Justice In America: Another Travesty Finally Overturned

Formaldehyde

Both Fair And Balanced
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
33,999
Location
USA #1
Well, sort of. He had to accept a plea deal that makes it look like he was actually guilty of something. At least he is finally free though...

0422970405_77552c.jpg


http://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/accidents/article1021414.ece

WAUCHULA — Eight years of legal uncertainty ended Friday afternoon as Jean Claude Meus pleaded no contest to two counts of vehicular homicide in a deal that allowed him to walk away from the Hardee County Courthouse for good.

A judge decided he'd already served enough prison time.

Meus was sentenced to time served and one day of probation. The court withheld adjudication of guilt.

Meus turned to Largo attorney John Trevina, who represented him for free, and called him a hero.

"It takes a big heart to do what you've done for me," Meus told Trevina.

Meus, 45, a Haitian immigrant, has been in and out of court — and prison — since a May night in 2001 when the Florida Highway Patrol determined that he caused a deadly crash by falling asleep behind the wheel of a semitrailer truck filled with tomatoes.

Nona A. Moore, 40, and her daughter, Lindsay, 8, were killed instantly after the minivan they were in collided with Meus' truck at a fork in the road known as Seven Mile Point in rural Hardee County.

Meus was sentenced in 2005 to 15 years in state prison for vehicular homicide. But Hardee County Circuit Judge Jeff McKibben granted Meus a new trial last year after an appeals court cleared the way for a new witness to testify — a man who contradicted prosecutors' claims that Meus fell asleep at the wheel and cause the fatal crash.

His name was Juan Otero, a volunteer firefighter and the first responder at the crash scene.

Meus, who now resides in Tennessee with his wife, Rebecca Chenoweth, has captured the support of many in his battle for justice. Chief among them are Nona Moore's family members.

On Friday, the judge told Meus he hopes the example of compassion shown by Moore's family will allow him to live a life without bitterness.

He said he hoped to leave Florida on Monday and return to Tennessee with his wife.
Discuss.
 
Interesting story. Would need to know more to make a value judgment on this either way. Still, 15 years seems to be a lot for someone falling asleep at the wheel. Clearly would be involuntary manslaughter. Either way, if I were Meus I would not ever return to that state again and start his life over again.
 
Interesting story. Would need to know more to make a value judgment on this either way. Still, 15 years seems to be a lot for someone falling asleep at the wheel. Clearly would be involuntary manslaughter. Either way, if I were Meus I would not ever return to that state again and start his life over again.

The story has had a lot of press. It should be a national disgrace by now.

http://www.sptimes.com/2005/11/23/State/Was_justice_3rd_victi.shtml

WAUCHULA - Nona A. Moore and her daughter Lindsey were driving home from a shopping trip four years ago when a truck struck and killed them.

Family members say they consider it a tragic accident.

But a jury decided it was a crime, convicting Jean Claude Meus, a Haitian immigrant, of two counts of vehicular homicide. A judge sent him to prison for 15 years.

Moore's family was stunned.

Now, in a remarkable twist, the family of the victims is fighting to free the man convicted of killing their loved ones.

In her sprawling, grade-school handwriting, 10-year-old Haley Moore, who survived the accident, told a judge: "I know my mom would not want Mr. Meus to go to prison that long. It was only an accident, and I'm not mad and will never be mad at Mr. Meus. Sincerely, Haley Moore."

Next to her words, she drew a flower.

Moore's sisters and surviving daughters, who are white, say they are convinced Meus' conviction was the result of an all-white jury in a small Florida town taking vengeance on a black man.

"Wauchula is a small town with lots of prejudice, biased opinions," Moore's sister, Dana Christenson, told the court during Meus' appeal. "I was born and raised there, so I know how things work. I believe the jury did what they thought Nona and her family would have wanted. Well, let me tell you, this is not what we want."


The case has gained attention amid two other recent high-profile fatal traffic accidents - Jennifer Porter and William Thornton IV. On Nov. 5, Porter was sentenced to house arrest and probation for leaving the scene of an accident that left two children dead in Tampa. On Sept. 16, Thornton was sentenced to 30 years in prison after killing a Citrus County couple.

