I'm not fighting anything, as I express many times, I'm frustrated with post like yours and zonks, and the innuendo and ad homenims on the producer.
And really your positions are all so extreme that even when people like myself who have expressed alot reservations, posted/confirmed numerous bugs on the appropriate forums, try to repond, It's easy to drop them and argue all day about things you liked in civ4 that didn't get carried over to Civ5. Because that's inevitably the trajecty of the discussion. Looking backwards.
Essentially reasonable opinions are eliminated through this cycle of radicalization from the fringe ragers. Every thread devolves into thromdr/zonk/et. al tag team of complaining.
It's tiring, and I've tried to avoid as much of it as possible and respond to only what is pertinent. And I'm not sure why you want to derail this thread agian after Zonk did, to make personal attacks on people who disagree.
My position is qutie clear. civ5 is a fine product, the ideas are there and quite good. They just need to fix it. The expanions and 'complexities' will come later, but they need to fix the vanilla game first.