Let us test Darwin, teacher says

[beingofone]

Bluemofia,
Thanks for sticking to the subject and I enjoyed our discussion. You addressed the argument and not the person.





I just learned a very valuable lesson. The statements below are deep philosophical and scientific postulates of immense reasoning.

I must learn to stick to the guidelines of what is critical analysis of scientific theory as I have yet to address these very well thought out logical positions.

I hope you're joking...

That is the most ridiculous plan to test for the existence of a creator I've ever heard.

I'm having trouble believing that you sincerely mean both of the above quotes.

Empty words.

You really don't have any idea what you're talking about, do you?

If you're just going to resort to base attacks and simple lies

I see; you really do not make any sense.

Schools must teach science in the science classroom, not some pseudo-philosophical religious jargon to fill an emotional void of Christian children and parents.

Or... it could just possibly be because you're trying to talk about subjects which you really don't know anything about.

Try applying biology to evolution, and not abstract equations with zero relevance to anything at all. Actually your agenda is very clear...

ample demonstration that you haven't the foggiest clue about math, and are speaking gibberish.

Oh yeah, a legend in his own mind.

How about anyone who has actually taken a biology class and comprehends what is going on disagrees with you?

The calculator didn't seem to understand your nonsense.

It doesn't take a genius to figure that one out.

I suggest you read a biology textbook and open your mind to science. Evolution is an elementary concept, if you cannot comprehend it, then oh well for you.

It almost appears as though he is attempting to confuse the hell out of everyone via the Matrix method - lots of words, but no substance.. no meaning.

hard to tell if he's trolling, ignorant, or just really young or something

if you continue to post like a frog we will treat you like a frog.

Enough with the e-penis length contest already.

Good, less time blabbering about your less than impressive resume, more time staying focused on the topic.

I do not deny physics/math/chemistry all are very pertinent to evolution, however what you were blabbering on about was not.

If you are as confident as you sound, go tell all the biology professors at all the colleges. They'd need a laugh after all the hard work they have been doing.

You however have not even brushed the surface of any relevant math.

Would you care to talk science/evolution, or is it your weak spot as everyone here has already suspected?

More jargon.

Planck's axiom of originality states that this is impossible on a macro-level.

Either way, your perpostness discloses your clear lack of understanding of the lollypop rule. Dr Rection's thesis on maximum betazedal drift makes this quite clear, too - haven't you read it?

instead of whining

I do not have time to post, as my statements are "not in context" of the conversation.

I need time to digest these astute observations of obvious weighty logical observations and skill.

 

[Erik Mesoy]

So, basically, you're annoyed that people are pointing out your flaws instead of accepting your "1/0 = infinity"-type statements. Is that correct?

Incidentally, you are not "the religious guy". Several of the people arguing with you are religious.

 

[beingofone]

So, basically, you're annoyed that people are pointing out your flaws instead of accepting your "1/0 = infinity"-type statements. Is that correct?

Incidentally, you are not "the religious guy". Several of the people arguing with you are religious.

Another great example; your post is 100 percent AD HOM, slap full of logical fallacy and entirely no way to respond without getting a 'warning' from some goody two shoes reporting me and then a mindless bot finds me guilty.

Not one of your posts contained substance, proof, examples, premise, or conclusion - you just pronounce it like you saying it makes it so. That is called a logical fallacy oh great teacher - oops - AD HOM - your okay though cause the blind will only see my infraction.

You say I am annoyed - as if that is proof of something?
How is that an argument genius?

Pointing out my flaws - as if this is an argument of any kind whatsoever.

If you look - there are no arguments - now if I respond with an AD HOM myself, some goody two shoes turns me in because my AD HOMS are on the 'other' side?

Hypocrytical double standards like I did something wrong - I get warned - you come right behind and do the exact same thing all over again.

Now its me who will be warned for discussing it - double standards by the emotional believing they are thinking will hold me responsible. Oblivious to what is really happening - it will only be seen that my AD HOMS are not liked - yours will get off scott free.

No; I will not participate in a loaded discussion - it doesn`t work that way. What is fair for me should be fair for you.

My last post - have a nice life.

 

[Atlas14]

Another great example; your post is 100 percent AD HOM, slap full of logical fallacy and entirely no way to respond without getting a 'warning' from some goody two shoes reporting me and then a mindless bot finds me guilty.

Not one of your posts contained substance, proof, examples, premise, or conclusion - you just pronounce it like you saying it makes it so. That is called a logical fallacy oh great teacher - oops - AD HOM - your okay though cause the blind will only see my infraction.

You say I am annoyed - as if that is proof of something?
How is that an argument genius?

Pointing out my flaws - as if this is an argument of any kind whatsoever.

If you look - there are no arguments - now if I respond with an AD HOM myself, some goody two shoes turns me in because my AD HOMS are on the 'other' side?

Hypocrytical double standards like I did something wrong - I get warned - you come right behind and do the exact same thing all over again.

Now its me who will be warned for discussing it - double standards by the emotional believing they are thinking will hold me responsible. Oblivious to what is really happening - it will only be seen that my AD HOMS are not liked - yours will get off scott free.

No; I will not participate in a loaded discussion - it doesn`t work that way. What is fair for me should be fair for you.

My last post - have a nice life.

Has it ever occurred to you that you still have not, in almost 4 pages of nonsense, even mentioned anything slightly about evolution or biology? Your inability to discuss, let alone debate such a topic has given us enough insight into your wonderful, much-valued input.

 

[brennan]

E = Mc2...energy is mass with tremendous velocity.

I just got this far and...wow.

You are oh so not a Physicist.

At this point I am suspecting that you lot have all been taken in by a sophisticated Turing Machine. All the words are very long but taken as a whole they make no sense.

...back to reading the thread.

 

[brennan]

If you reverse the equation another paradigm can be seen. Mass is energy with its velocity reduced.

I am now nearly crying with laughter...back to the thread...

 

[Mise]

At this point I am suspecting that you lot have all been taken in by a sophisticated Turing Machine. All the words are very long but taken as a whole they make no sense.

It's the only possible explanation!

 

[brennan]

It has to be a Turing machine without a dictionary though. Many typos.

My calculator said -E- by the way. It's a bit old though, maybe it doesn't understand the universal constant?

 

[Mise]

It has to be a Turing machine without a dictionary though. Many typos.

My calculator said -E- by the way. It's a bit old though, maybe it doesn't understand the universal constant?

You have to admit though, even if the spellchecker's not that great, the "Summarize" feature is MUCH better than MS Word...

 

[Adamb0mb]

It has to be a Turing machine without a dictionary though. Many typos.

My calculator said -E- by the way. It's a bit old though, maybe it doesn't understand the universal constant?

Try again, on my fifth attempt of plugging in 1/0 my calculator said 'God Exists'.

Now I believe!

 

[brennan]

Still -E- and I tried it SIX times.

 

[Mathilda]

Moderator Action: As this has developed into personal attacks only, time to close the thread.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889