At a recent meeting in Tampa, NAACP leaders questioned the fairness of all three cases. Porter is white, her victims black. Thornton and Meus are black, their victims white. All were first-time offenders. At the meeting, Meus' attorney John Trevena and other supporters said they feared Meus' skin color sealed his fate. The case has drawn attention from television personality Geraldo Rivera and the Rev. Al Sharpton's National Action Network.

"It's about the mentality of Floridians," said the group's national youth director, the Rev. Jarrett B. Maupin II. "Is there a separate level of justice laid down for those of different skin color?"

A key difference between Meus and the other cases: His conviction - not his sentence - is the main issue. His sentence of 15 years is less than the 18.5 to 30 years called for by state law. But the racial disparity remains, his attorney and supporters say.

"This isn't just these cases, let's face it, most minorities don't have enough money to get a great lawyer. . . . Unless you have somebody that's standing up to make sure justice is served, it's not going to happen," said Rebecca Chenoweth, Meus' fiancee. "If it's in a small town like Jean Claude was, you might as well forget it."

The fatal accident happened about 9:30 p.m. May 11, 2001, at a fork in the road known as Seven Mile Point in Hardee County, a rural area of orange groves and farmland in south-central Florida.

Moore, a child care worker, was driving home to Wauchula from a shopping trip at the mall in nearby Sebring. Ashley, then 12, her oldest daughter, was sitting in the front in the family's minivan. Haley and Lindsey were in the back.

At an intersection, a semitrailer truck appeared, Ashley recalls. Her mother screamed. Horns beeped. The truck tipped over, crushing the van the beneath it.

Moore and Lindsey were killed instantly, Christenson said.

Ashley yelled for help. Meus says he got out of the cab and peered into the van. He could see Ashley. She asked him if she was going to die.

Meus' truck had been packed with tomatoes earlier that day in Immokalee. Passers-by scooped buckets of tomatoes, tossing them on the ground, hoping to lighten the load, Christenson said.

Ashley remembers lying on the ground, surrounded by ants and tomatoes, as she waited to be taken to a hospital.

State troopers put Meus in the back of a patrol car. As they processed the accident scene for several hours, they returned to check on Meus and found him asleep. Troopers said they had to knock on the window several times to wake him.

Prosecutors filed charges against Meus more than a year later, accusing him of recklessly falling asleep behind the wheel - his driving log suggested he had been behind the wheel too long - and speeding.

It took the jury less than an hour to find him guilty on both counts.


Meus appealed. As the case wound its way through the appeal court, Moore's daughters and sisters began working for his freedom. Christenson filed a victim impact statement with the court saying Meus did nothing wrong, that he misunderstood some of the troopers' questions at the scene of the accident because of a "language barrier."

But the 2nd District Court of Appeal denied the appeal in September 2004 and last March, Circuit Judge Charles B. Curry ruled he wouldn't trim Meus' sentence.

Trevena is now preparing a motion for post-conviction relief, raising several issues. Among them: statements one of the jurors made to a television reporter, saying that the prosecution didn't prove Meus fell asleep, but the jury convicted him anyway because two people were dead.

Another juror told attorneys she believed every accident involving a fatality should be charged as a crime. Other concerns include: There were no blacks in the jury pool; no physician testified whether a head injury sustained in the crash caused Meus to mimic symptoms of sleepiness; he wasn't charged until 15 months after the accident; and the defense attorney didn't call many mitigation witnesses at the sentencing, including Moore's daughters.

Meus also plans to ask Gov. Jeb Bush for executive clemency.

Prosecutors had enough information to charge Meus with the crime, said Chip Thullbery, spokesman for the 10th Judicial Circuit State Attorney's Office. He said sentencing guidelines for vehicular homicide have increased sharply over time. That's the Legislature's doing, not prosecutors', he said.

Moore's husband, Darrell, said he agrees with prosecutors. His wife's death destroyed his family, he said. A rift remains. The girls now live with their aunt Beth Jahna in a large, antebellum-style home a few miles from the accident site.

Darrell Moore has sued the company that packed Meus' truck with tomatoes. But he said he also feels Meus should be held responsible.

