Longest ever serving member of Congress retires!

Cutlass

The Man Who Wasn't There.
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
48,259
Location
US of A
John Dingell to Retire After Nearly 60 Years in House

By ASHLEY PARKERFEB. 24, 2014


WASHINGTON — Representative John D. Dingell, Democrat of Michigan and the longest-serving member of Congress in history, announced on Monday that he would not seek re-election at the end of his current term.

Mr. Dingell’s retirement, first announced by Detroit newspapers and confirmed by Democratic leadership aides, will come at the end of this year — the end of his 29th full term — and represents the end of a historic tenure in the House that began in 1955. That year, Mr. Dingell, at the age of 29, succeeded his father after he died.

Mr. Dingell, 87, who amassed considerable power as the chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, in June became the longest-serving member of Congress with 20,997 days as a representative. Until then, the record had been held by Senator Robert C. Byrd, Democrat of West Virginia. Mr. Dingell has served under 11 presidents.

In a statement released on Monday, Mr. Dingell said: “Around this time every two years, my wife, Deborah, and I confer on the question of whether I will seek re-election. My standards are high for this job. I put myself to the test and have always known that when the time came that I felt I could not live up to my own personal standard for a member of Congress, it would be time to step aside for someone else to represent this district. That time has come.”

Mr. Dingell asserted jurisdiction over vast expanses of federal policy as the intimidating chairman of the energy committee. In 2008, his fellow Democrats ousted him from the committee chairmanship, where he had reigned as the top Democrat for nearly 30 years.

As he announced his retirement, Mr. Dingell talked about the failings of current lawmakers. “This Congress has been a great disappointment to everyone, members, media, citizens and our country,” he said. “Little has been done in this Congress, with 57 bills passed into law.”

He added, “There will be much blaming and finger pointing back and forth, but the members share fault, much fault; the people share much fault, for encouraging a disregard of our country, our Congress and our governmental system.”

Then he asked Americans to work together. “What unites us is far greater than what divides us,” he said. “No president should have to tell a Congress that if that august body cannot do its task he will do it by executive order.”

Mr. Dingell, 6 feet 3 inches tall, had grown stooped in his later years, walking with the help of a cane (from Harrods in London) or wheeling around on a motorized scooter (with a plaque proclaiming him “the Dean” of the House). But Mr. Dingell said his retirement had as much to do with the changing nature of the body in which he served as with any health concerns.

He had recently begun to bemoan the current culture of Congress — its members’ inability to work together and compromise — and in an interview with The Detroit News, he was even more pointed: “I find serving in the House to be obnoxious,” he told the newspaper. “It’s become very hard because of the acrimony and bitterness, both in Congress and in the streets.”

Mr. Dingell’s retirement is another in a list of liberals who have decided to retire. Earlier this year, Representatives George Miller and Henry A. Waxman, both of California, also announced their retirements.

Mr. Dingell became famous for his so-called Dingell-grams, the elaborate written requests for information from people or agencies he planned to investigate, and he considered his committee’s oversight powers to be far-reaching, often pointing to a map of the Earth when asked what his jurisdiction was.

He also became well known for his support of progressive causes. He voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act — a vote he considers his most important — and presided over the passage of Medicare. (The gavel he used still sits on his desk.) Following the lead of his father, John, who introduced his own national health care legislation at the beginning of every Congress, Mr. Dingell continued the tradition, and voted in favor of President Obama’s signature health care law.

His wife of more than three decades, Deborah, is a power in her own right in Washington. She has served as an auto industry executive and is a close adviser to her husband. She recently considered, but ultimately decided against, a Senate bid. There is speculation that she might run for her husband’s seat.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/25/us/politics/dingell-to-retire-from-congress.html

Given his age, retirement is not really exceptional. Still, it's a loss for Congress, and a loss for the nation. :salute:
 
It must be quite saddening to have so much experience working in reasonably functional Congresses to have to endure this silly partisan nonsense we are currently experiencing.
 
Is that a good thing?

Anyway, I thought his 30 terms were served in one congressional district. Because that's not a good sign.
 
Sure his service is honorable, but is it really a good thing that he served for over half a century?
 
It's not like he was Jesse Helms or Strom Thurmond.
 
If you are an effective congressman/senator, nothing wrong with serving as long as one can. The longer one stays in Washington, the more power one can build up. And Dingell held a lot of power. In fact one of the main problems with Washington today is new congressmen don't respect Seniority and haven't for a while - Seniority allowed the experienced members of the house to control the rambunctious newcomers for decades, allowing for relative stability within the House. When someone like Dingell could be ousted from the chair of the energy committee in 2008, you knew things weren't going to be functional any time soon
 
Sure his service is honorable, but is it really a good thing that he served for over half a century?
It's not like he was Jesse Helms or Strom Thurmond.

Don't look at his record on guns, then.

If you are an effective congressman/senator, nothing wrong with serving as long as one can. The longer one stays in Washington, the more power one can build up. And Dingell held a lot of power. In fact one of the main problems with Washington today is new congressmen don't respect Seniority and haven't for a while - Seniority allowed the experienced members of the house to control the rambunctious newcomers for decades, allowing for relative stability within the House. When someone like Dingell could be ousted from the chair of the energy committee in 2008, you knew things weren't going to be functional any time soon

I would have disagreed with you up to 2010, but after seeing the recent crop of utterly destructive newcomers and a porkless Congress, I'd really like a little bit of the old horse-trading back.
 
@ Goodfella

How is the incumbency advantage diluting the effectiveness of the system? If anything we have been moving away from incumbency power over the last decade - and I certainly wouldn't call the current system more effective now than before.
 
@ Goodfella

How is the incumbency advantage diluting the effectiveness of the system? If anything we have been moving away from incumbency power over the last decade - and I certainly wouldn't call the current system more effective now than before.

Sorry, I'm kind of confused about what you're asking. I just meant that the longer a politician holds an office, the easier it is for him to win reelections and so the process would becomes less about important issues and more about who has greater name recognition and a leg up with donors.
 
Sorry, I'm kind of confused about what you're asking. I just meant that the longer a politician holds an office, the easier it is for him to win reelections and so the process would becomes less about important issues and more about who has greater name recognition and a leg up with donors.


Incumbents do have a lot of advantages in elections. But it's not a steadily increasing advantage. Long serving incumbents do still lose. The advantage that a 5 term incumbent may have over a 1 term incumbent may be large. But the advantage a 10 term incumbent has over a 5 term incumbent, not so much.
 
Incumbents have a huge advantage:
- Name recognition
- money and help from party
- free trips to his state, free mail, staff
- Congress, Senate in particular, is run on seniority system for committees
 
Back
Top Bottom