Motivations for being a fascist

Does the serpent have brown eyes?

..yes!

Is the serpent wearing glasses?

...YES!

The serpent...is you
honestly now, is this some common knowledge that I am missing, or an inside joke, perhaps idea of reference or some sort of thought broadcasting?
 
Whole different argument and just a distraction so you don't have to admit the lunatics have taken over the GOP and are actively driving out "moderates"/"centrists".

I am the party.

If a viable threat, such as radicals taking over becomes pertinent, then the party will split end of story.
 
honestly now, is this some common knowledge that I am missing, or an inside joke, perhaps idea of reference or some sort of thought broadcasting?

It's some lines of dialogue from an episode of Party Down.
 
But you guys actually do that in other threads. If you didn't, then Akka wouldn't have a point.

You guys?
When have I done it?
Lousy argument anyway. None of the Democrat "extremists" want to replace elected government with just their own little band of the chosen.
 
You guys?
When have I done it?
Lousy argument anyway. None of the Democrat "extremists" want to replace elected government with just their own little band of the chosen.
Sure they do, they want to pack the judiciary and dump the electoral college
 
They kind of need to pack it since the republicans already unbalanced it.
 
Sure they do, they want to pack the judiciary and dump the electoral college

We already have consolidated into a two party system due to bad rules. The non-blind might notice that it's not just a matter of judiciary, but that in the last 20 years the executive branch has repeatedly bypassed legislature to make pseudo-laws by executive fiat and do "not wars". Much more than 20 years actually, just seems more frequent now. Maybe I was too young to notice earlier.

Courts over this stretch have not exactly favored individual liberty.

Also had examples of democrat extremism last summer, ignoring law and letting criminals walk repeatedly because they agreed with their message. Now we have bullcrap like a "CDC eviction ban" or an "OSHA vaccine mandate". Openly stating "yes, I will ignore the bill of rights without involving the legislature because I think it will result in a good outcome" should be a little more suspect than we take it.

I would also hold that the Clinton-era "war on drugs" that scaled up asset forfeiture (an overt due process violation the courts somehow upheld) is another example of this.
 
Any evidence hes a Democrat? He was a Trump apointee.

In any case, listing him as an example of someone who wants to replace elected government with their own little band of the chosen is just classic right-wing projection. One may think his analogies to the "Reichstag moment" are overwrought, but he wanted to defend elected government against a usurper. It is of course no surprise that Republicans will characterize any resistance whatsoever to their illegal actions as the real illegal action.
 
It’s never too late to explore a comment in a thread, so if you want to know what Lexicus meant, you ask him now. We certainly haven’t “moved on” and even if we had, to the extent that can even be a thing on a forum, it’s there waiting to get replied to.
 
he wanted to defend elected government against a usurper.

"If this is true GEN Milley must resign. He usurped civilian authority, broke Chain of Command, and violated the sacrosanct principle of civilian control over the military." - Alexander Vindman

Trump was elected, Milley was the usurper
 
Last edited:
"If this is true GEN Milley must resign. He usurped civilian authority, broke Chain of Command, and violated the sacrosanct principle of civilian control over the military." - Alexander Vindman

Trump was elected, Milley was the usurper

If its true. The source is a book that says lots of things about Trump. Do you believe them as well?
 
Back
Top Bottom