"He went through an intersection," he said. "I heard him say on television that he was trying to avoid another car. That's just not true. I feel he's responsible, I really do. I don't think it's an issue of color, I really don't."

His oldest daughter, now 16, disagrees.

"We want to help him," Ashley said.

Her aunt, sitting nearby, nodded.

"We won't stop until he gets out," Christenson said.

http://blogs.tampabay.com/media/2008/04/jailed-trucker.html

It has taken years, but Trevena has finally won a new trial for the 44-year-old Haitian immigrant truck driver, who started a 15-year prison sentence in 2003 after his conviction on vehicular homicide charges after an accident in which prosecutors alleged he fell asleep at the wheel.

I wrote about Meus and Trevena back in 2005, when Trevena tipped WTVT-Ch. 13 investigative reporter Doug Smith to the seeming disparity. At the time, Jennifer Porter, a 29-year-old, part-Cuban woman widely perceived to be white, had received three years of probation, two years of house arrest and 500 hours of community service after leaving the scene of a car accident in which she struck two children, who died.

Didn't hurt that she was represented by the most powerful criminal lawyer in town, Barry Cohen.

I wrote about how national media outlets were surprisingly indifferent to Meus' story, despite its parallels with the Porter case and questionable outcome. Trevena and Smith stuck with the case, however, and saw their efforts pay off Tuesday. See Smith's story from last night here.

Meus, who stayed at the scene and cooperated with investigators, was charged with homicide in Hardee County for the accident, which killed a 40-year-old woman and her daughter. His case was striking enough that two sisters of the woman killed in the accident took up his cause, arguing that the trial wasn't fair.

Smith's story, along with a later piece in the St. Petersburg Times, suggested Meus may have faced tougher charges and received a stiffer sentence because of his race and lack of wealth (Trevena didn't represent him in the original trial). Smith noted, for example, that another trucker, Thomas Smith, had a similar accident in 2002 in Hardee County which killed a man, but that driver admitted falling asleep at the wheel and got a traffic citation for it as his only punishment.

The difference between Smith and Meus? Smith is white and Meus is not.

But it sounds like justice may finally be at hand, thanks to a persistent lawyer and TV reporter.

http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/01/wtvt-tv_tampa_doug_smith_small.php

WTVT-TV, Tampa, & Doug Smith: ‘Small Town Injustice’

By Hillary Atkin, Special to TelevisionWeek

The complex legal and emotional saga at the heart of WTVT-TV’s “Small Town Justice” began on May 11, 2001, when a fatal accident on a Florida state highway killed Nona Moore and her 8-year-old daughter Lindsey. Two other girls survived the crash, which occurred when the driver of a tomato truck rolled over the family van.

The driver, Jean Claude Meus, was a Haitian immigrant who had lived in the United States for 20 years. Although drugs or alcohol did not play a part in the crash, a jury ruled that he had fallen asleep at the wheel and sentenced him to 15 years in a maximum-security prison, a sentence equivalent to those handed down in many fatal DUI cases.

After he was incarcerated, WTVT, the Fox affiliate in Tampa, Fla., got a call, and investigative reporter Doug Smith and producer Lisa Blegen set out to determine if the punishment fit the crime. Over the course of two and a half years, they did nearly two dozen stories on the case centered in Wauchula, Fla., a rural town in the central part of the state built around family, faith and football.

“We thought, ‘Wow, what a harsh sentence.’ That was initially it. He really got hammered,” said Ms. Blegen. “He said he wasn’t asleep. We took a closer look at sentence, and a closer look at the investigation. Even the victim’s sisters didn’t think he committed a crime. How is the public served by this? The problems with the evidence came out later.”


During their jailhouse interviews, Mr. Meus said after a car cut him off, he swerved, lost control and tipped over onto the Moores’ vehicle. He said he had slept for 10 hours before the wreck.

Court records show four of the six jurors had read about the accident before the trial, and the jury took less than an hour to reach a guilty verdict on two counts of vehicular manslaughter.


Mr. Smith and Ms. Blegen wondered if the defendant got a fair trial from the all-white jury in a town where emotions were running high.

