Dense Forest is good in my opinion (Mirkwood + Fangorn + Old Forest)
And, not to restart the Tundra arguement, but responding to PCH; have you heard of people irigating alaska, northern Canada, Siberia and such? The food comes mostly from Fishing and hearding as far as I could tell. They don't get the food from agriculture as much, because there's not enough growing season
And in the book, WHAT LIVES IN TUNDRA? As far as I can remember, nothing except barbarians (dragons, orcs), and only small settlements can survive next to them. So, in my book, "Tolkien Tundra" shouldn't have anything good. But, the arguement is over
~
~
~
Back to the current
(quoted)
Who wants Marshes? -Yes, keep them, there are enough
Who wants Ashlands? -Landmark
Who wants something else? -Not me
We need to do something with Jungle, but what?
Who wants a Dark Forest? -Thick forest, preferably, but ok
Who wants a moor like Wilderland? -I'd be fine with that too.
Who wants something else? -dunno
It seems that in the book(s) "wilderland" is just anything that isn't civilized. So it describes everything East of the Misty mountains (in the north at least) and parts of land like the barrow downs. So, I'd prefer to have the thick forests (which could all be grouped under Wilderland) as one thing, then another for the moors, thickety places, etc as "Wilderland"
I'm rambling and making no sense, but oh well