Michael Moore wants best picture Oscar

Status
Not open for further replies.

MarineCorps

Explosion!
Joined
Jun 26, 2003
Messages
8,187
Location
Cape Cod
Michael Moore says he won’t submit “Fahrenheit 9/11” for consideration as best documentary at this year’s Academy Awards. Instead, he’s going for the bigger prize of best picture.

advertisement

Moore’s critically acclaimed film slams President Bush’s war on terror as ill-advised and corrupt. The movie has cheered Democrats but enraged the president’s supporters, who booed Moore when he visited the Republican National Convention last week.

“For me the real Oscar would be Bush’s defeat on Nov. 2,” Moore told The Associated Press during a phone interview Monday from New York.

The $6 million film has become a sensation that collected $117.3 million in the United States this summer, despite an early roadblock when the Walt Disney Co. banned its Miramax Films division from distributing the political hot-potato.

In the midst of the presidential campaign, Moore’s announcement is a strategic move for his Oscar campaign. Documentaries and animated films have their own categories, but the conventional wisdom in Hollywood is that those niche awards can limit a film’s appeal in the overall best picture class.

Moore said he and his producing partner, Harvey Weinstein, agreed “Fahrenheit 9/11” would stand a better chance if they focused solely on the top Oscar.

He also said he wanted to be “supportive of my teammates in nonfiction film.”

So many documentaries — such as the gonzo fast-food satire “Super Size Me” and the sober look at Arab television news in “Control Room” — have made the rounds in theaters recently that Moore, who won the best documentary Oscar for “Bowling for Columbine,” said he wanted to give others a chance.

“It’s not that I want to be disrespectful and say I don’t ever want to win a (documentary) Oscar again,” Moore said. “This just seems like the right thing to do...I don’t want to take away from the other nominees and the attention that they richly deserve.”

Moore also hinted in a recent interview in Rolling Stone he would like the movie to play on television before the presidential election. According to the rules of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, playing on TV would invalidate its contention in the documentary category, but not for best picture. With the movie coming out on DVD Oct. 5, it’s not clear whether the TV deal would happen.

Regardless of who wins the election, Moore said the movie’s presence at the Academy Awards in February will provide another forum for Americans to think about its message.

“The issues in the film — terrorism, the war on terrorism, the Iraq war — will be with us five months from now, sadly,” Moore said. “The issues that the film raises will be no less relevant, in the new year.”

Source

Haha. :lol: He's a nut case. :rolleyes:
 
Well in the case of his movie, which was very well done and very smart (except few unnecessary emotional bits), I think he has very good chance to get it ! ;)
 
I feel sorry for all the other people with the surname, Moore :lol:

He is barmy, and I wish he would quit jumping up, waving his arms, infront of every camera. There are far more interesting things to report than this nut's antics.
 
Don't forget it's Hollywood who'll pick the winner Stormbind, not the people of Blue Mountain, Colorado.
 
Marla_Singer said:
Don't forget it's Hollywood who'll pick the winner Stormbind, not the people of Blue Mountain, Colorado.
(the influencial members of) Hollywood (showbiz) are mostly republican. Thus, by claiming it's not a documentary, Moore may actually be trying to downplay the political issues in his movie, in the hope that (the influencial members of) Hollywood (showbiz) will view it as a less-than-serious story.

What does this have to do with Blue Mountain, Colorado? :confused:

Edit: Added bracketed text
 
If you consider Fahrenheit 911 to be fictional, then perhaps it should be nominated. :p
 
stormbind said:
Hollywood is mostly republican.

Really, I always thought Hollywood was a liberal haven? :confused:
 
Moss321 said:
Really, I always thought Hollywood was a liberal haven? :confused:
It is. Though there's a few conservatives in there.
 
stormbind said:
Hollywood is mostly republican.

Hollywood, Florida, the suburb of Fort Lauderdale, is indeed mostly Republican.

Hollywood, California, on the other hand, is desisively far-left.
 
I always thought of Moore as an idoit, I did go and see the movie with my girlfriend, but she got tired of it and wanted to go home, so we walked out not even half way through.
 
SeleucusNicator said:
Hollywood, Florida, the suburb of Fort Lauderdale, is indeed mostly Republican.

Hollywood, California, on the other hand, is desisively far-left.
When I said Hollywood, I specifically meant the influencial persons who might decide Moore's fate.

But, this reply was unexpected. Thanks for clarifying. I have never been to Hollywood, CA. Is it diverse in population demographics?
 
SeleucusNicator said:
Those are even more liberal.
It makes no sense. The world has been inversed. Bush's tax breaks for the rich didn't interest them? *speechless*
 
They have so much money it doesn't matter to them, they care more for their liberal social policies than for potentially lower taxes.
 
Or, they are saying one thing (for their fans) and doing another (for themselves) .. ;)
 
Well, the aim of this topic is almost as misleading as something created by Moore himself. Here is what the man says of this himself:

Why I Will Not Seek a Best Documentary Oscar
(I'm giving it up in the hopes more voters can see "Fahrenheit 9/11")

9/6/04
Dear Friends,

I had dinner recently with a well-known pollster who had often worked for Republicans. He told me that when he went to see "Fahrenheit 9/11" he got sodistraught he twice had to go out in the lobby and pace during the movie.