They attempted to interview the jurors, but initially only one agreed to speak—and admitted the prosecution did not prove that Mr. Meus fell asleep. The prosecutor’s office wouldn’t talk. Family members of the victims said the truck driver’s deep sorrow over the accident was punishment enough, and that they forgave him.

“When we looked at the investigation with a critical eye, we found that the Florida Highway Patrol had made numerous mistakes,” said Mr. Smith. “The lead investigator went to high school with Nona Moore. That was the small-town nature of the case. Everyone knew and loved the Moores, two people were dead, but Jean Claude Meus didn’t get a fair shake.”

The investigative team went on to expose a story the jury never heard from an eyewitness to the accident who came forward after the first televised report. They discovered that Florida Highway Patrol investigators did not interview Juan Otero, the first person on the scene, and his friend—who happened to be volunteer firefighters. They were engaged in rescue efforts and saw Mr. Meus come out of the cab of the truck. An estimated 100 people were at the scene of the accident, and investigators said they did not need to interview all of them.

Ms. Blegen and Mr. Smith also brought in a traffic reconstruction expert, Wiley Howell, who showed that diagrams of the accident presented to the jury were not drawn to scale and therefore were flawed evidence.

“That diagram was one critical piece of evidence that landed him behind bars. It was simply an approximation,” Mr. Smith said. “That’s how you do it in a small town. It was hand-drawn, not a computer simulation.”


Mr. Meus, who always said he believed in the justice system, appealed the verdict and, after three years behind bars, walked out of Hardee County Jail a free man in April 2008.

“For both of us, the experience has had a profound effect, because he was such a positive person despite the obstacles he faced,” said Ms. Blegen. “He always believed the truth would set him free. It’s amazing to meet a guy like that with such faith.”
 
I just noticed that most of your judicial travesty stories are vehicular homicide and you're an avid driver.
 
LOL. Florida laws are really draconian in this particular area, as they are in many states. There have been a number of high-visiblity cases where affluent whites are basically given a free pass while anybody else is put underneath the jail for the rest of their lives.

But it is something I do worry about to some extent because my current street car happens to have a roll cage and is set up for racing. Given the current climate to call auto accidents homicides at the least provocation, it is probably not the wisest thing to do.
 
What exactly would the first responder be able to tell? That he wasnt sleeping AFTER the accident?
 
First, the accident happened early in the morning. The truck had just been loaded and it was his first haul of the day.

Second, you can usually tell when someone is sleepy or is suffering from an injury from the crash, especially if you are a first-responder and are used to accident scenes. To not interview the witnesses who were first on the scene is an obvious screwup, especially when they were expert witnesses in this particular case. They may have even seen the truck driver swerve to miss the other car.

Third, basically everybody agrees that the prosecution did not prove that he had been sleeping, and he never admitted to being so.

Fourth, these trucks are typically not in great condition and are frequently overloaded.

Fifth, this is just one more example of immmigrants being railroaded in the interest of retribution instead of seeking justice in a rural area the state of Florida.
 
What exactly would the first responder be able to tell? That he wasnt sleeping AFTER the accident?

I think the results of the crash might be different between a person asleep at the wheel, versus one awake; just a guess, however.
 
When someone is an accident, they're going to be wide awake with the adrenaline pumping.

"everybody", meaning the people they quoted in the story. It's one sided, you're not hearing the other side. Everything in court always has two sides, on expert saying one thing and another expert saying something else. It all comes down to which attorney is better at his job. And thats the way it works whether you're black, white, green, orange, male, female, american, jewish, arab, whatever.

Sounds like this guy just had a horsehockey attorney. I always find that funny...if the case is just so bad then the attorney should have no problem defending it. Guess he just sucks at his job.

"Fourth, these trucks are typically not in great condition and are frequently overloaded."

Thats the drivers responsibility.
 
First, the accident happened early in the morning.

Second, you can usually tell when someone is sleepy or is suffering from an injury from the crash, especially if you are a first-responder and are used to accident scenes. To not interview the witnesses who were first on the scene is an obvious screwup, especially when they were expert witnesses in this particular case.

Third, basically everybody agrees that the prosecution did not prove that he had been sleeping.

