and only have Debian Squeeze.
 
In summary, I only use 2 OSes as both my desktop and laptop dual boot with Windows 7 and Ubuntu.

At a push, however, I have Symbian S60 5th Edition running on my Nokia mobile and iOS 3.11 running on my iPod Touch 2nd gen. That makes 4 I guess.

Also, if you want to include virtual machines, I've got Win 95 (for reliving the old days), Windows XP and Ubuntu sitting in VMWare...
 
XP 32 bit....boots in 21 sec on one system I built

XP 64 pro on this system....tried Win 7 64 pro....sucked so bad and crashed so much, I wiped the drive and put XP 64 pro on it and never looked back
Boots in 24 sec with the antivirus etc all tickety boo and ready to go

now just trying to figure out if Civ 3, 4, and 5 will run on it
every other program I've thrown at it has run just dandy
if anyone has a link etc and can toss me a bone so I can know if any of these 3 will run on XP 64 pro, please let me know
 
I have 3, Win7 on my desktop, Win vista on the laptop, and win vista on a computer in storage. I have disks for XP 32 and 64 bit but no computer for them

XP 64 pro on this system....tried Win 7 64 pro....sucked so bad and crashed so much, I wiped the drive and put XP 64 pro on it and never looked back
Boots in 24 sec with the antivirus etc all tickety boo and ready to go

I would say your problem wasn't win7, as I have win7 64 pro and haven't had any crashes.
 
well that was the only change I made.......went from Win 7 64 pro back to Win XP 64 pro
I fought with it for 3 weeks and finally blew a gasket and went backwards and haven't had a problem (knock on wood) the past 8 months

Win 7 64 pro crashed on at least 7 of the programs. the problem wasn't hardware
the problem was the 32 bit emulator, imo
 
well that was the only change I made.......went from Win 7 64 pro back to Win XP 64 pro
I fought with it for 3 weeks and finally blew a gasket and went backwards and haven't had a problem (knock on wood) the past 8 months

Win 7 64 pro crashed on at least 7 of the programs. the problem wasn't hardware
the problem was the 32 bit emulator, imo

Was that a 3rd party emulator by any chance?
 
well that was the only change I made.......went from Win 7 64 pro back to Win XP 64 pro
I fought with it for 3 weeks and finally blew a gasket and went backwards and haven't had a problem (knock on wood) the past 8 months

Win 7 64 pro crashed on at least 7 of the programs. the problem wasn't hardware
the problem was the 32 bit emulator, imo

You sure? It sounds like your system is just plain too old for Windows 7.
 
1 busted computer running xp, one almost busted computer running xp (its almost too slow to be usable), one busted computer running vista (laptop that had a blanket fall on it), one working (due to being recently refurbished) computer running vista, one perfectly working laptop running windows 7.

Edit: forgot, there is also 1 desktop running 98 but it doesn't work anymore.
 
Back
Top Bottom