"The Bush White House left open a huge void when it came to explaining the war to the American people," he told me. "And your film has filled that void -- and now there is no way to defeat it. It is the atomic bomb of this campaign."

He told me how he had conducted an informal poll with "Fahrenheit 9/11" audiences in three different cities and the results were all the same. "Essentially, 80% of the people going IN to see your movie are already likely Kerry voters and the movie has galvanized them in a way you rarely see Democrats galvanized.

"But, here's the bad news for Bush: Though 80% going IN to your movie are Kerry voters, 100% of those COMING OUT of your movie are Kerry voters. You can't come out of this movie and say, 'I am absolutely and enthusiastically voting for George W. Bush.'"

His findings are similar to those in other polls conducted around the country. In Pennsylvania, a Keystone poll showed that 4% of Kerry's support has come from people who decided to vote for him AFTER seeing "Fahrenheit 9/11" -- and in an election that will be very close, 4% is a landslide. A Harris poll found that 44% of Republicans who see the film give it a "positive" rating. Another poll, to be released this week, shows a 21-point shift in Bush's approval rating, after just one viewing of the movie, among audiences of undecideds who were shown "Fahrenheit 9/11" in Ohio.

My pollster friend told me that he believes if Kerry wins, "Fahrenheit 9/11" will be one of the top three reasons for his election. Kerry's only problem, he said, is how many people will actually be able to see it before election day. The less that see it, the better for Bush.

But 20 million people have already seen it -- and the Gallup poll said that 56% of the American public has seen or plans to see "Fahrenheit 9/11" either in the theater or on home video. The DVD and home video of our film, thanks to our distributors listening to our pleas to release it before November, will be in the stores on October 5. This is very good news.

But can it also be shown on TV? I brought this possibility up in this week's Rolling Stone interview. Our contract with our DVD distributor says no, it cannot. I have asked them to show it just once, perhaps the night before the election. So far, no deal. But I haven't given up trying.

The only problem with my desire to get this movie in front of as many Americans as possible is that, should it air on TV, I will NOT be eligible to submit "Fahrenheit 9/11" for Academy Award consideration for Best Documentary. Academy rules forbid the airing of a documentary on television within nine months of its theatrical release (fiction films do not have the same restriction).

Although I have no assurance from our home video distributor that they would allow a one-time television broadcast -- and the chances are they probably won't -- I have decided it is more important to take that risk and hope against hope that I can persuade someone to put it on TV, even if it's the night before the election.

Therefore, I have decided not to submit "Fahrenheit 9/11" for consideration for the Best Documentary Oscar. If there is even the remotest of chances that I can get this film seen by a few million more Americans before election day, then that is more important to me than winning another documentary Oscar. I have already won a Best Documentary statue. Having a second one would be nice, but not as nice as getting this country back in the hands of the majority.

The deadline to submit the film for the documentary Oscar was last Wednesday. I told my crew who worked on the film, let's let someone else have that Oscar. We have already helped to ignite the biggest year ever for nonfiction films. Last week, 1 out of every 5 films playing in movie theaters across America was a documentary! That is simply unheard of. There have been so many great nonfiction films this year, why not step aside and share what we have with someone else? Remove the 800-pound gorilla from that Oscar category and let the five films who get nominated have all the attention they deserve (instead of the focus being on a film that has already had more than its share of attention).

I've read a lot about "Fahrenheit" being a "sure bet" for the documentary Oscar this year. I don't believe anything is truly a "sure bet." And, in the end, I think sometimes it's good for your soul to give up something everyone says is so easily yours (ask Olympic swimmer Michael Phelps why he gave up his spot in the last race to someone else equally deserving, and you'll know what I am talking about).

I have informed our distributors of my decision. They support me (in fact, they then offered to submit our film for all the other categories it is eligible for, including Best Picture -- so, hey, who knows, maybe I'll get to complete that Oscar speech from 2003! Sorry, just kidding).

Don't get your hopes up for seeing "Fahrenheit 9/11" on TV before the election. In fact, I would count on NOT seeing it there (you know me, I'm always going after something I probably shouldn't). Get to the theaters soon, if you haven't already, or get it from the video store in October and hold house parties. Share it with everyone you know, especially your nonvoting friends. I have included 100 minutes of extras on the DVD -- powerful footage obtained after we made the movie, and some things that are going to drive Karl Rove into a permanent tailspin -- more on this later!

Thanks for all of your support. And go see "Super Size Me," "Control Room," "The Corporation," "Orwell Rolls Over in His Grave," "Bush's Brain," Robert Greenwald's films and the upcoming "Yes Men." You won't be sorry!

Yours,

Michael Moore
mmflint@aol.com

P.S. If you want to read my dispatches for USA Today from inside the Republican Convention, go to www.michaelmoore.com.
 
We already have Michael Moore's best picture..

0_21_moore_big.jpg


:goodjob:

-Elgalad
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom