Quackers
The Frog
Define "weaker economy"?!
Less resilient to shocks?
highly volatile?
Less resilient to shocks?
highly volatile?
You prefer flirting with MAD... ok, got it.Sure.
I, on the other hand, don't like endless deficits, a weaker economy, economic instability, rollbacks in individual liberty, a tax burden shifted towards the poor and middle class, lower wages, and selling out the country to special interests.
But hey, whatever floats your boat.
Obviously a matter of opinion. I would argue just the opposite.
You prefer flirting with MAD... ok, got it.
Didn't Kennedy try to lower taxes?
Define "weaker economy"?!
Less resilient to shocks?
highly volatile?
Sure.
I, on the other hand, don't like endless deficits, a weaker economy, economic instability, rollbacks in individual liberty, a tax burden shifted towards the poor and middle class, lower wages, and selling out the country to special interests.
But hey, whatever floats your boat.
Odd that we experienced economic growth...Reagan's deficits weakened the economy. They didn't help it.
Odd that we experienced economic growth...
Democrat deficit spending = helps the economy
Republican deficit spending = weakens the economy
i mean, do you even try to be objective cutlass?![]()
I must have missed the missile crisis where the Soviets nearly attacked Turkey before the US backed down over putting missiles there.The Missile Crisis was similar to the bin Laden raid, but the stakes were higher. It should have never happened, but one could hardly say the Soviets wouldn't have done the same thing if the tables were turned.
What about the corrupt election, Bay of Pigs, involvement in the assassinations of foreign leaders, entering the Viet Nam War, defoliation, support of the coup in Iraq, cover-up of health issues and extra-marital affairs?
Oddly, both Kennedy and Reagan resorted to deficit spending, leading to economic prosperity.
Odd that we experienced economic growth...
Ok, so, wait, did we have a Congress under Reagan? Or was he supreme dictator and we didn't get a Congress until Bill Clinton (the only other dem pres since) came in and returned the country to proper working order?If that were true, why wouldn't he "dislike" the bipartisan Congress that decided to implement the vast majority of those measures even before Obama took office? Why would he only blame Obama for making modest changes which largely saved the American auto industry and many other jobs?
Should I go drag up my old posts with the charts?
I'm not sure of where I saw/read it, but I think that the Bay of Pigs invasion was mostly planned and prepared under Eisenhower's administration and the beginning stages were already under way before Kennedy took over, and it was more or less kept from him until it was too late to do anything about it. Not sure though.
The Missile Crisis was similar to the bin Laden raid, but the stakes were higher. It should have never happened, but one could hardly say the Soviets wouldn't have done the same thing if the tables were turned.
Though Johnson was really the one who got most of the Civil Rights legislation pushed through, but it never would have happened without either Kennedy being President or Republican support. The fact that it lead to a split in the Democratic party is meaningless. The two parties weren't much different until the 1980's anyway.