LGBT flags and the Political Left (split from Random Rants LXXIII)

[Kyriakos]

Quite literally incorrect. I don't understand how people can be this confident in asserting themselves on questions of definition. All relevant literature explicitly goes against what you think.

It's also bewildering that in the same breath you can suggest pansexuals are open to having a good time with their car or the local cat (which is amazingly rude to imply, by the way) but then switch gears to saying "pansexuality is the same thing as bisexuality" and then just using a eraser on the distinctions between the two because, I dunno, you don't like thinking about them.

Having this thread split off and letting people soapbox about how LGBT+ people should define themselves was an amazing mistake.

Mkay, that is nice and all, and your post manages to include outrage while keeping to being trivial & inconsistent to boot.
Moreover, it isn't rude to include people who are into having sex with other species, in a supposedly all-inclusive movement. I have to suppose that less damage has resulted from than than in most other cases; after all people historically used (and still use) most animals as slave labour, so who cares if some also have sexual relations with them. (imo it is kind of its own punishment, really).

Moderator Action: Warned for trolling. --LM
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889

 

[Synobun]

Mkay, that is nice and all, and your post manages to include outrage while keeping to being trivial & inconsistent to boot

Yes, outrage. Telling you you're wrong and being rude means I am hysterical. After all, everyone is entitled to their opinions. Shouldn't I be okay with people saying "to me" that one thing means something else, when that "thing" being opined over is often someone's identity and isn't even related to your life's experience at all? People who are pansexual should make way for this new definition of yours, otherwise they are just being trivial.

 

[Kyriakos]

Yes, outrage. Telling you you're wrong and being rude means I am hysterical. After all, everyone is entitled to their opinions. Shouldn't I be okay with people saying "to me" that one thing means something else, when that "thing" being opined over is often someone's identity and isn't even related to your life's experience at all? People who are pansexual should make way for this new definition of yours, otherwise they are just being trivial.

Well if you weren't outraged you have a funny way of showing it; or just didn't use the right sentence structure. It's ok.

 

[Synobun]

Moreover, it isn't rude to include people who are into having sex with other species, in a supposedly all-inclusive movement. I have to suppose that less damage has resulted from than than in most other cases; after all people historically used (and still use) most animals as slave labour, so who cares if some also have sexual relations with them. (imo it is kind of its own punishment, really).

You're being serious, aren't you? You actually went back and added this to a post that was already problematic.

This is peak sexual conservatism. Let LGBT+ people possess some type of public identity and next you know they're sodomizing animals. Amazing. Where's that picture about liberalism and the acceptance of gays? You'd love it. Has someone making out with a giant insect.

 

[Kyriakos]

You're being serious, aren't you? You actually went back and added this to a post that was already problematic.

This is peak sexual conservatism. Let LGBT+ people possess some type of public identity and next you know they're sodomizing animals. Amazing. Where's that picture about liberalism and the acceptance of gays? You'd love it. Has someone making out with a giant insect.

Let me guess: you are still not posting in outrage.
Ie i think we are done here.

 

[Arakhor]

Moderator Action: Yes, we are. Thread closed.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889