Fourth, this is just one more example of immmigrants being railroaded in the interest of retribution instead of justice in a rural area the state of Florida.

Not that I don't think it's ridiculous to give someone 15 years for this, but when you get into a crash the adrenaline rush will make anyone who isn't dead wide awake.
 
Sounds like this guy just had a horsehockey attorney. I always find that funny...if the case is just so bad then the attorney should have no problem defending it. Guess he just sucks at his job.
I hope you are never in the position of facing homicide charges with a public defender, even though you are apparently a white ctizen instead of a black Hatian.

But that's not the main point. The prosecution should have never brought these charges, much less over a year after the accident had occurred.
 
If it were working, it would have been cleared up years ago.

As opposed to never?

Form said:
The story has had a lot of press. It should be a national disgrace by now.

If it happened in a Florida court, why should it be a national travesity?

But lets ask the following questions:

The sentencing guidelines for vehicular homocide in Florida call for a sentence between 18.5 to 30. He got 15. If 15 is deemed too harsh for killing two innocent people and destroying a family, what is indeed a fair sentence? How many years should he have served for killing the mother and daughter, even accidently, because he was speeding and had been driving without rest.

So, even if you consider this a 'national travisty'....how much jail time should he have served?

I hope you are never in the position of facing homicide charges with a public defender, even though you are apparently a white ctizen instead of a black Hatian.

But that's not the point. The prosecution should have never brought these charges in the first place. Yet you are apparently trying to rationalize this travesty of justice.

What charges SHOULD they have brought?

Or should people who drive negligently kill people they should be allowed to simply walk away from it?
 
I hope you are never in the position of facing homicide charges with a public defender, even though you are apparently a white ctizen instead of a black Hatian.

But that's not the point. The prosecution should have never brought these charges in the first place. Yet you are apparently trying to rationalize this travesty of justice.

Sorry, I'm just saying how it is. I am agreeing with you, the system IS a joke. However, there are not many alternatives.

Have you ever sat at a trial? All it is is two people aruging a point and strying to spin eveidence, trip up witnesses, etc. to make their story more believeable of the two. Thats what it is. A good lawyer can tear any witness up and find holes in the most water proof story.

And they must have felt they had enough evidence or a good enough case to even bother with it.
 
Interesting story. Would need to know more to make a value judgment on this either way. Still, 15 years seems to be a lot for someone falling asleep at the wheel. Clearly would be involuntary manslaughter. Either way, if I were Meus I would not ever return to that state again and start his life over again.

I think it can depend on the evidence of logbooks of their rest stops. Federal law is pretty strict about how long an over-the-road driver can work between rest stops to prevent stuff like this from happening.
 
I think it can depend on the evidence of logbooks of their rest stops. Federal law is pretty strict about how long an over-the-road driver can work between rest stops to prevent stuff like this from happening.
Once again, he was a produce truck driver who only worked during the days, and it was his first load.
 
Once again, he was a produce truck driver who only worked during the days, and it was his first load.

Are you really trying to say that someone cant be tired driving their first load of the day?

What if his log book showed he had driven for 16+ hours the day/evening prior and didnt get enough rest for the next day?

And just fwiw, trying to argue that he wasnt tired because its his first run would be a strawman arguement wouldnt it? ;)
 
What bothers me is the "small town justice" aspect of it all.

There's a rule somewhere in the books (at least here in Quebec) that any police investigation on actions by the police is to be handled by another police organization (eg, if the provincial police flunked, either the municipal or federal police handle the investigation). This is because even if the policemen involved in the investigation are at their most professional, they are still stuck in the same atmosphere, the same mentality as the people being investigated, and they can hardly be expected to have an unbiased look.

Seems to me that when dealing with deaths in small counties, particularly when one party is local and the other is not, and particularly particularly when the accused is a stranger and the victim a local, there should be rules about these lines, at least with regard to jury selection (the jury must be built from a state pool, employing only people from outside the county).

Probably too complicated to properly manage, I guess. But trying someone in the small town his alleged victims come from when he's not from there is hardly likely to ever be a fair trial.
 
Back
Top Bottom