Negotiating With "Terrorists" For Years Now

So, a news reporter referencing something anecdotal is now legitimate proof?
You used her saying something as if it meant something. In showing the U.S. detainee mailing program, the proof you used was just people saying something.

Nevertheless, the statement by her is not in the article and thus is a critique of the article itself. So my original observation remains unaddressed until someone actually steps up to the plate and critiques the content of the article.
 
You used her saying something as if it meant something. In showing the U.S. detainee mailing program, the proof you used was just people saying something.

Rofl, yeah, it was proof...of the womans own attitude towards the USA.

In what I showed, it was relaying individuals sworn deposition.

While they are indeed both cases of people saying something, I dont necessarily think they have equal weight given the circumstances in how the comments were being taken.

Nevertheless, the statement by her is not in the article and thus is a critique of the article itself.

Not of the article, but of the person writing the article.

So my original observation remains unaddressed until someone actually steps up to the plate and critiques the content of the article.

:crazyeye:
 
Back
Top Bottom