Roman numerals are not position. When, as here, there are no subtractors involved, you simply add the values of the letters together: 1000+500+100+100+50+10+10+5+1=1776Lonkut said:So what that doesn't mean 1776?
Shouldn't the whole number mean 152526? Or something like that?
That would be 1000+500, as a matter of fact.1000+5000+...
Lonkut said:Didn't the romans have a number bigger then 1000? Like one letter meaning 2000?
Lonkut said:Didn't the romans have a number bigger then 1000? Like one letter meaning 2000?
They had a sign for 10,000 which looked something like this ((|)) and one for 100,000 (((|))) , but they're unusual (also, the old sign for 1000 was (|), later it was replaced with the more familiar M)Lonkut said:Didn't the romans have a number bigger then 1000? Like one letter meaning 2000?
From Wikipedia: Arabic NumeralsThe Last Conformist said:I thought it was common knowledge that the Arabic numerals weren't invented by Arabs, but Indians ...
The Last Conformist said:I thought it was common knowledge that the Arabic numerals weren't invented by Arabs, but Indians ...
I don't feel like it. The whole story should be found in any decent book of the history of mathematics anyway.PantheraTigris2 said:Why don't you prepare a lengthy, in-depth essay on the history of their origin, and evolution, for all of us to study.