Lost notes on alchemy by Isaac Newton found

Knight-Dragon

Unhidden Dragon
Retired Moderator
Joined
Jun 25, 2001
Messages
19,961
Location
Singapore
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050701...okhANEA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

LONDON (Reuters) - A collection of notes by the 17th century English mathematician and physicist Sir Isaac Newton, that scientists thought had been lost forever, have been found.

The notes on alchemy were originally discovered after Newton's death in 1727 but were lost after they were sold at auction in July 1936 for 15 pounds ($27).

They were found while researchers were cataloguing manuscripts at the Royal Society, Britain's academy of leading scientists.

"This is a hugely exciting find for Newton scholars and for historians of science in general," Dr John Young, of London's Imperial College Newton Project, said in a statement on Friday.

Newton's celebrated work "Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica" (or Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy) is considered one of the most important works in the history of modern science.

In it he formulates the three laws of motion and that of gravity.

Some scientists in Newton's time believed alchemy held the secret of how to transform base metals into silver or gold. Newton's notes were written in English in his own handwriting.

"It provides vital evidence about the alchemical authors Newton was reading, and the alchemical theories he was investigating in the last decades of the 17th century," Young added.

The notes will be on display at the Royal Society's annual Summer Science Exhibition in London which begins on July 4.
 
Well Newton did some crazy things in his lifetime. One being the research of alchemy. I bet these notes will be a considerable source for information into Newtons thoughts.
 
There was nothing intrinsically crazy about alchemy, though. To us it seems odd that a great rationalist like Newton should have been an alchemist, but that's because we know that alchemy doesn't work. Newton didn't know that and neither did anyone else in his day. So why shouldn't he have done alchemical research? It was a perfectly valid scientific thing to do.

Now, sticking pins into his eyeballs, *that* was a crazy thing to do.
 
There were many things about alchemy that turned out to be false; yet some prevail in the basic principle that you can take basic elements and turn them into compounds or even super atoms which act like other elements.
 
Back
Top Bottom