I've just convinced myself to that 9/11 is a conspiracy

[Ondskan]

How about you?


A long time has past, there's a bunch of polls here and there but sadly it's mostly on websites that a certain bunch of people.
It seems to me that there's a wide range of people here so I'll make the poll here and in some other similar places later.


Basicly what I think was done is that Terrorists flew the planes into the building but that those planes couldn't possibly take down the building.
After watching countless of videos and reading what scientists and architects from both "sides" have said I must say that I agree with those who say that explosives were placed.

The videos clearly show a systematic (homogen in Swedish, I don't know the english word) and rapid destruction of the building in nearly free fall speed.
Something according to the side I support is impossible according to the laws of physics (in their and my oppinion!!) if not explosives are used.


What do you think? Please also include a small reason to why you think so.

Disclaimer: Results of the polls may be published. Not as representative results but as an addition to all other polls out there. Please take this seriously as you can because it is a serious issue. If you find any of the arguments completely ridicilous do explain why.

EDIT: I know that this has been discussed before, but I don't really want it discussed. Just hear peoples oppinions. Also I ran out of space for question 5 and 6 thus I shortened them.


ABOUT THE POLL OPTIONS (inside the spoiler tag)

Spoiler :

The last part is the central part of the poll. That is in the first two: The major factor for destroying the building is the Explosion/Impact and the JetFuel. Ofcourse it might be a combination of those but in the end it boils up to the same conclusion: it was a plane that destroyed the buildings.

The "Something strikes the building" is meant as an alternative to the plane. That is what ever effect that "something" had, it destroyed the building.

The lower three are meant to represent the people that do not belive that the plane crash itself (with the Jet fuel, explosion and impact force) could ever destroy both buildings as some belive it did.

The last three are self explanatory IMO.

 

[GoodEnoughForMe]

Here you go.

 

[nonconformist]

What do you think? Please also include a small reason to why you think so.

I have one big reason to think so:

Spoiler :

 

[Godwynn]

I have one big reason to think so:

Spoiler :

God damnit noncon, I gotta go get a paper towel now to wipe off my monitor off.

 

[brennan]

The crux of the conspiracy theory is the idea that the collision/fire weren't damaging enough to destroy the fireproofing around the main supports (untrue) and hot enough to seriously weaken the structural members (untrue). Once you understand this you can take the tinfoil hat off.

Have you been talking to Xenocrates?

 

[Godwynn]

Here you go.

And here...

 

[Ondskan]

Being an other theory. *Chuckle*


Seriously though, could you please be a bit serious about this. I'd like to in the future be able to publish it. Ofcourse only the poll not the names of anyone who wrote anything. I'll make a disclaimer.

 

[MobBoss]

There is no conspiracy. There is only paranoia.

 

[skadistic]

My opinion is that "truthers" are idiots.

 

[brennan]

There is no conspiracy. There is only paranoia.

My opinion is that "truthers" are idiots.

I'm just going to take the opportunity to agree with these two.

 

[GrandAdmiral]

The claim is that the planes did not take down the buildings on impact. The jet fuel caused a fire that melted the steel skeleton of the building. How is that against the laws of physics? What I find funny is that half the people making these claims (not the original conspirators but the supporters) don't know the laws of physics yet they feel the need to enlighten us on whats physically impossible.

 

[Ondskan]

Nevermind

I'll just say that there is an option for that so feel free to vote.

 

[Fifty]

There is no conspiracy. There is only paranoia.

My opinion is that "truthers" are idiots.

You guys are so indocrinated by the media it isn't even funny

Skyscrapers weigh way more than planes. If I ran a stick into a rock, the stick would break and the rock would stay the same. It's very simple.

 

[Darth_Pugwash]

It's all a gubmint conspiracy.

Also, the moon landings were filmed in area 51, George Bush is the robot devil, and Elvis and Adolf Hitler have been secretly living together in Argentina since their so called 'deaths'.

Open your eyes, people!

 

[Ondskan]

Hi.

Please refrain from saying that someone who writes something is wrong.
Do explain your oppinion about this. (Even though it obviously may contradict with the person, saying that the person is wrong will fuel a discussion. A discussion I do not want as it is not the topic).

 

[GrandAdmiral]

You guys are so indocrinated by the media it isn't even funny

Skyscrapers weigh way more than planes. If I ran a stick into a rock, the stick would break and the rock would stay the same. It's very simple.

Don't warships weigh more than anti-ship missiles?

 

[GrandAdmiral]

Hi.

Please refrain from saying that someone who writes something is wrong.
Do explain your oppinion about this. (Even though it obviously may contradict with the person, saying that the person is wrong will fuel a discussion. A discussion I do not want as it is not the topic).

Lol. You post a poll on a discussion board asking people to express their opinion and you don't want a discussion.

 

[Godwynn]

I don't see the option for:

The planes crash into the building(s). The burning jet fuel weakens the steel construction.

 

[Fifty]

Don't warships weigh more than anti-ship missiles?

Ya but missles compensate by causing EXPLOSHUNS duh Thus reinforcing the point that it was a BOMB and not COLLISHUN.

 

[Ondskan]

I'll add an edition to that each of the poll options is meant to be the MAJOR factor for the destruction of the building.
I cannot edit the poll. Lucky this is my test poll. If a moderator wishes to change it, please do to Weakens/melts.


There's details for everyone and a poll can't predict all those details that everyone would like to add and remove. it is limited to 100 symbols and having more poll options than this for a forum like this seems as to much but if more people feel that they need that option I'll PM a moderator to make one more option.