amadeus
it’s too hot here to think
This is where my beef comes in—how is a neutral mediator going to concede that Russia has a sphere of influence without breaking that neutrality?
If this neutral mediator’s responsibility is to uphold the precedent of international law, codified or not, then I don’t see anything other than a complete withdrawal of Russian forces from the 1991 borders of Ukraine to be a valid expression of that neutrality.
If this neutral mediator’s responsibility is to uphold the precedent of international law, codified or not, then I don’t see anything other than a complete withdrawal of Russian forces from the 1991 borders of Ukraine to be a valid expression of that neutrality.