Kouvb593kdnuewnd
Left Forever
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2012
- Messages
- 4,146
What did they say when they ended the development of past civ games? Looking at the past may let us know the future of Civ VI.
I was the same!!!!Why did @Andrew Johnson [FXS] like your post...![]()
I think communications have changed too much with the social media era to make such a comparison relevant.What did they say when they ended the development of past civ games? Looking at the past may let us know the future of Civ VI.
I don't follow any of the major social media news sities.I think communications have changed too much with the social media era to make such a comparison relevant.
I'm sure that any important tweets of whatever will be copied over to here, too.I don't follow any of the major social media news sities.
What interpretation? My point was that interpreting the hoody to mean that Civ 6 is over is a reflection of the interpreter more than the hoody. I'm not saying that it means that there is going to be more content. It says end of cycle, which could be referring to Civ VI, or it could be NFP. No one knows, at least no one actively participating in this conversation, at any rate. The Tweet itself references NFP and specifically NFP - the poster clearly was referring to NFP. Now, does that mean that there is more content to come? No, it doesn't. But it's a pretty clear thst they didn't post it as an irrefutable declaration that Civ VI is finished either, which was my point.Sure, but you're also choosing to ignore that no reference whatsover is made to NFP in the actual hoodies, which is the object the workers are actually keeping. It just says "Civilization 6: End of Cycle"
You talk about the Rorschach test and then seem to proceed as if it couldn't apply to your own interpretation.
I think the real question is what does the front of the hoodie say?Sure, but you're also choosing to ignore that no reference whatsover is made to NFP in the actual hoodies, which is the object the workers are actually keeping. It just says "Civilization 6: End of Cycle"
You talk about the Rorschach test and then seem to proceed as if it couldn't apply to your own interpretation.
If I were overconfident, I'd say that he's hinting that there is more content coming and he's giving us a hint.Why did @Andrew Johnson [FXS] like your post...![]()
I don't think it matter if we know the developers are working more on Civ VI or not.The pragmatist in me says that we'll never know and it's all guess work anyway.
I think we will, but it'll come in one of two forms:I don't think we will ever get a definitive answer
I was agreeing that the amount of speculation is terrifying! I suppose that's why y'all are fanatics. There has not been an official announcement and I do not think that people are leaking hints. I certainly am not and do not intend to - ever, about anything, even playfully. I enjoy discussing history here (and appreciate feedback on writing and text fixes, etc), as I think it enriches the experience of the game, but that is absolutely it.If I were overconfident, I'd say that he's hinting that there is more content coming and he's giving us a hint.
If I were thinking about the debate, perhaps I'd say that he agrees with my overall point that people are drawing conclusions based more on their own thoughts and desires than the evidence put before them, and it has nothing to do with who's actually right.
The cynic in me says he's trolling us.
The pragmatist in me says that we'll never know and it's all guess work anyway.
That's pretty much what I figured - I thought you might have been agreeing with my point in general, but "likes" are so inscrutable on social media that I don't bother reading too much into them. Don't worry, I was only joking about you giving hints.I was agreeing that the amount of speculation is terrifying! I suppose that's why y'all are fanatics. There has not been an official announcement and I do not think that people are leaking hints. I certainly am not and do not intend to - ever, about anything, even playfully. I enjoy discussing history here (and appreciate feedback on writing and text fixes, etc), as I think it enriches the experience of the game, but that is absolutely it.
Personally if they announce a Civ 6 spin-off a la Civ BE I’d imagine that’d be the end for civ 6 tooI think we will, but it'll come in one of two forms:
- The announcement of NFP 2 (or whatever the name of the new content is).
- The announcement of Civ 7 as being imminent. Once they announce Civ 7, I think it's as good as said that Civ 6 will have no new content.
I did consider that, but I'm not sure. The lack of surety in that is down to ignorance ony part more than anything else.Personally if they announce a Civ 6 spin-off a la Civ BE I’d imagine that’d be the end for civ 6 too
2K didn't get the memo.I think communications have changed too much with the social media era to make such a comparison relevant.
2K didn't get the memo.![]()
IMO Civ6 doesn't need any more content. It needs several more balance/bugfix/polish passes though!
(and better modding tools)
Speaking as a UI modder. It’s not so bad that I’d call it a joke I don’t think. They DO have to strike that balance between presenting enough data to make decisions and not overwhelming the player (especially more casual players) with information. Too many UI mods go overboard with providing that information.Agreed. I’d rather have a game with a dozen civs where everything worked properly and the UI wasn’t a bad joke