LGBT rampage

Sorry I'm not fitting to your high standard frame of reference - I will have to make due with the other low-lives.
:huh:

Labour and Conservatives are two sides of the same coin
The only way that distinguishes Labour from the Lib Dems is that the former have their own side, but the latter have to share with the Tories. :p
 
:huh:


The only way that distinguishes Labour from the Lib Dems is that the former have their own side, but the latter have to share with the Tories. :p

No they were distinguished by their support for proportional representation, only reason I voted for them, the other big things they seemed to support like no tuition fees I didn't like at all. But they screwed up the reason I voted for them.
 
You criticising me, punk? huh?

Well, speak up son, I dont do smilies very well.

edit: thats for TF ;)
 
they are still in the news here (Australia) for defending institutionalize acceptance of voilence against children... hopefully its stopped,but how are we to know that,as very recent cover ups still keep coming to light
Well then by that definition you will put the Government of Australia as a hate group since some of it's behaviour in the past
As a Christian, I consider their biblical beliefs to be wrong.
Jesus said this about the Bible, Thy word is truth. So you are saying Jesus is wrong in what he said? How are you a Christian when you don't follow Christ?
I guess we're the real bigots here for being intolerant of the likes of david duke and the kkk etc

(using mobby's "YOU'RE INTOLERANT OF MY INTOLERANCE!" logic)
I never knew that people's colour of their skin was the same as their sexual orientation.
My point exactly.

In fact, I'd be rather cross as a Christian if anyone would imply that government recognition influences my religious take on the matter. They are separate. I can see why Christians would be against a law that denies every church and every cleric the choice not to want to host a gay marriage.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2158442/Cameron-CANNOT-protect-Church-gay-marriage-laws-says-Justice-minister.html
David Cameron’s promise to protect churches from gay marriage laws could hit legal hurdles, a justice minister admitted yesterday.

Crispin Blunt said it would be hard to guarantee that clergy would not face court challenges if they refused to preside over same-sex unions.

‘We’re seeking to protect, indeed, proscribe religious organisations from offering gay marriage,’ said Mr Blunt, who announced two years ago that he is gay.
You were saying? Once Gay marriage is put into law it will mean that Churches will have to perform them. Once the law recognises Gay marriage it will make it inevitable. There are plenty of examples in America where shops can't stop giving a service, such as a wedding cake store, to provide for Gay marriages, so we know it won't stop there.

If this was the other way around say, a Conservative Christian going after a Gay group, this would automatically be classified as a hate crime.
 
The Australian government has committed deplorable acts in the past and if you need to quote the Daily Fail on any moral issue, you've pretty much already lost.
 
Jesus said this about the Bible, Thy word is truth. So you are saying Jesus is wrong in what he said? How are you a Christian when you don't follow Christ?

I do follow Christ, which is why I consider them to be wrong. Its all about the interpretation and they have it wrong.
 
The same reason(s) that makes you sure you have the bible interpreted correctly.

I'd be surprised if you did as much research as I do in trying to ascertain that.

And even then, I continually try to learn more about it. Thats a lifelong endeavor; not something you ever really stop doing...
 
Did you ever think about using the same sources that most Christians use? It isn't a matter of how much time you spend rereading the same scriptures over and over again.
 
Well then by that definition you will put the Government of Australia as a hate group since some of it's behaviour in the past

well they are paying millions in compensation for their(our?) past actions... but i would not go so far as to call them a hate group like .... but i would draw attention to bad practices .... like i did with the catholic church...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2158442/Cameron-CANNOT-protect-Church-gay-marriage-laws-says-Justice-minister.html

You were saying? Once Gay marriage is put into law it will mean that Churches will have to perform them. Once the law recognises Gay marriage it will make it inevitable. There are plenty of examples in America where shops can't stop giving a service, such as a wedding cake store, to provide for Gay marriages, so we know it won't stop there.

there is a big fuss made about this ... equal rights, equall pay. no discrimination against women ... no discrimination for sexual orientation

if a wedding cake maker dose not want to make a cake with the words gay marriage on it...fine, thats artistic expression, people will go elsewhere... if a store will not sell a cake to gay people,women, black people, Jews, divorced people, disabled people .... well that is an entirely different matter
if churches don't want to be a "player" in society then get of of being business men in the guise of church charity... it will in no way affect what your or any church does ... as can be seen from the continued refusal of most churches to marry divorced hetro sexual couples ... pointing out that they can get a civil marriage... if the full power of womens lib and the acceptance of divorce and re- marriage have had no effect on the rights of churches ... its a furphy to suggest that gay people will
 
Did you ever think about using the same sources that most Christians use? It isn't a matter of how much time you spend rereading the same scriptures over and over again.

And thats precisely what I dont do. I've often mentioned of using various concordances to study the actual root meaning of words used in scripture; and certainly dont depend on any one specific translation, although I do prefer the New King James as a base.

But I also try to go even further by studying the history of the cultures as well as the root words used in the Greek and Hebrew. That helps as well.
 
You were saying?
I can see why Christians would be against a law that denies every church and every cleric the choice not to want to host a gay marriage.

You were reading?

In fact, I'd be rather cross as a Christian if anyone would imply that government recognition influences my religious take on the matter. They are separate.

You were ignoring?
 
And thats precisely what I dont do. I've often mentioned of using various concordances to study the actual root meaning of words used in scripture; and certainly dont depend on any one specific translation, although I do prefer the New King James as a base.

But I also try to go even further by studying the history of the cultures as well as the root words used in the Greek and Hebrew. That helps as well.
You should try taking some college-level science classes, especially geology and biology, as well as a comparative religion class which explores the similar mythological roots of all Western religions. In particular, you should study how Catholicism has radically changed from the days of Galileo to present, and how much science in particular has modified their dogma.
 
You should try taking some college-level science classes, especially geology and biology, as well as a comparative religion class which explores the similar mythological roots of all Western religions. In particular, you should study how Catholicism has radically changed from the days of Galileo to present, and how much science in particular has modified their dogma.

I have, especially the biology (was pre-med remember). My faith includes a God that could create beings to evolve. I mean why not?
 
I have, especially the biology (was pre-med remember). My faith includes a God that could create beings to evolve. I mean why not?
How do you view creation? (will not ask for proof or the science behind it, be as subjective and have a guess as you like)

God creates a Universe 13.7 bil years ago. Does he create Earth or does he guide matter and energy to make Earth appear? It would be impressive if he set things in motion at atomic level 13.7 billion years ago to make all this happen.

Does man get created separately, or does life in general? That sort of thing.
 
I have, especially the biology (was pre-med remember). My faith includes a God that could create beings to evolve. I mean why not?

How much did you complete, and how much of it do you actually use in your attempts to understand your own religion?

You have to ignore much of biology, or any other hard science for that matter as Ziggy just pointed out, in order to rationalize any sort of evangelical interpretation of the Bible, much less a fundamentalist one.
 
Back
Top Bottom