If you get a PhD, you frequently run into the ol' "overqualified" obstacle (i.e. you don't get the job).
Plumbers make good money because they are ALWAYS needed.
So there you have it: give up your academic daydream and get real by becoming a plumber!
Don't let the promise of cushy office job fool you, it seems like just anybody has a BA these days, so you'll face just plenty of competition--especially given the *ucked up nature of the present international market economy. Soon you'll need a bloody BA just get a plumbing permit!
And if you're looking for a position in academic circles, forget it. Each old Prof. that retires or dies off doesn't get replaced, the course is closed--except for certain technical fields. Universities are becoming more like technical training colleges every day.
About the BSc being better than a BA:
I'll give you a simple formula that will clear things up for you: science cannot exist without knowledge, knowledge requires imagination, imagination requires insperation, art provides insperation without any (or little) prior knowledge.
This society is in a state of social stagnation precisely because there are more BScs than BAs (political science doesn't count because it really should be a science). Technological development means nothing if the capacity to innovate isn't there (i.e. innovation requires creativity and that rises from arts, not sciences--in the past, the two have been meshed together whereas now they are completely seperate); it is not progress because its purpose is not to enlighten humanity but rather to research for its own sake. If it were otherwise, society would not be disfunctional as it is now (that term refers to the fact that society does not serve its primary purpose which is the maxization of benefits to all people who participate in it). Of course, the arts have tried to adapt by making themselves more applicable to the day-to-day and have only degraded their position in doing so.