How SUVs are the problem

Sobieski: The last paragraph of my post is my way of saying that I agree with you. There are two factors to the price of oil that are not being captured - that it's in limited total supply and that burning it causes pollution. The first factor is somewhat captured by our supply hiccups (so even though we have oil, we're starting to look at alternatives), the second can only be captured through political will.
 
Administration rolls out gas economy rules

Largest SUVs will no longer avoid standards

The Bush administration issued new rules Wednesday ratcheting up gas mileage requirements for pickup trucks, sport utility vehicles and vans.

For the first time, the rules cover the largest SUVs on the road, such as General Motors' Suburbans, Tahoes and Yukons made at the company's assembly plant in Janesville.

Automakers will have to average 24 miles per gallon by 2011 models of SUVs, pickup trucks and minivans, the Transportation Department said. The current standard is 21.6 mpg.

Outlined amid growing public concern about U.S. dependence on foreign sources of oil and rising pump prices, the new rules represent the most significant changes to the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards in three decades.

The new rules, covering 2008 through 2011, could save 10.7 billion gallons of fuel over the lifetime of the vehicles sold during the period and go further than an administration proposal issued last summer.

"The new standards represent the most ambitious fuel economy goals for light trucks ever developed in the program's 27-year history," said Transportation Secretary Norman Y. Mineta.

The new rules do not apply to passenger cars, which must meet a 27.5 mile per gallon average fuel economy. They include SUVs weighing 8,500 to 10,000 pounds for the first time starting in 2011 but would not include large pickup trucks in the weight class because they are used primarily for work, Mineta said.

The article goes on to mention that the automakers plan to meet the new standards by the "use of lighter materials, a better transmission and more use of diesel engines. Shaving pounds doesn't necessarily mean the vehicles have to be smaller."
 
Now we just have to convince people to only get Pickup Trucks if they intend to use them for work!

About time for this legislation. Normally, I'd want moral suasion to fix a problem, but it's hard to get people to sacrifice if they don't see other people sacrificing.
 
El_Machinae said:
Sobieski: The last paragraph of my post is my way of saying that I agree with you.

El_Machinae said:
The problem with acting with group benefits in mind (for me, owning a small car) is that I subsidize the SUV. I help keep fuel cheaper by limiting demand and I provide weaker competition if I get into an accident. I see no way around it. I'd imagine that you pay quite a bit more for insurance than I do though, since your vehicle is likely to do more damage.

Yes, I see it now. Good to see at least some of my fellow canucks are on the same page. :goodjob:
 
Back
Top Bottom